Originally posted by jayne lee wilson
View Post
BaL 8.01.22 - Prokofiev: Symphony No 5 in B-flat major
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostIt’s not a criticism it is a refreshing review and is coruscating about ascetic Tchaikovsky. She hardly praises Petrenko and describes Currentzis as unruly and “ shamelessly manipulative “ and compared to him Jarvi is intelligent and refined so gives him a much harder kicking too. A plague on all their houses review.
Having listened to the middle movements of the 6th and sampled the others (via Qobuz 24/96), I can only add that her report on the interpretation and sonic character appear to be accurate and fastidiously expressed. And it is very different - a fascinating listen!Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 14-01-22, 01:53.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostI think you are clearly forcing the very carefully-nuanced text of her review to meet your own initially exaggerated response to it. But I can hardly quote the whole piece here, just invite others who can read it to offer their own very welcome views......
Having listened to the middle movements of the 6th and sampled the others (via Qobuz 24/96), I can only add that her report on the interpretation and sonic character appear to be accurate and fastidiously expressed. And it is very different - a fascinating listen!Don’t cry for me
I go where music was born
J S Bach 1685-1750
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostI think you are clearly forcing the very carefully-nuanced text of her review to meet your own initially exaggerated response to it. But I can hardly quote the whole piece here, just invite others who can read it to offer their own very welcome views......
Having listened to the middle movements of the 6th and sampled the others (via Qobuz 24/96), I can only add that her report on the interpretation and sonic character appear to be accurate and fastidiously expressed. And it is very different - a fascinating listen!
The thrust of her review of Jarvi’s recording is very clear that for all its virtues it is of a type that drains emotion from the work and undermines its very essence . Indeed she says Granted, the general trend these days is to resist the sublime and “subvert” the greatness of composers and their masterpieces . Jurowski’s and Kirill Petrenko’s recent recordings share something of this approach but they are not as extreme as Jarvi’s
I am not sure how there can be anything but one interpretation of her criticism of Currentzis’s recording.
If Jarvi’s Pathetique falls at one end of the spectrum at the other end is the unruly and shamelessly manipulative Currentzis.Compared to that Jarvi’s music making with the Zurich Tonhalle Orchestra undeniably possesses the virtues of intelligence and refinement
Comment
-
Comment