BaL 30.10.21 - Elgar: Violin Concerto in B minor

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Barbirollians
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 11671

    #46
    Has the old thread been deleted re the 2012 BAL ? If so that’s a shame .

    Comment

    • Eine Alpensinfonie
      Host
      • Nov 2010
      • 20570

      #47
      Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
      Has the old thread been deleted re the 2012 BAL ? If so that’s a shame .
      Not deleted. It’s been temporarily hidden to enable this thread to be the one used to discuss tomorrow’s broadcast. The old one will be restored before too long.

      Comment

      • pastoralguy
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 7740

        #48
        Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post
        Really ? I suppose that might be lockdown as well . But having seen the documentary about performing the Marsalis concerto I doubt if there is a more committed instrumentalist around . She really is dedicated.
        Nicky and I go back a long way.

        Comment

        • BBMmk2
          Late Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 20908

          #49
          I have both of Nigel Kennedy’s and Tasmin Little’s. It be interesting to see which recording in Alpie’s list comes top.
          Don’t cry for me
          I go where music was born

          J S Bach 1685-1750

          Comment

          • Darloboy
            Full Member
            • Jun 2019
            • 323

            #50
            The DON’s kicked off with Handley. Is he going to pick Kennedy?

            Comment

            • Ein Heldenleben
              Full Member
              • Apr 2014
              • 6760

              #51
              Originally posted by Darloboy View Post
              The DON’s kicked off with Handley. Is he going to pick Kennedy?
              Or is it Rattle / Kennedy? He’s teasing us …

              Comment

              • Goon525
                Full Member
                • Feb 2014
                • 597

                #52
                Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post
                Or is it Rattle / Kennedy? He’s teasing us …
                Not really - he’s made clear his preference for the later Kennedy.

                Comment

                • Ein Heldenleben
                  Full Member
                  • Apr 2014
                  • 6760

                  #53
                  Originally posted by Goon525 View Post
                  Not really - he’s made clear his preference for the later Kennedy.
                  Good BAL. But I thought Gielgud meant classic and restrained with Olivier a bit hammy and a teensy - weensy bit over the top.?

                  Comment

                  • Alison
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 6455

                    #54
                    Very interesting edition. Wasn’t that enthralled with the Kennedy ending, I prefer more poise.

                    A swimmy acoustic for Tazza? I’m inspired to revisit my owned versions and learn a few new ones.

                    Solti very much in charge of the Chung version by the sound of it!

                    Comment

                    • Pianoman
                      Full Member
                      • Jan 2013
                      • 529

                      #55
                      No real surprises here - he picked Kennedy in the Violin Sonata on BAL, so obviously a fan; personally I prefer his Handley recording, but my new 'favourite' (for now...) is Catherine Manoukian, live and with tremendous orchestral support. This will change by next week I'm sure.

                      Comment

                      • Ein Heldenleben
                        Full Member
                        • Apr 2014
                        • 6760

                        #56
                        Originally posted by Alison View Post
                        Very interesting edition. Wasn’t that enthralled with the Kennedy ending, I prefer more poise.

                        A swimmy acoustic for Tazza? I’m inspired to revisit my owned versions and learn a few new ones.

                        Solti very much in charge of the Chung version by the sound of it!
                        Yes I thought both Kyung-Wha Chung and Tasmin produced some of the most purely beautiful violin sounds - an important consideration. Also impressed by the quality of the Elgar remastering and Sammons’ portamenti.
                        The winner didn’t surprise or indeed disappoint me but I prefer the Handley version. I think Rattle / Kennedy a tad too histrionic…

                        Comment

                        • BBMmk2
                          Late Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 20908

                          #57
                          I do rather like Tasmin’s and both of the Kennedy recordings.
                          Don’t cry for me
                          I go where music was born

                          J S Bach 1685-1750

                          Comment

                          • LeMartinPecheur
                            Full Member
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 4717

                            #58
                            Slightly puzzled by DON's strictures on Sir Henry Wood in the Sammons. Despite his claims that Wood holds Sammons back too often, this is still by far the fastest of my timed versions:

                            Wood/ Sammons 14'51 + 11'05 + 17'21
                            Elgar/ Menuhin 17'25 + 13'00 + 19'22
                            Handley/ Kennedy 18'58 + 13'21 + 21'26
                            Boult/ Menuhin 17'39 + 11'58 + 18'09
                            Solti/ Chung 18'00 + 12'34 + 18'52
                            Barenboim/ Zukerman 17'57 + 12'23 + 20'02

                            So if Wood really had kept up with Sammons what would the timings have been?? And would we, and perhaps DOM and all critics from Day1, be saying it's just ridiculously rushed?

                            (The one that doesn't give timings is the Boult/ Haendel: slow but how slow? Her version with Rattle looks to be decidedly brisk. Having ordered it the other day my anticipation is further whetted)
                            Last edited by LeMartinPecheur; 30-10-21, 10:28. Reason: Ida Haendel - slow and fast!
                            I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!

                            Comment

                            • Keraulophone
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 1945

                              #59
                              Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View Post

                              Wood/ Sammons 14'51 + 11'05 + 17'21
                              Elgar/ Menuhin 17'25 + 13'00 + 19'22
                              Handley/ Kennedy 18'58 + 13'21 + 21'26
                              Boult/ Menuhin 17'39 + 11'58 + 18'09
                              Solti/ Chung 18'00 + 12'34 + 18'52
                              Barenboim/ Zukerman 17'57 + 12'23 + 20'02

                              The one that doesn't give timings is the Boult/ Haendel: slow but how slow?
                              Boult / Haendel 19’52 + 13’49 + 21’39
                              Rattle / Haendel 17’03 + 11’23 +18’00
                              .

                              Comment

                              • Barbirollians
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 11671

                                #60
                                Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View Post
                                Slightly puzzled by DON's strictures on Sir Henry Wood in the Sammons. Despite his claims that Wood holds Sammons back too often, this is still by far the fastest of my timed versions:

                                Wood/ Sammons 14'51 + 11'05 + 17'21
                                Elgar/ Menuhin 17'25 + 13'00 + 19'22
                                Handley/ Kennedy 18'58 + 13'21 + 21'26
                                Boult/ Menuhin 17'39 + 11'58 + 18'09
                                Solti/ Chung 18'00 + 12'34 + 18'52
                                Barenboim/ Zukerman 17'57 + 12'23 + 20'02

                                So if Wood really had kept up with Sammons what would the timings have been?? And would we, and perhaps DOM and all critics from Day1, be saying it's just ridiculously rushed?

                                (The one that doesn't give timings is the Boult/ Haendel: slow but how slow? Her version with Rattle looks to be decidedly brisk. Having ordered it the other day my anticipation is further whetted)
                                I missed the first 20 minutes but any review that describes Menuhin’s playing in 1932 as histrionic does not get my approval . I have always preferred Nige’s first recording and I don’t think his rather treacly ending to the accompanied cadenza played today did him any favours. I assume Menuhin/ Boult not mentioned or airily dismissed as by Martin Cotton ?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X