BaL 11.12.21 - Shostakovich: Symphony no. 7 "Leningrad"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Alison
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 6475

    #46
    What a surprise choice.

    Comment

    • BBMmk2
      Late Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 20908

      #47
      Originally posted by Alison View Post
      What a surprise choice.

      I thought so too. I disagree with it.
      Don’t cry for me
      I go where music was born

      J S Bach 1685-1750

      Comment

      • Bryn
        Banned
        • Mar 2007
        • 24688

        #48
        Originally posted by Alison View Post
        What a surprise choice.
        Indeed. Bernstein is the very last conductor I would expect Seckerson to have gone for.

        Comment

        • Darloboy
          Full Member
          • Jun 2019
          • 335

          #49
          Originally posted by Darloboy View Post
          A work that’s only been covered by BaL once previously, in January 1989, when the reviewer was… Edward Seckerson! Does anyone know what he chose?
          No answer to this but given that today's Bernstein winner wasn't released until later in 1989, I'll just assume he chose the NY Bernstein last time out.

          Comment

          • LeMartinPecheur
            Full Member
            • Apr 2007
            • 4717

            #50
            Well, call me a sucker but I've just ordered the Mravinsky and the CSO/ Bernstein. To join the Haitink, Svetlanov and the legendary 'Superdrug' The work rose considerably in my estimation thanks to ES's examples and exposition
            I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!

            Comment

            • richardfinegold
              Full Member
              • Sep 2012
              • 7750

              #51
              I caught some of this on my CA streamer via Chromecast at 4:30 AM our time. The Bernstein DG sits on my shelves and I used to have the N.Y.
              Phil. I don’t recall a lot of difference between the two so I had purged the earlier account years back.
              I enjoy reading Seckerson, and this was my first time hearing him. He stimulates interest in the work itself and imo that is more important than his ultimate choice. We can all differ as to our favorites, but a critic that illuminates and entertains is a valuable thing

              Comment

              • gurnemanz
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 7416

                #52
                My recordings:
                Arturo Toscanini, Bernard Haitink (mentioned and dismissed)
                Evgeny Mravinsky (recommended for Soviet authenticity - rec 1953, also the year Stalin died)
                Kirill Kondrashin, Rudolph Barshai (not mentioned, unless I missed)
                Leonard Bernstein (wrong recording - NYP)

                Comment

                • BBMmk2
                  Late Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 20908

                  #53
                  Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                  Indeed. Bernstein is the very last conductor I would expect Seckerson to have gone for.
                  I don’t think Barshai had a look in!!
                  Don’t cry for me
                  I go where music was born

                  J S Bach 1685-1750

                  Comment

                  • Goon525
                    Full Member
                    • Feb 2014
                    • 606

                    #54
                    Although I wouldn’t particularly argue with ES’s choice on this occasion, his penchant for anything Lenny has ever done has made his BaLs a tad farcical. You can understand a lot about ES from his view that Bernard Haitink lacked the temperament for Mahler and Shostakovich. I can figure where he’s coming from, but it’s such a shallow view.

                    One other point: having said that technology was important in this work because of its scale, he then chose a version which is a third of a century old. Now it doesn’t sound bad, far from it, but the extract from the Boston/Nelsons sounded glorious, leagues ahead. Shame that was considered ‘mannered’.

                    Comment

                    • duncan
                      Full Member
                      • Apr 2012
                      • 248

                      #55
                      An enjoyable BAL and we now know the most Bernsteinesque performance of the Leningrad was by ....Lenny Bernstein!

                      I listened to a stream of the Mravinsky as a result. Still not sure this is a home listening experience for me, though noted that not everyone has that choice.

                      Comment

                      • Alison
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 6475

                        #56
                        Originally posted by Goon525 View Post
                        Although I wouldn’t particularly argue with ES’s choice on this occasion, his penchant for anything Lenny has ever done has made his BaLs a tad farcical. You can understand a lot about ES from his view that Bernard Haitink lacked the temperament for Mahler and Shostakovich. I can figure where he’s coming from, but it’s such a shallow view.

                        One other point: having said that technology was important in this work because of its scale, he then chose a version which is a third of a century old. Now it doesn’t sound bad, far from it, but the extract from the Boston/Nelsons sounded glorious, leagues ahead. Shame that was considered ‘mannered’.

                        Comment

                        • Alison
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 6475

                          #57
                          It was rather a small field this week.

                          Surprised Sir Mark not included.
                          Last edited by Alison; 13-12-21, 07:47.

                          Comment

                          • BBMmk2
                            Late Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 20908

                            #58
                            Originally posted by Alison View Post
                            It was rather a small field this week.

                            Surprised Sir Mark not included.
                            Indeed it was.
                            Don’t cry for me
                            I go where music was born

                            J S Bach 1685-1750

                            Comment

                            • Bryn
                              Banned
                              • Mar 2007
                              • 24688

                              #59
                              Originally posted by Alison View Post
                              It was rather a small field this week.

                              Surprised Sir Mark not included.
                              Perhaps Seckers has a quick scan of the Amazon customer reviews and ruled it out without further investigation.

                              Comment

                              • Barbirollians
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 11771

                                #60
                                Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                                Perhaps Seckers has a quick scan of the Amazon customer reviews and ruled it out without further investigation.
                                It’s not a surprise that the DG Bernstein won but I see that the late Michael Oliver raved about it in Gramophone when it was first released and declared it a clear winner. I only have his CBS version which is also very good.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X