Another one that I will miss due to being on holiday out of the country! I have Perahia/Haitink and Buchbinder/Vienna Phil, plus Tan/ Norrington on cassette, which unfortunately I cannot play as I no longer have a tape deck. There are many versions I would happily listen to, but of available versions I would probably buy Bezuidenhout. I suspect that the reviewer will pay only token attention to period instrument performances, though. Why does RR insist on so many performers reviewing works? Academics seem to be the other main source of reviewers. Are there no people like the late Edward Greenfield or Richard Osborne still reviewing, or would they not get a look-in anywhere these days?
BaL 26.03.22 - Beethoven: Piano Concerto no 4 in G major
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by CallMePaul View PostAre there no people like the late Edward Greenfield or Richard Osborne still reviewing, or would they not get a look-in anywhere these days?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by RichardB View PostIntelligent music journalists are a dying breed, not because music journalists are no longer intelligent, but because there are so few opportunities these days for people like the ones you mention to make a career in music journalism. Of course there's no reason why practising musicians and academics shouldn't be able to express themselves cogently and communicatively, and I know many such people; but they seem not to be chosen for programmes like this.
I think the fault with the programme lies with the inadequate time allowed to play excerpts and failure to explain why long revered performances are not in contention. What exactly are the criteria for inclusion since it is obvious that nobody listens to dozens of performances of the same work, presumably better known performers, latest recordings and acknowledged great 'historic' performances are a starting point so why not publish a pre-list of performances being considered so that we can see who has been discarded.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gradus View PostRichard, surely Joanna MacGregor is highly qualified to take on this BAL, just as Sarah Willis and and other working musicians were equally well qualified for theirs.
I think the fault with the programme lies with the inadequate time allowed to play excerpts and failure to explain why long revered performances are not in contention. What exactly are the criteria for inclusion since it is obvious that nobody listens to dozens of performances of the same work, presumably better known performers, latest recordings and acknowledged great 'historic' performances are a starting point so why not publish a pre-list of performances being considered so that we can see who has been discarded.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gradus View PostRichard, surely Joanna MacGregor is highly qualified to take on this BAL, just as Sarah Willis and and other working musicians were equally well qualified for theirs.
I think the fault with the programme lies with the inadequate time allowed to play excerpts and failure to explain why long revered performances are not in contention. What exactly are the criteria for inclusion since it is obvious that nobody listens to dozens of performances of the same work, presumably better known performers, latest recordings and acknowledged great 'historic' performances are a starting point so why not publish a pre-list of performances being considered so that we can see who has been discarded.
Comment
-
-
There is a tendency for the reviewer , if a pianist to like pianists like themselves.
Comment
-
-
Oops.
Back on topic. Sort of. I attended a live piano recital by Joanna McG some years ago. At the time she had her hair in dreadlocks. One kept falling out of place as she played. This clearly upset an elderly lady sitting next to me in the audience, who kept muttering (not very sotto voce) "How can she see with her hair in her eyes?" I tried not to let this distract me from an otherwise superb concert, and restrained myself from explaining to the said lady that as no printed music was involved, a few stray strands of hair would not be a problem. By good fortune there was an empty chair next to me in the second half. The grumpy old so-and-so had obviously left in high dudgeon during the interval.Last edited by ardcarp; 14-03-22, 17:05.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ardcarp View PostOops.
Back on topic. Sort of. I attended a live piano recital by Joanna McG some years ago. At the time she had her hair in dreadlocks. One kept falling out of place as she played. This clearly upset an elderly lady sitting next to me in the audience, who kept muttering (not very sotto voce) "How can she see with her hair in her eyes?" I tried not to let this distract me from an otherwise superb concert, and restrained myself from explaining to the said lady that as no printed music was involved, a few stray strands of hair would not be a problem. By good fortune there was an empty chair next to me in the second half. The grumpy old so-and-so had obviously left in high dudgeon during the interval.Last edited by Barbirollians; 14-03-22, 23:59.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by silvestrione View PostAshkenazy/Solti I think. At least, that disc won on one occasion, as I remember going out and buying the LP. Now, though I favour Gilels, Arrau, Schnabel, Pollini, Wallisch, Bezuidenhout, and probably others I have forgotten. It comes up really fresh in those last two, though Bez has the much better accompaniment, IMHO.
Comment
-
Comment