Originally posted by Bryn
View Post
BaL 23.11.19 - Haydn: Symphony no. 102
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by HighlandDougie View PostIt’s an error as Sarah Walker’s recommended ‘modern instrument’ version was Sir Colin Davis and the KCO, not Harnoncourt.
Jayne: Love the Harnoncourt Brahms symphonies - and much else besides.My life, each morning when I dress, is four and twenty hours less. (J Richardson)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by silvestrione View PostBut alas, for some of us, we are just allergic to Harnoncourt, even if we're not quite sure why. Is it too calculated, unspontaneous, every note thought through? Possibly, but then I like Michelangeli, of whom the same could be said.....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by HighlandDougie View PostAnd of many others - HvK anyone? I think that describing Harnoncourt's interpretations as, "sludge", (defined as, "thick, soft, wet mud or a substance that looks like it") is, as they say here in France, "une bêtise". One might not like his approach - but sludge? No, never. I cite as my case against such a frankly silly description his swansong: the recordings of Beethoven 4 & 5 with the VCM. Occasionally controversial but full of life and a love of the music. I'm strongly tempted to think of music and of conductors against whom the insult, "sludge", might be levelled - ooh, all those worthy but dull symphonies dutifully released by Lyrita and Daniel Barenboim's later Bruckner symphony recordings. But it's probably the second glass of wine talking.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by silvestrione View PostBut alas, for some of us, we are just allergic to Harnoncourt, even if we're not quite sure why. Is it too calculated, unspontaneous, every note thought through? Possibly, but then I like Michelangeli, of whom the same could be said.....
Despite my very strong preference for CO/HIPPs recordings of Schumann/Schubert, I still cite this as one of the all-time great recordings of either....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
Is the Schumann 1841 or 1851?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
Comment
-
-
I like the fact that Goodman employs the fortepiano in his recording.
He was following Hogwood, who did the same about ten years earlier in his four recordings of London Symphonies 94, 96, 100 and 104, and even went on to employ it in his early Beethoven recordings. As Sarah Walker said, what a pity he never got round to doing the other London symphonies - I love his treatment of those he did.
Comment
-
-
Grateful for above comments on Goodman/Haydn which nudged me towards the only CD I have with that combination. It must have been an early purchase in that medium - Symphonies 93, 94, 95. It states: "recorded with generous assistance of SEEBOARD", the latter long defunct but Hyperion still thriving. Listened this afternoon with great pleasure, having not played it for ages. He goes really pianissimo just before the "surprise". I will get around to listening to their 102.
As for Harnoncourt and sludge. I've only seen him once so can't really generalise, but his Beethoven Missa Solemnis at the Barbican in 2012 would not confirm that assessment. Aged 82, he turned in a profoundly moving and beautifully radiant rendition of this stupendous work, along with Concertgebouw Amsterdam, Netherlands Radio Choir and excellent, well-balanced soloists placed behind the orchestra - Marlis Petersen, Elisabeth Kulman, Werner Güra and Gerald Finley. At the end he was presented with the Royal Philharmonic Society’s Gold Medal and made a short speech. Not an occasion I would have wanted to miss.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostI reckon so. Good job the audience crowded forward to watch him directing from the 'fortepiano', eh?
Comment
-
Comment