BaL 5.06.21 - Sibelius: Violin Concerto in D

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Petrushka
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 12332

    #16
    I think the Kremer/BPO/Karajan in the listing is an error, possibly caused by confusing the contents of the EMI Forte double CD which includes the Kremer/Muti in the Sibelius and the Brahms VC which is Kremer/Karajan.

    I've got Francescatti/Bernstein, Accardo/Davis, Ferras/Karajan, Batiashvili/Barenboim and Kennedy/Rattle. The last named is my usual 'go to' in this piece.

    Not sure, but I can only recall two live performances at which I was present, one of which was especially interesting as I think it was the only time that Claudio Abbado conducted anything by Sibelius. The soloist in that 1982 concert was Isaac Stern with the LSO and Mahler 5 was the second half.
    Last edited by Petrushka; 22-05-21, 12:02. Reason: Francescatti not Stern!
    "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink

    Comment

    • richardfinegold
      Full Member
      • Sep 2012
      • 7747

      #17
      If you haven’t heard Francescatti/Bernstein, you owe it to yourself to give it a listen. Unrivaled in its intensity

      Comment

      • Eine Alpensinfonie
        Host
        • Nov 2010
        • 20575

        #18
        Originally posted by Petrushka View Post
        I think the Kremer/BPO/Karajan in the listing is an error, possibly caused by confusing the contents of the EMI Forte double CD which includes the Kremer/Muti in the Sibelius...
        No problem. I shall amend.

        Comment

        • Petrushka
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 12332

          #19
          Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
          No problem. I shall amend.
          I was getting excited about a Karajan disc I hadn't got only to be disappointed when I did a search!
          "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink

          Comment

          • Alison
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 6474

            #20
            Cheers Nethersage, lots of library builders have similar profiles these days! Doesn’t seem a disadvantage to be a youngish female with a university appointment :-)

            Comment

            • cloughie
              Full Member
              • Dec 2011
              • 22205

              #21
              Originally posted by Alison View Post
              Cheers Nethersage, lots of library builders have similar profiles these days! Doesn’t seem a disadvantage to be a youngish female with a university appointment :-)
              Pursuit of attracting the younger listener!

              Comment

              • Bryn
                Banned
                • Mar 2007
                • 24688

                #22
                Originally posted by cloughie View Post
                Pursuit of attracting the younger listener!
                More like a meagre weakening of the glass ceiling.

                Comment

                • Alison
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 6474

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                  More like a meagre weakening of the glass ceiling.

                  Comment

                  • Barbirollians
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 11763

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Alison View Post
                    Looking forward to Campoli arriving tomorrow .

                    For me Haendel/Rattle and Wicks/Ehrling are tops - though Chung,Mutter,Neveu,Frang,Gitlis,Heifetz,Oistrakh,K ennedy,Batiashvili,Ferras and Francescatti ‘s recordings have all given me a great deal of pleasure over the years.

                    Comment

                    • Wolfram
                      Full Member
                      • Jul 2019
                      • 280

                      #25
                      I hope that there will be some discussion in this BaL about the allegro moderato tempo marking in the first movement. Of the 14 recordings that I own they all come in at around 15 to 16 minutes plus for that first movement, with the exception of Heifetz who brings it in at a fraction over 14 minutes with Beecham, and at well under 14 minutes is even faster in Chicago with Hendl. I was brought up on the Heifetz Chicago recording, and that tempo still sounds absolutely right to me. Francescatti also plays it at speed similar to Heifetz, but I am not familar with his recording.The soloist has to work so much harder to stop the music dragging at the slower tempi that seem to be commonplace now. Mullova manages to do it, but I'm not sure that many others do. Looking at the score I don't know how Heifetz manages to play it at that pace at all quite frankly, and also the score is littered with tempo changes, so I am really looking forward to hearing someone who is expert in this repertoire guiding us through these fundamental differences in approach.
                      Last edited by Wolfram; 23-05-21, 11:36.

                      Comment

                      • Rolmill
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 636

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Wolfram View Post
                        I hope that there will be some discussion in this BaL about the allegro moderato tempo marking in the first movement. Of the 14 recordings that I own they all come in at around 15 to 16 minutes plus for that first movement, with the exception of Heifetz who brings it in at a fraction over 14 minutes with Beecham, and at well under 14 minutes is even faster in Chicago with Hendl. I was brought up on the Heifetz Chicago recording, and that tempo still sounds absolutely right to me. Francescatti also plays it at speed similar to Heifetz, but I am not familar with his recording.The soloist has to work so much harder to stop the music dragging at the slower tempi that seem to be commonplace now. Mullova manages to do it, but I'm not sure that many others do. Looking at the score I don't know how Heifetz manages to play it at that pace at all quite frankly, and also the score is littered with tempo changes, so I am really looking forward to hearing someone who is expert in this repertoire guiding us through these fundamental differences in approach.
                        Interesting point - most in my collection actually take 16-17 minutes, Oistrakh takes just over 15 and Gitlis almost exactly 14, with Heifetz/Hendl (as you say) the fastest at well under 14. That's quite a range, with the slowest (Hahn) nearly 4 minutes longer than Heifetz. I must admit, Heifetz is my go to for this piece, with Batiashvili my favourite modern recording.

                        Comment

                        • Wolfram
                          Full Member
                          • Jul 2019
                          • 280

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Rolmill View Post
                          Interesting point - most in my collection actually take 16-17 minutes, Oistrakh takes just over 15 and Gitlis almost exactly 14, with Heifetz/Hendl (as you say) the fastest at well under 14. That's quite a range, with the slowest (Hahn) nearly 4 minutes longer than Heifetz. I must admit, Heifetz is my go to for this piece, with Batiashvili my favourite modern recording.
                          Julian Rachlin with Maazel is another slow coach, slower, by a whisker, even than Hahn. Some of these tempi strike me as being more like andante than allegro moderato, with the more extreme ones like Hahn and Rachlin more like adagio. I am completely with you in admiration for Heifetz in this work.

                          Comment

                          • Barbirollians
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 11763

                            #28
                            Just watched the Campoli/Barbirolli and though the sound is very mono it is a grippingly intense reading with an exceptionally moving slow movement .It is a great shame a Campoli was given so little opportunity to record in the stereo era. What a terrific studio recording they might have made.
                            Last edited by Barbirollians; 23-05-21, 16:35.

                            Comment

                            • Barbirollians
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 11763

                              #29
                              I find I own 30 of these - gulp .

                              Is the Tasmin Little/Vernon Handley recording out of the catalogue ?

                              Comment

                              • mikealdren
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 1205

                                #30
                                I have (double gulp) 37 although that does include 5 different Oistrakh versions Kavakos chips in twice (with the original and final versions) but to my surprise I don't have Ida Haendel or Kremer, both of whom I have heard play it (magnificently) live.

                                There are so many fine recordings of this work and only a few (Menuhin, Hahn) that I would rule out as complete non starters. I guess the next step is to weed out the more bland versions, this is one concerto that has to be spine tingling. A violinist friend automatically discounts anyone who doesn't start quietly enough.....

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X