BaL 8.05.21 - Smetana: Má Vlast

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ardcarp
    Late member
    • Nov 2010
    • 11102

    #91
    Yes, but some work better than others. 1, 5 and 6 make little sense outside of the sequence.
    I have exactly the same thoughts, Jayne. You beat me to it. I've always thought Blanik (No 6) includes an awful lot of crash-bang-wallops which make little sense without knowledge of earlier thematic material. I wouldn't want to listen to it as a stand-alone piece.

    Comment

    • visualnickmos
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 3614

      #92
      Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
      There is still (in 1958) the "Sound of Old Vienna" in there somewhere isn't there? As you hear in Knappertsbusch' Bruckner, Scherchen's Haydn etc...
      So you perceive that Slav-folk input, Bohemian in character, Austro-Hungarian in its sources....very appealing. You are reminded of Mahler's "thrice homeless" comment.

      The Wiener Phiharmoniker have lost some of their distinctiveness since the 50s, so it would be interesting to see what Harnoncourt made of it in Ma Vlast..... but I'm a slow listener these days, and its a long work. Ars Longa Vita Brevis indeed... glad I revisited this one though.
      There is still (in 1958) the "Sound of Old Vienna" in there somewhere isn't there?
      - Definitely. In that particular avenue, it stands alone, well, certainly from the versions I have.

      So you perceive that Slav-folk input, Bohemian in character, Austro-Hungarian in its sources....very appealing.
      - Certainly, which I suppose may not be wholly unexpected, given that perhaps some of the musicians may have had their musical roots close to, or in the Slav-folk tradition. I could be completely wrong, but I do feel there may be a link.

      The Wiener Phiharmoniker have lost some of their distinctiveness since the 50s, so it would be interesting to see what Harnoncourt made of it in Ma Vlast
      - Again - I go along with that. Perhaps it (VPO) has become more 'universalised' in its sound, over the decades. I would also be interested to "see what Harnoncourt made of it" One thing for sure; I have the impression there are many fine versions of this huge chef d'oeuvre, from almost all major (and some 'lesser') conductors and ensembles. I can't say yet that I've heard any real turkeys...... long may that continue!

      Comment

      • jayne lee wilson
        Banned
        • Jul 2011
        • 10711

        #93
        Originally posted by Bryn View Post
        , though I'm not that fond of listening to even Vltava on its own.
        Absolutely. It is a very strong cycle, and works beautifully as an evening-length experience, especially as the interval falls so naturally after Sarka.

        Comment

        • cloughie
          Full Member
          • Dec 2011
          • 22182

          #94
          Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
          Each of its movements can be legitimately listened to as stand alones though, I think?
          Yes indeed and in playing separately no blood is shed.

          ...Jayne, I disagree and could listen to Vysehrad on its own anytime and those harps at the beginning are wonderful!

          Comment

          • Petrushka
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 12309

            #95
            Originally posted by cloughie View Post
            Yes indeed and in playing separately no blood is shed.

            ...Jayne, I disagree and could listen to Vysehrad on its own anytime and those harps at the beginning are wonderful!
            Once I'd heard the complete cycle there was never any thought to listening to individual movements again. It is so thematically connected that it makes a very satisfying whole and the 75 minutes whizz by so quickly that I don't usually have an interval.
            "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink

            Comment

            • Barbirollians
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 11752

              #96
              The VPO/Kubelik sounds very well on the secondhand Belart CD I bought.

              Comment

              • Master Jacques
                Full Member
                • Feb 2012
                • 1927

                #97
                Two small comments (with apologies if anyone's made them before):

                Hrusa's Prague Philharmonia performance is in a different bracket to the great majority of recorded performances, as the orchestra is a slightly extended chamber orchestra, i.e. smaller than we're used to in Ma Vlast. That's why some people find the recording too close: like Anna Pickard, they don't realize that they're listening to a reduced number of players.

