What a surprise choice.
BaL 11.12.21 - Shostakovich: Symphony no. 7 "Leningrad"
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Darloboy View PostA work that’s only been covered by BaL once previously, in January 1989, when the reviewer was… Edward Seckerson! Does anyone know what he chose?
Comment
-
-
I caught some of this on my CA streamer via Chromecast at 4:30 AM our time. The Bernstein DG sits on my shelves and I used to have the N.Y.
Phil. I don’t recall a lot of difference between the two so I had purged the earlier account years back.
I enjoy reading Seckerson, and this was my first time hearing him. He stimulates interest in the work itself and imo that is more important than his ultimate choice. We can all differ as to our favorites, but a critic that illuminates and entertains is a valuable thing
Comment
-
-
Although I wouldn’t particularly argue with ES’s choice on this occasion, his penchant for anything Lenny has ever done has made his BaLs a tad farcical. You can understand a lot about ES from his view that Bernard Haitink lacked the temperament for Mahler and Shostakovich. I can figure where he’s coming from, but it’s such a shallow view.
One other point: having said that technology was important in this work because of its scale, he then chose a version which is a third of a century old. Now it doesn’t sound bad, far from it, but the extract from the Boston/Nelsons sounded glorious, leagues ahead. Shame that was considered ‘mannered’.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Goon525 View PostAlthough I wouldn’t particularly argue with ES’s choice on this occasion, his penchant for anything Lenny has ever done has made his BaLs a tad farcical. You can understand a lot about ES from his view that Bernard Haitink lacked the temperament for Mahler and Shostakovich. I can figure where he’s coming from, but it’s such a shallow view.
One other point: having said that technology was important in this work because of its scale, he then chose a version which is a third of a century old. Now it doesn’t sound bad, far from it, but the extract from the Boston/Nelsons sounded glorious, leagues ahead. Shame that was considered ‘mannered’.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostPerhaps Seckers has a quick scan of the Amazon customer reviews and ruled it out without further investigation.
Comment
-
Comment