I was enjoying Iain’s explanation of rubato but of course AMcG had to interrupt and spoil it.
BaL 25.01.20 - Chopin: Four Scherzi
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Alison View PostI was enjoying Iain’s explanation of rubato but of course AMcG had to interrupt and spoil it.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostI'd rather he's stayed, as he's one of the best at Radio 3. It's the twofers that have to go, not the man who's told to do them.
I am sure John Lade, Richard Osborne, Paul Vaughan, Anthony Burton and Jonathan Swain could have done twofers with the reviewers - instead they often did insightful introductions about the pieces to be in BAL and commented afterwards rather than the twofer method of interruption with inanities and talking over the "expert" .
Comment
-
-
Just had a listen to this re-run.
I found it bizarre that the reviewer thought that the HIP Cyril Huvé version (Erard and Pleyel pianos) was well worth considering, but that there wasn't find time amongst all the other discs to let us hear an extract.
Huvé is certainly worth acquiring - and his admirable disc of the Schubert 'Trout' with Hausmusik got top prize some time ago, too, I think.
Comment
-
-
<Although if HD's source is right it is Andrew McGregor who likes twofers as he likes talking>
He might, so it's a pity that as far as this Forum seems to go, many of us do not like his twofer format / talking.
But of course, we're only mere audience, anonymous listeners, so how they hell do we count?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Alison View PostI was enjoying Iain’s explanation of rubato but of course AMcG had to interrupt and spoil it.
I was pleased that Burnside managed to get his own back with a slap-down re the Rubinstein.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by underthecountertenor View PostOn listening again this morning, this struck me as classic McGregor. He gave the literal meaning of rubato, then put Burnside on the spot by asking him, clearly without warning, how he would describe it. He’d already used the obvious lead-in, so Burnside was momentarily blind-sided, but soon found his feet, only to be interrupted by McGregor with a description and a Liszt quote he had clearly had up his sleeve all along. It felt as if he was deliberately trying to demonstrate his cleverness at his guest’s expense.
I was pleased that Burnside managed to get his own back with a slap-down re the Rubinstein.
Comment
-
-
And given that the reviewer is a seasoned broadcaster, a very very fine pianist in his own right, such interruptions are insulting and inexcusable.
The R3 prod team simply do NOT get it. We are not listening for a late breakfast chat over a cup of coffee, but to a careful presentation of researched and meditated judgements.
AMcG's insistence on fiddling and nudging and butting in destroys the very most basic tenet of this format. He has in effect wrecked and undermined it.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by DracoM View PostAnd given that the reviewer is a seasoned broadcaster, a very very fine pianist in his own right, such interruptions are insulting and inexcusable.
The R3 prod team simply do NOT get it. We are not listening for a late breakfast chat over a cup of coffee, but to a careful presentation of researched and meditated judgements.
AMcG's insistence on fiddling and nudging and butting in destroys the very most basic tenet of this format. He has in effect wrecked and undermined it.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by underthecountertenor View PostOn listening again this morning, this struck me as classic McGregor. He gave the literal meaning of rubato, then put Burnside on the spot by asking him, clearly without warning, how he would describe it. He’d already used the obvious lead-in, so Burnside was momentarily blind-sided, but soon found his feet, only to be interrupted by McGregor with a description and a Liszt quote he had clearly had up his sleeve all along. It felt as if he was deliberately trying to demonstrate his cleverness at his guest’s expense.
I was pleased that Burnside managed to get his own back with a slap-down re the Rubinstein.
Comment
-
Comment