                Norrington's performance is a must-have for anyone who wants to get an idea of the sound Smetana actually had in mind - it is (to use an overused epithet!) a revelation. The winds are much more prominent, in absolutely equal interplay with the smaller body of strings. The sense of "blocks" of colour is startling, and the distinctiveness of this true "Smetana sound" is pungent, and virile, with nothing "smoothed out" or "cushioned" about it. Hrusa was trying to replicate this feeling, in using a reduced string section in his Prague Philharmonia performance.

                Comment

                • Bryn
                  Banned
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 24688

                  #98
                  Originally posted by Master Jacques View Post
                  Two small comments (with apologies if anyone's made them before):

                  Hrusa's Prague Philharmonia performance is in a different bracket to the great majority of recorded performances, as the orchestra is a slightly extended chamber orchestra, i.e. smaller than we're used to in Ma Vlast. That's why some people find the recording too close: like Anna Pickard, they don't realize that they're listening to a reduced number of players.

                  Norrington's performance is a must-have for anyone who wants to get an idea of the sound Smetana actually had in mind - it is (to use an overused epithet!) a revelation. The winds are much more prominent, in absolutely equal interplay with the smaller body of strings. The sense of "blocks" of colour is startling, and the distinctiveness of this true "Smetana sound" is pungent, and virile, with nothing "smoothed out" or "cushioned" about it. Hrusa was trying to replicate this feeling, in using a reduced string section in his Prague Philharmonia performance.
                  Very well put, if I may say so.

                  Comment

                  • ardcarp
                    Late member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 11102

                    #99
                    Norrington's performance is a must-have for anyone who wants to get an idea of the sound Smetana actually had in mind - it is (to use an overused epithet!) a revelation. The winds are much more prominent, in absolutely equal interplay with the smaller body of strings. The sense of "blocks" of colour is startling, and the distinctiveness of this true "Smetana sound" is pungent, and virile, with nothing "smoothed out" or "cushioned" about it. Hrusa was trying to replicate this feeling, in using a reduced string section in his Prague Philharmonia performance.
                    You've rather sold that to me, MJ. Must try and hear it. Very difficult to know what Smetana 'had in mind' of course, but that applies to all historically researched performances of whatever era. But the number of generations between us and Smetana is far less than for Baroque composers. Musical 'memories' are much more likely to be accurately transmitted. [One fact I always find interesting but which others probably think irrelevant is that 'Daddy' Mann, organist of Kings College Cambridge until 1929, was taught the organ by someone born in the 18th...yes, eighteenth...century.The human span is long.]

                    Comment

                    • visualnickmos
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 3614

                      Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
                      The VPO/Kubelik sounds very well on the secondhand Belart CD I bought.
                      Those Belart CDS are very good; rubbish design and artwork, one could be forgiven for thinking they will BE rubbish!

                      Comment

                      • cloughie
                        Full Member
                        • Dec 2011
                        • 22182

                        Originally posted by visualnickmos View Post
                        Those Belart CDS are very good; rubbish design and artwork, one could be forgiven for thinking they will BE rubbish!
                        They’re the forerunners to Eloquence - all vintage Decca/DG/Philips !

                        Back on topic I have just added CPO/Ancerl vintage Supraphon to my collection.

                        Comment

                        • Barbirollians
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 11752

                          Originally posted by cloughie View Post
                          They’re the forerunners to Eloquence - all vintage Decca/DG/Philips !

                          Back on topic I have just added CPO/Ancerl vintage Supraphon to my collection.
                          Dresden/Berglund just arrived here.

                          Comment

                          • Barbirollians
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 11752

                            Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
                            Dresden/Berglund just arrived here.
                            Finally got round to listening to it . Less “Czech” than Anvers and the like but heavens it is fabulously played,conducted and recorded . A marvellous record.

                            Comment

                            • cloughie
                              Full Member
                              • Dec 2011
                              • 22182

                              Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
                              Finally got round to listening to it . Less “Czech” than Anvers and the like but heavens it is fabulously played,conducted and recorded . A marvellous record.
                              I assume Anvers typo translates as Karel!

                              Comment

                              • Barbirollians
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 11752

                                Originally posted by cloughie View Post
                                I assume Anvers typo translates as Karel!
                                Ancerl !

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X