When I was in primary school, as a frequent exercise we were played a piece of classical music and we had to write what it suggested to us. I just thought you'd like to know that.
BaL 18.01.20 - Beethoven: Symphony no. 1 in C, Op.21
Collapse
X
-
Oakapple
-
Oakapple
-
Originally posted by Oakapple View PostWhen I was in primary school, as a frequent exercise we were played a piece of classical music and we had to write what it suggested to us. I just thought you'd like to know that.
At my 60’s primary school a piece of classical music was played at each assembly . But with limited albums three tracks kept coming up. Scheherazade, Peter and the Wolf , and Romeo and Juliet. I now literally cannot bear to listen to the first two.....
On thread : Beethoven’s 1st would have been a blessed relief and brought a smile to my face...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Heldenleben View PostThat second Stravinsky quote I am not familiar with but it strikes me as an excellent summation. It is possible to construct quite complex narratives to gloss Beethoven symphonies e.g. Forster’s goblins in the Beethoven 5 section of Howard’s End or the many narratives on the Eroica 1st Movement outlined by Scott Burnham in Chapter 1 of Beethoven Hero. But ultimately the real meaning is in the notes and the the relationship between them. There is nothing wrong with a verbal narrative indeed a lot of musicians use them to help to perform. There is a Vengerov masterclass where one fiendishly difficult violin passage is described as a mouse running up the finger board and then chomping the cheese.
But music like all art has an emotional narrative - something that Cooke tried to nail down in The Language Of Music looking largely at specific musical intervals . Where it gets complicated is that Beethoven has been so influential in constructing that language that it is difficult to disentangle cause and effect. Do the large repetitive harmonic blocks (based on the second part of the opening phrase of the Pastoral ) which build to to such a tremendous climax in the development section represent the elemental side of nature , Beethoven’s emotional response to it , or is it just a superb piece of harmonic development : a working out of a pretty mundane (shepherds pipe? ) tune - who knows? But because of the Pastoral’s all pervasiveness when I hear a similar effect in another work I tend to think “Pastoral.”
The above message reminded me of studying Thomas Mann as part of my university German course. We were doing Doktor Faustus and the lecturer, who was a good pianist, gave us a special extra lecture which took us through the character Wendell Kretschmar's analysis of op 111. (Found a useful paper here). He also illustrated to us non-musicians what he thought was meant by Mann's referring to music as "die Zweideutigkeit als System" (ambiguity as a system) by playing bits of the Appassionata Sonata. Music can take us into transcendent spheres, a realm of ineffability, a seductive spiritual paradise, can for Schopenhauer even be the expression of the pure will. As such, for Mann, it can be dangerously like a disease or diabolical temptation which takes you away from the wholesome real world. Hans Castorp, the sensible boy from Hamburg, previously mainly interested in ocean-going steamships, is thus tempted on the Magic Mountain. Gustav von Aschenbach succumbs fatally to the pure beauty of the youth Tadzio in Venice, in which place, of course, Wagner also found his death. Wagner wrote very little pure music and preferred to set text or to tie the sounds he created directly to archetypes within the human psyche via leitmotivs. He called Beethoven "a sublime and supernatural being".
I enjoy succumbing to the mystery of pure music but my background is linguistic and I most often prefer listen to music tied to text. (My namesake Gurnemanz in Parsifal is a well-intentioned old bloke who happily rambles on and on). The likes of Bob Dylan, Tom Waits, Randy Newman, Lucinda Williams, The Beatles, Joni Mitchell, Cole Porter, Franz Schubert, Kurt Weill, Hugo Wolf, Richard Wagner etc (ie word setters) would figure rather prominently on my Desert Island list. Growing up as a child and in my early teens, vocal music was the only music I really listened to, with the exception of the Shadows. Apache (1960), which I still own and was one of my first singles and Telstar from the Tornados. Nearly all pop and rock is text based. I tend to listen to jazz singers more than pure jazz.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Heldenleben View PostI’m still puzzling though over why Edwin Fischer and Claudio Arrau could come to such wildly varying responses over three Beethoven chords .
I don't think wither approach can be described as "over-thinking" ... after all, they went on to act after/before such thinking by playing the work itself![FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Heldenleben View PostAt my 60’s primary school a piece of classical music was played at each assembly . But with limited albums three tracks kept coming up. Scheherazade, Peter and the Wolf , and Romeo and Juliet. I now literally cannot bear to listen to the first two.....
On thread : Beethoven’s 1st would have been a blessed relief and brought a smile to my face...
Many experiences of School I resented at the time and still do; but I shall forever praise the name of Ben Kirkham for exposing kids to the sound of this unfamiliar and very different Music.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Re post on Barenboim
- By overthinking I mean you don’t need a “story” or a concept to play the movement well.
It’s a very interesting sonata movement - I love the plunge into the minor in the coda with the almost jazzy cycle of fifths syncopated section leading back to the dominant. And then a nice easy chromatic run and a few flashy arpeggios to impress the listener . Just wish I could nail the trickier bits....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Heldenleben View PostBy overthinking I mean you don’t need a “story” or a concept to play the movement well..[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View PostWe may or may not find this "clear" - I find it richly suggestive, and have been thinking about it ever since I read it, and would say that if the statement were more "clear" (in a sort of tabloid sense) it wouldn't have been worth saying in the first place. Nor was RVW's statement "trite", by any means, but touches on questions central to aesthetics. We may (or may not) think we know better, for ourselves, but we cannot dismiss their opinions so easily.
But I'm repeating myself. Jayne, you don't seem willing to give these two composers the credit they deserve for knowing something interesting about the wellspring of their extraordinary art, and trying to put it into words. As the debate started with questions arising from your demand that we should smile along to the Pastoral Symphony, and "all those giggle-and-guffaw-inducing jokes in No.8" (your post #120) we've wandered along a very thorn-strewn path, and so I suggest we leave it at that!
I never "demanded" anything, only described or suggested or responded (impassioned as ever...), I elaborated my continuously developing views and comments further and deeper and broader as I could, and paid Stravinsky the "credit" of quoting him very fully indeed - more than you were prepared to do, offering instead your own speculative gloss/paraphrase.... as for RVW's statement...a comment "on questions central to aesthetics"?... some forcing of the text going on in your own comment upon it, surely....
Still, many more views today ....... very pleased and fascinated to read them...Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 22-01-20, 18:57.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostOWA/Haselböck a great new kid on the block for me this year...recorded in the gorgeously painted and ornamented Palais Niederösterreich, one of Vienna's most important concert halls after 1813, where all 9 symphonies were performed from 1819-27, in the "Concerts Spirituels"...Don’t cry for me
I go where music was born
J S Bach 1685-1750
Comment
-
Comment