Originally posted by Richard Barrett
View Post
I found this a valuable context-giving post, RB, thanks.
Finally caught up with this BAL... interesting as far as it went, but I agree with others that perverse omissions (not to mention inclusions: I’m with you, Jayne, about the Muti... did we get 2 extracts of that or 3? ) made it too subjective to be a useful guide.
Gone are the days when BAL provided something approaching an authoritative survey. It now seems just randomly (and often only vaguely) interesting.
Comment