BaL 15.06.19 - Elgar: Violin Sonata in E minor, Op. 82

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • verismissimo
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 2957

    Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
    I'm sure he was a good player when younger
    but (aside from the other aspects of his personality) why was he so celebrated as a violinist for all of his life ?
    When I was a child in the 1950s, the self-evident answer to the question, 'Who do you think you are …?', was either

    a. Sterling Moss,
    b. Stanley Matthews, or
    c. Yehudi Menuhin, depending on context.

    Were there others? Is there current usage with new exemplars?

    Comment

    • LMcD
      Full Member
      • Sep 2017
      • 8717

      Originally posted by verismissimo View Post
      When I was a child in the 1950s, the self-evident answer to the question, 'Who do you think you are …?', was either

      a. Sterling Moss,
      b. Stanley Matthews, or
      c. Yehudi Menuhin, depending on context.

      Were there others? Is there current usage with new exemplars?
      Was he the financial consultant who had a famous racing driver, named after a Scottish castle, for a brother?

      Comment

      • edashtav
        Full Member
        • Jul 2012
        • 3672

        Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
        He struggled in later years but I suggest the following as a brief corrective to the lousy fiddle player jibe .

        1947 Beethoven With Furtwangler

        1943 Brahms with Boult

        Early 1930s Paganini 1 with Monteux

        That is leaving aside his most famous recording.
        Spot on, Barbirollians.

        Comment

        • Mal
          Full Member
          • Dec 2016
          • 892

          Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
          In a difficult position? It’s his programme, so he can more or less do what he wants, within reason. Saying nothing for 50 minutes shouldn’t be so difficult.
          It's the controller's programme! And he's likely to give AMcG an earful if he just goes silent... he's on record as saying he likes this dialogue format. So if AMcG wants to keep his nice job he has to show willing.



          Questioner: The Building a Library segment of CD Review (on Saturdays) gets much praise – but some readers say the recorded, scripted editions are immeasurably better than the rambling live discussions.

          Alan Davey (controller of BBC Radio 3): There’s room for both. We get a lot of positive feedback for live discussions, if not all the time. In terms of Building a Library, it’s such a mammoth task our people take on in finding the best version of a piece, and it’s always going to be serious and detailed and carefully thought through. If we get the right guests, the level of erudition will be high. And the exchange of views is interesting. The sense of liveliness that brings is welcome.

          Actually this comment indicates that Davey doesn't know the format of the programme! There are no "guests" there is only one "guest", so there can be no "exchange of views" because the "level of erudition" is almost always too low... AMcG not having the necessary specialist knowledge in most cases...

          Hmmm.... the controller of BBC Radio 3 not knowing the format of his flagship programme? Who controls the controller? Maybe we should write to him and complain...

          Q: Which are your own don’t-miss programmes on Radio 3?
          AD: I’ve listened to Composer of the Week for years and years. I never miss In Tune because you never know who’s going to be on. As well as Live in Concert every night... [Note, BAL is not mentioned!]

          Comment

          • Mal
            Full Member
            • Dec 2016
            • 892

            Davey sounds like quite an attractive character:

            Charlotte Higgins: A passionate music fan who has spent his career in bureaucracies, Davey is the right man for the job, but he will need to think carefully about who now runs the Proms


            BUT:

            "The big missing element from Davey’s CV is broadcast experience, which to some might make him a peculiar choice for the job at all; it certainly means that he is an unknown quantity in terms of what we will hear when we hit the Radio 3 dial in future..."

            Comment

            • Eine Alpensinfonie
              Host
              • Nov 2010
              • 20576

              Originally posted by Mal View Post
              Davey sounds like quite an attractive character:

              Charlotte Higgins: A passionate music fan who has spent his career in bureaucracies, Davey is the right man for the job, but he will need to think carefully about who now runs the Proms


              BUT:

              "The big missing element from Davey’s CV is broadcast experience, which to some might make him a peculiar choice for the job at all; it certainly means that he is an unknown quantity in terms of what we will hear when we hit the Radio 3 dial in future..."
              Interesting stuff indeed. There doesn’t really seem to be a coherent plan.
              Roger Wright Plus, perhaps?

              Comment

              • Stanfordian
                Full Member
                • Dec 2010
                • 9332

                Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                Perhaps John Humphrys is his mentor.
                So true!

