Originally posted by Richard Barrett
View Post
BaL 6.03.21 - Debussy: Études pour piano
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post... I think that many of us listen with interest to Building a Library - but often find that it is not necessarily the critic's "winner" which clicks with us, but one of the other performances discussed and discarded. It is the opportunity of sampling half-a-dozen interpretations which is of interest rather than a critic's individual take.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post... I think that many of us listen with interest to Building a Library - but often find that it is not necessarily the critic's "winner" which clicks with us, but one of the other performances discussed and discarded. It is the opportunity of sampling half-a-dozen interpretations which is of interest rather than a critic's individual take.
.
But now you listen to them on your streaming service instead. When I started listening to Record Review, it was like an on-air version of that. Of course you sometimes had different conclusions. Why wouldn't you? Classical obsessives are very discriminating and rarely slavish. (Would you like me to list all the versions of the Debussy Etudes that Gramophone has discussed and recommended over the last few decades? Pity Michelangeli never did them.)
Shame that so much focus here is on "reviews" as such.
There has always been far more to Music Magazines, with their features and surveys and discussions....
The history of response to post-war New Music or HIPPs and original instruments, can be traced in the Gramophone Archive back to the 50s, and very fascinating (and largely openminded, curious, welcoming and positive) it is. A degree of humility before the unknown.
Very different from the wider world.
But if you don't read it or delve among its decades, you don't know, and go on making false assumptions about readers and writers and their continuous, historically and personally complex interreaction.
Not to mention missing out on serendipity, and the Literary Pleasures on offer. Nothing like some eloquent, insightful or witty prose to brighten your day, or discovering things you didn't know you wanted...
Sun's out..... Hungry Cats and Birds........Garden beckons.....Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 28-02-21, 13:29.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by visualnickmos View PostThat's very often my conclusion, too. Also - there have been times when a reviewer has praised this or that version, for a number of reasons, which are often the reasons that turn me off! Or the reverse, 'negative' points, that have been the very aspects that I relish! Can't please everyone!
As I mentioned earlier, I find it odd is that Uchida achieved seemingly the best by far, in many reviewers ears, recording of the Debussy Etudes but she has not recorded any other Debussy or for that matter any French music.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostAs I mentioned earlier, I find it odd is that Uchida achieved seemingly the best by far, in many reviewers ears, recording of the Debussy Etudes but she has not recorded any other Debussy or for that matter any French music.
On Youtube there is an interesting 20 minute video of her talking about interpretation of the Debussy Etudes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYbgaPNjG3k
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostI think that a good way of selling record to me is a reviewer say how wayward or wiful it is. My reaction is often ‘I’ll hVe some of that!’ A good example many years ago was the Ahronovich Tchaik Manfred Sym.
As I mentioned earlier, I find it odd is that Uchida achieved seemingly the best by far, in many reviewers ears, recording of the Debussy Etudes but she has not recorded any other Debussy or for that matter any French music.
Aronovitch/Tamas Vasary are gret in the Rachmaninov piano concertos (also DG)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by visualnickmos View PostThat is a rather splendid recording - until the organ comes in - or rather, almost doesn't. On my redording, it is barely (if at all) audible, compared to my other recordings of this work. It seems to be indistinguishable from the orchestra..... what do you feel about it? Am I missing something, here...?
Comment
-
-
By chance I came across Bryce Morrison’s G-collection survey of the Debussy Etudes… (G., 1/2005…).
Uchida was his personal choice, but in true Interpetations-on-Record tradition he offered a generous shortlist of alternatives - Bavouzet, Fergus-Thompson, Gieseking, Thibaudet, Paul Jacobs…..Aimard was highly praised too, as a sort of polar opposite to Uchida.
Also individual studies recorded by Horowitz and Van Cliburn, and many less familiar names on the longlist to seek out and stream.
Excellent piece covering almost 70 years of recordings, going into great and precise detail about the music itself, its earliest French and other performance traditions and interpretive approaches. So seek it out if you can, either online or among your shelved back issues.…Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 28-02-21, 20:09.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by rauschwerk View PostThe composer actually specifies a harmonium here. It's marked ff grand jeu but clearly if an organ is used it's not meant to lift the roof off.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by visualnickmos View PostMany thanks for sharing that knowledge. The difference between an expert, and someone like me. I can now continue to enjoy the recording in question, with complete satisfaction.
Regarding the Debussy Etudes, I had the Paul Jacobs lp, and my only digital version is Frankl on Vox. Although I like a few of the Etudes and frequently listen to Debussy other Piano Music I ‘ve never appreciated the work enough to collect multiple versions
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostI have developed something of an allergy to Uchida as a result of my listening experiences with her Schubert and Mozart sonata surveys on disc. Perhaps her Debussy Etudes would restore my previous admiration for her playing, but I'm in no hurry to find out.
Comment
-
-
I enjoyed this BAL and found Ian Burnside’s insights illuminating. He gave AMG’s interjections all the attention they deserved. I had listened blind to all the versions in my collection in preparation for this, and preferred Bavouzet to all others. Burnside crystallised the reasons why, an effervescent performance rather than a study.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Belgrove View PostI enjoyed this BAL and found Ian Burnside’s insights illuminating. He gave AMG’s interjections all the attention they deserved. I had listened blind to all the versions in my collection in preparation for this, and preferred Bavouzet to all others. Burnside crystallised the reasons why, an effervescent performance rather than a study.
Comment
-
Comment