Originally posted by Master Jacques
View Post
Bal 8.02.20/13.6.20 - Mozart: Symphony no. 39 in E flat K.543
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostYes, his wonderful Haffner Serenade do?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostJacobs', 1st Movement after 1'04, see above....
If I saw that in a score, I’d play it the Jacobs way. But then I’m no expert on grace notes.
Some good responses below , with the most convincing replies ( allowing for confirmation bias ) suggesting that Jacobs is probably interpreting faithfully.
If the effect is just to play four semi quavers , why not just write that ? ( other than to take any possible accent off the first semi quaver).
Last edited by teamsaint; 10-02-20, 19:03.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Braunschlag View PostThat cuts both ways of course
That later Bruggen Mozart Trilogy sounds remarkably lush compared to his earlier Mozart Symphonies; 2010 is almost Romantically intoned (which suits 39 especially well... then again, there often was an affectionate, Romantic streak in Bruggen's musical caresses, wasn't there..? Those later OAE Haydn S&D Symphonies...
In his own Mozart Trilogy notes, Tognetti has some very touching, sad yet inspiring recollections of playing under a "very frail" Bruggen "a white-haired guru, with charisma", in the ACO in 1990, a very formative experience for him in Mozart and I suspect much else.......
***
Would many listeners tell, quickly or not, by ear alone that this was on period instruments...?
Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 10-02-20, 19:31.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostNot much listening going on here is there? Anyone for Mozart?
Might be time for me to join Roerhe and fhg and Beef/Felix/Sid aka soon..... a feeling of living on borrowed time here....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by underthecountertenor View PostHe does seem to like talking. And I don't quite get why so many people are so keen to speculate in a way that exonerates him and puts the blame on 'the management.'
In the discussion of the big Bruno Walter box later in the programme, he made a point of referring to the Serkin/Walter recording of the Emperor (which had not been selected for comment by the reviewer, Katy Hamilton), apparently solely in order to say that the pianist was Peter Serkin who had died the previous Saturday aged 72. A crass and crashingly obvious mistake, and one which seems inexplicable coming from someone with the knowledge of classical recording history that he professes. I am still at a loss as to how he could have thought it was Peter and not Rudolf.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostNot much listening going on here is there? Anyone for Mozart?
Might be time for me to join Roerhe and fhg and Beef/Felix/Sid aka soon..... a feeling of living on borrowed time here....
Comment
-
Comment