Originally posted by cloughie
View Post
BaL 8.01.22 - Prokofiev: Symphony No 5 in B-flat major
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by RichardB View PostWell, the HIPP view is that there is no HIPP view, on account of the known fact that Prokofiev didn't write his music specifically for Russian orchestras to play.
I found the comments on Litton's recording quite convincing and look forward to listening to the whole thing, even though as I've said it isn't really a favourite of mine, having found myself very sympathetic to Marina's emphasis on being able to hear everything that's happening at every moment.Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 08-01-22, 14:41.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostYes, but that doesn't mean the composer was necessarily bothered about the playing style. Take Elgar, or example. His earliest recordings ooze with string portamento, but this is massively reduced in the later ones under his baton.
However I would have thought the sound of the instruments of the era is part and parcel of the sound expected by the Prokofiev in his work or maybe now the modern orchestral sound of big works by composers as recent as 80ish years ago is unchanged to now and therefore therefore hipp proof!Last edited by cloughie; 08-01-22, 14:52.
Comment
-
-
This was a very informative and intriguing BAL IMV, with lots of extracts, introduced with knowledge and insight. There was of course one very Russian performance by the Bolshoi orchestra. Dismissed because of its sound, which I found quite good!
(Disappointing that A McG now feels he can intervene a bit, clearly wishing to steer the reviewer in certain directions: though at least in his final comment at the end he was positive about the Karajan -- to make up?)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by silvestrione View PostThere was of course one very Russian performance by the Bolshoi orchestra. Dismissed because of its sound, which I found quite good!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by RichardB View PostYes, although I was listening in the car so I have very little idea of which recordings were better, I found the except very promising.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostHas the Melodiya set been deleted?
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Symphonies-.../dp/B004FSJPG8 Ouch! $500 from amazon.com
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Goon525 View PostYup, apart from the (surprising?) surprise reaction to the high ranking of HvK, Andrew also almost undermined Marina’s final choice by suggesting that the Bergen Phil didn’t sound very Russian. Whether that’s fair comment or not, was it an appropriate comment?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostHas the Melodiya set been deleted?
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Symphonies-.../dp/B004FSJPG8 Ouch! $500 from amazon.com
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Maclintick View PostHe did seem overly-insistent on questioning whether MF-W thought the contenders sounded sufficiently Russian in orchestral timbre, an aspect glossed over when discussing the near-contemporaneous DSCH Leningrad with Ed Seckerson few weeks ago.
Excellent BAL, otherwise. MF-W is good value.I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostTell you what Bryn - you buy, burn to CDRs and send them on to me!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View PostAren't you setting this up so BaL and AM lose both ways? Too many queries on Russian sonority today, not enough on Shoster 7? In the latter there was plenty said about the Russian brass sound in the MravinskyLast edited by Maclintick; 08-01-22, 22:21.
Comment
-
Comment