                Comment

                • Mal
                  Full Member
                  • Dec 2016
                  • 892

                  Originally posted by pastoralguy View Post
                  Although David Owen Norris was very explicit in pointing out Miss-readings in the piano part, I was surprised he didn't comment on Vengarov's mistake 3 bars after figure 11 in the first movement where he plays a simplified version of what Elgar wrote. He completely misses out the top harmonic and plays a stopped note two octaves below. Most odd for a player of his supreme abilities!
                  Yes, Brautigam came in for some heavy, and repeated, criticism. But Vengerov did come in for some general slagging from DON, and he gave technical detail on one other mistake. DON also indicated there were too many mistakes, by too many players, to mention them all in detail! He also made a good stab at reasons why they make these mistakes... doing too much, not enough time... which I guess would be the same excuses for many CD reviewers... and we are left to buy dross in a state of ignorance all round... So thank goodness for DON, who obviously does listen to all the notes, and knows what they should be!

                  Comment

                  • Master Jacques
                    Full Member
                    • Feb 2012
                    • 1972

                    Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
                    947 Beethoven With Furtwangler
                    1943 Brahms with Boult
                    Early 1930s Paganini 1 with Monteux
                    That is leaving aside his most famous recording.
                    Please could I put in another couple, please? His Mendelssohn Concerto under his teacher Enescu, and Enescu's own 3rd Violin Sonata (with sister Hephzibah on piano). Both are treasures, in the way of golden musicianship over idle virtuosity and/or Rolls Royce power.

                    Comment

                    • Tony Halstead
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 1717

                      Originally posted by Mal View Post
                      Yes, Brautigam came in for some heavy, and repeated, criticism. But Vengerov did come in for some general slagging from DON, and he gave technical detail on one other mistake. DON also indicated there were too many mistakes, by too many players, to mention them all in detail! He also made a good stab at reasons why they make these mistakes... doing too much, not enough time... which I guess would be the same excuses for many CD reviewers... and we are left to buy dross in a state of ignorance all round... So thank goodness for DON, who obviously does listen to all the notes, and knows what they should be!
                      There is a new 'Elgar critical edition' publication. I am wondering whether the 'Brautigam/ Van Keulen' recording used this!
                      Having worked with Mr Brautigam many, many times in concerts, most particularly at the EHF Bridgnorth, I can't quite believe that he would have made mistakes with the text. I have ordered the new edition and look forward to its arrival!
                      Last edited by Tony Halstead; 18-06-19, 08:09.

                      Comment

                      • ardcarp
                        Late member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 11102

                        I did wonder. Record producers are pretty darned sharp eared as well, and it would be strange for so many 'wrong notes' to slip through.

                        Comment

                        • Eine Alpensinfonie
                          Host
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 20576

                          Originally posted by Tony View Post
                          There is a new 'Elgar critical edition' publication. I am wondering whether the 'Brautigam/ Van Keulen' recording used this!
                          Having worked with Mr Brautigam many, many times in concerts/ most particularly at the EHF Bridgnorth, I can't quite believe that he would have made mistakes with the text. I have ordered the new edition and look forward to its arrival!
                          Do keep us posted on this.

                          Comment

                          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                            Gone fishin'
                            • Sep 2011
                            • 30163

                            It does seem strange that a Musician of Brautigam's calibre should have made so many errors in his playing - but the CD was recorded over 12 years ago (in February, 2007): would the "new Critical Edition" have been available then? (And, if so, why has it taken - or, rather, "is it" taking - so long to reach the public?)
                            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                            Comment

                            • Tony Halstead
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 1717

                              Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                              It does seem strange that a Musician of Brautigam's calibre should have made so many errors in his playing - but the CD was recorded over 12 years ago (in February, 2007): would the "new Critical Edition" have been available then? (And, if so, why has it taken - or, rather, "is it" taking - so long to reach the public?)
                              As I understand it, Volume 37 of the 'Complete Edition', containing every scrap of Elgar's violin music, edited by Clive Brown, was published in 2007.

                              Comment

                              • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                                Gone fishin'
                                • Sep 2011
                                • 30163

                                Originally posted by Tony View Post
                                As I understand it, Volume 37 of the 'Complete Edition', containing every scrap of Elgar's violin music, edited by Clive Brown, was published in 2007.
                                Aha! Then I can only repeat Alpie's #117


                                (With, of course, apologies to Alpie, who doesn't like repeats.)
                                [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X