BaL 23.11.19 - Haydn: Symphony no. 102

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ferneyhoughgeliebte
    Gone fishin'
    • Sep 2011
    • 30163

    Originally posted by Bryn View Post
    No, the one mentioned in the meander from the thread from which the quoted post was drawn. :p
    Best of luck creating an oxbow from that meander.
    Feldman's For John Cage, mewond'reth?
    [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

    Comment

    • Bryn
      Banned
      • Mar 2007
      • 24688

      Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
      Feldman's For John Cage, mewond'reth?
      'sright. This time with no car crash to deal with. I wonder of Haydn ever has a coach and horses driven through or past any of his performances?

      Comment

      • Pianorak
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 3128

        Originally posted by HighlandDougie View Post
        It’s an error as Sarah Walker’s recommended ‘modern instrument’ version was Sir Colin Davis and the KCO, not Harnoncourt.
        Many thanks, HD. Faith in SW restored!

        Jayne: Love the Harnoncourt Brahms symphonies - and much else besides.
        My life, each morning when I dress, is four and twenty hours less. (J Richardson)

        Comment

        • cloughie
          Full Member
          • Dec 2011
          • 22206

          Originally posted by Bryn View Post
          'sright. This time with no car crash to deal with. I wonder of Haydn ever has a coach and horses driven through or past any of his performances?
          A good reason to write the Hornsignal!

          Comment

          • HighlandDougie
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 3108

            Originally posted by silvestrione View Post
            But alas, for some of us, we are just allergic to Harnoncourt, even if we're not quite sure why. Is it too calculated, unspontaneous, every note thought through? Possibly, but then I like Michelangeli, of whom the same could be said.....
            And of many others - HvK anyone? I think that describing Harnoncourt's interpretations as, "sludge", (defined as, "thick, soft, wet mud or a substance that looks like it") is, as they say here in France, "une bêtise". One might not like his approach - but sludge? No, never. I cite as my case against such a frankly silly description his swansong: the recordings of Beethoven 4 & 5 with the VCM. Occasionally controversial but full of life and a love of the music. I'm strongly tempted to think of music and of conductors against whom the insult, "sludge", might be levelled - ooh, all those worthy but dull symphonies dutifully released by Lyrita and Daniel Barenboim's later Bruckner symphony recordings. But it's probably the second glass of wine talking.

            Comment

            • cloughie
              Full Member
              • Dec 2011
              • 22206

              Originally posted by HighlandDougie View Post
              And of many others - HvK anyone? I think that describing Harnoncourt's interpretations as, "sludge", (defined as, "thick, soft, wet mud or a substance that looks like it") is, as they say here in France, "une bêtise". One might not like his approach - but sludge? No, never. I cite as my case against such a frankly silly description his swansong: the recordings of Beethoven 4 & 5 with the VCM. Occasionally controversial but full of life and a love of the music. I'm strongly tempted to think of music and of conductors against whom the insult, "sludge", might be levelled - ooh, all those worthy but dull symphonies dutifully released by Lyrita and Daniel Barenboim's later Bruckner symphony recordings. But it's probably the second glass of wine talking.
              Vaclav Neumann rarely lights my candle!

              Comment

              • jayne lee wilson
                Banned
                • Jul 2011
                • 10711

                Originally posted by silvestrione View Post
                But alas, for some of us, we are just allergic to Harnoncourt, even if we're not quite sure why. Is it too calculated, unspontaneous, every note thought through? Possibly, but then I like Michelangeli, of whom the same could be said.....
                One last try?


                Despite my very strong preference for CO/HIPPs recordings of Schumann/Schubert, I still cite this as one of the all-time great recordings of either....

                Comment

                • cloughie
                  Full Member
                  • Dec 2011
                  • 22206

                  Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
                  One last try?


                  Despite my very strong preference for CO/HIPPs recordings of Schumann/Schubert, I still cite this as one of the all-time great recordings of either....
                  Looks like this thread has strayed away from Haydn again. Perhaps we need another diversionary supp thread: Conductors we don’t rate or do we?

                  Is the Schumann 1841 or 1851?

                  Comment

                  • silvestrione
                    Full Member
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 1725

                    Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
                    One last try?


                    Despite my very strong preference for CO/HIPPs recordings of Schumann/Schubert, I still cite this as one of the all-time great recordings of either....
                    OK, I've ordered a used copy! After all, I've followed up on many of your recommendations, and only been disappointed once (well, one and a half times!).

                    Comment

                    • MickyD
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 4835

                      I like the fact that Goodman employs the fortepiano in his recording.

                      He was following Hogwood, who did the same about ten years earlier in his four recordings of London Symphonies 94, 96, 100 and 104, and even went on to employ it in his early Beethoven recordings. As Sarah Walker said, what a pity he never got round to doing the other London symphonies - I love his treatment of those he did.

                      Comment

                      • gurnemanz
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 7416

                        Grateful for above comments on Goodman/Haydn which nudged me towards the only CD I have with that combination. It must have been an early purchase in that medium - Symphonies 93, 94, 95. It states: "recorded with generous assistance of SEEBOARD", the latter long defunct but Hyperion still thriving. Listened this afternoon with great pleasure, having not played it for ages. He goes really pianissimo just before the "surprise". I will get around to listening to their 102.

                        As for Harnoncourt and sludge. I've only seen him once so can't really generalise, but his Beethoven Missa Solemnis at the Barbican in 2012 would not confirm that assessment. Aged 82, he turned in a profoundly moving and beautifully radiant rendition of this stupendous work, along with Concertgebouw Amsterdam, Netherlands Radio Choir and excellent, well-balanced soloists placed behind the orchestra - Marlis Petersen, Elisabeth Kulman, Werner Güra and Gerald Finley. At the end he was presented with the Royal Philharmonic Society’s Gold Medal and made a short speech. Not an occasion I would have wanted to miss.

                        Comment

                        • Eine Alpensinfonie
                          Host
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 20576

                          Originally posted by MickyD View Post
                          I like the fact that Goodman employs the fortepiano in his recording.
                          Even though there isn't one in the score. Haydn often directed from the violin - a much better idea, as the violin IS in the score.

                          Comment

                          • Eine Alpensinfonie
                            Host
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 20576

                            Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                            I wonder of Haydn ever has a coach and horses driven through or past any of his performances?
                            Does a chandelier count?

                            Comment

                            • Bryn
                              Banned
                              • Mar 2007
                              • 24688

                              Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                              Does a chandelier count?
                              I reckon so. Good job the audience crowded forward to watch him directing from the 'fortepiano', eh?

                              Comment

                              • Barbirollians
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 11771

                                Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                                I reckon so. Good job the audience crowded forward to watch him directing from the 'fortepiano', eh?
                                Harnoncourt - a mixed bag for me not a baroque favourite and I disliked his feted Beethoven cycle . Yet his Missa Solemnus is outstanding and he is surely one of the greatest Schumann conductors.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X