Originally posted by cloughie
View Post
BaL 5.06.21 - Sibelius: Violin Concerto in D
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostInterestingly though that he recorded very little Sibelius - he recorded the VC three times - Chung, Perlman and Mutter (Mrs P at the time).
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Goon525 View PostLeah Broad seems to be doing just fine. Plenty of knowledge well expressed, and loads of enthusiasm for the work and many of its interpreters. And we seem to be getting more than the now customary six or seven versions included.
As to the comment that Sibelius paid Ida Haendel a rare compliment, it wasn't really so rare, Sibelius admired Camilla Wicks and she made a famous recording and played it for his 85th birthday. Sibelius also admired Guilia Bustabo and remarked that she ‘played it exactly as I imagined it when I wrote it’.
After Heifetz, most of the early recordings were by women, in addition to Wicks, there were also fine performances by Neveu and Ignatius
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostMy impression was that the overall acoustic fairly closely matched the sound heard in the Gallery of the RAH.
The strange thing is, I have that CD and it did not strike me as being as bad as it sounded this morning.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostInterestingly though that he recorded very little Sibelius - he recorded the VC three times - Chung, Perlman and Mutter (Mrs P at the time).Last edited by LHC; 05-06-21, 11:16."I do not approve of anything that tampers with natural ignorance. Ignorance is like a delicate exotic fruit; touch it and the bloom is gone. The whole theory of modern education is radically unsound. Fortunately in England, at any rate, education produces no effect whatsoever. If it did, it would prove a serious danger to the upper classes, and probably lead to acts of violence in Grosvenor Square."
Lady Bracknell The importance of Being Earnest
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostReally? The coverage of, and reaction to, his death suggested otherwise, I would say.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Heldenleben View PostI think there was a reaction to his ubiquity in the 70’s - the music night on BBC ONE, Morecambe and Wise. The ‘wonderful but only in a limited repertoire comments ‘ from the critics were typical . The LSO was very dubious initially at taking on a “Hollywood” conductor - there was quite a lot of bitchy stuff in Private Eye. Others, like Jeremy Siepmann for example , singled him out as a very fine pianist . At death I agree judgements were much fairer.
...and also who else before or since has done as much to give a serious introduction of Classical music to a wider audience?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Heldenleben View PostI think there was a reaction to his ubiquity in the 70’s - the music night on BBC ONE, Morecambe and Wise. The ‘wonderful but only in a limited repertoire comments ‘ from the critics were typical . The LSO was very dubious initially at taking on a “Hollywood” conductor - there was quite a lot of bitchy stuff in Private Eye. Others, like Jeremy Siepmann for example , singled him out as a very fine pianist . At death I agree judgements were much fairer.
I also think there was quite a lot of disapproval of his personal life in the 1970s.
Comment
-
-
I am finding that these shoot outs don’t seem to have much relevance for me. So many favorites from the past that don’t get a mention -for me Francescatti, Stern , Oistrakh, Heifetz—and a need to concentrate on recent recordings, which in this work are usually dull. I have heard Batishivili and Kavakos in concert in Sibelius, and felt like they must be getting paid by the minute, no sense of drama at all.
Comment
-
Comment