Has the old thread been deleted re the 2012 BAL ? If so that’s a shame .
BaL 30.10.21 - Elgar: Violin Concerto in B minor
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View PostReally ? I suppose that might be lockdown as well . But having seen the documentary about performing the Marsalis concerto I doubt if there is a more committed instrumentalist around . She really is dedicated.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Alison View PostVery interesting edition. Wasn’t that enthralled with the Kennedy ending, I prefer more poise.
A swimmy acoustic for Tazza? I’m inspired to revisit my owned versions and learn a few new ones.
Solti very much in charge of the Chung version by the sound of it!
The winner didn’t surprise or indeed disappoint me but I prefer the Handley version. I think Rattle / Kennedy a tad too histrionic…
Comment
-
-
Slightly puzzled by DON's strictures on Sir Henry Wood in the Sammons. Despite his claims that Wood holds Sammons back too often, this is still by far the fastest of my timed versions:
Wood/ Sammons 14'51 + 11'05 + 17'21
Elgar/ Menuhin 17'25 + 13'00 + 19'22
Handley/ Kennedy 18'58 + 13'21 + 21'26
Boult/ Menuhin 17'39 + 11'58 + 18'09
Solti/ Chung 18'00 + 12'34 + 18'52
Barenboim/ Zukerman 17'57 + 12'23 + 20'02
So if Wood really had kept up with Sammons what would the timings have been?? And would we, and perhaps DOM and all critics from Day1, be saying it's just ridiculously rushed?
(The one that doesn't give timings is the Boult/ Haendel: slow but how slow? Her version with Rattle looks to be decidedly brisk. Having ordered it the other day my anticipation is further whetted)I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View Post
Wood/ Sammons 14'51 + 11'05 + 17'21
Elgar/ Menuhin 17'25 + 13'00 + 19'22
Handley/ Kennedy 18'58 + 13'21 + 21'26
Boult/ Menuhin 17'39 + 11'58 + 18'09
Solti/ Chung 18'00 + 12'34 + 18'52
Barenboim/ Zukerman 17'57 + 12'23 + 20'02
The one that doesn't give timings is the Boult/ Haendel: slow but how slow?
Rattle / Haendel 17’03 + 11’23 +18’00
.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View PostSlightly puzzled by DON's strictures on Sir Henry Wood in the Sammons. Despite his claims that Wood holds Sammons back too often, this is still by far the fastest of my timed versions:
Wood/ Sammons 14'51 + 11'05 + 17'21
Elgar/ Menuhin 17'25 + 13'00 + 19'22
Handley/ Kennedy 18'58 + 13'21 + 21'26
Boult/ Menuhin 17'39 + 11'58 + 18'09
Solti/ Chung 18'00 + 12'34 + 18'52
Barenboim/ Zukerman 17'57 + 12'23 + 20'02
So if Wood really had kept up with Sammons what would the timings have been?? And would we, and perhaps DOM and all critics from Day1, be saying it's just ridiculously rushed?
(The one that doesn't give timings is the Boult/ Haendel: slow but how slow? Her version with Rattle looks to be decidedly brisk. Having ordered it the other day my anticipation is further whetted)
Comment
-
Comment