Was there ever any litigation over Hattogate?
BaL 16.03.19 - Brahms: Piano Concerto no. 2 in B flat
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostI don't think so. Following Robert von Bahr's letter to the June 2007 edition of The Gramophone re. his intention not to sue, I think all others affected decided to follow suit.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostGilels/BPO/Jochum, Tirimo/LPO/Levi, and Serkin/Cleveland O/Szell here.
Gilels/BPO/Jochum seems to get a good press, how would you compare it to the other two? If you had to choose only one out of these three, which would you choose?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mal View PostI gave Tirimo/LPO/Levi to the charity shop, about ten years ago, mainly because the sound quality wasn't very good. But I'm slightly regretting it; the performance was quite ravishing. Has it been re-mastered? I replaced it with Serkin/Szell, but I find it too athletic. OK, it's quite exciting, but I want more than that. More warmth, more lyrcism, more like LPO/Levi. The sound, also, isn't that great,... again... maybe I need the latest remastering...
Gilels/BPO/Jochum seems to get a good press, how would you compare it to the other two? If you had to choose only one out of these three, which would you choose?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by HighlandDougie View PostWhy don't you try Leon Fleisher/Cleveland/Szell? I'm not sure how streamable it is (or it's available as a twofer with PC 1 - remastered, I think - which can be picked up "used" on Amazon for a relatively modest sum). A fine performance which I certainly prefer to Serkin or Gilels (his PC2 is a bit of a disappointment by comparison with PC1, imv).
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by HighlandDougie View PostWhy don't you try Leon Fleisher/Cleveland/Szell? I'm not sure how streamable it is (or it's available as a twofer with PC 1 - remastered, I think - which can be picked up "used" on Amazon for a relatively modest sum). A fine performance which I certainly prefer to Serkin or Gilels (his PC2 is a bit of a disappointment by comparison with PC1, imv).
I found Freire/Chailly easy to turn off.
Gilels/Jochum/BPO is a glowing, warm, passionate account. I guess it partly depends what you are looking for, and one's particular taste; I'm (mostly) looking for slow, lyrical, ruminating in #2, especially after Serkin & Freire's jagged, volcanic accounts. Also, the beauty of sound generated by the BPO, here, is breath taking, as is their musicality.
There are two Gilels performances, Rob Cowan says the second ( Gilels/Jochum/BPO) swops some "finesse and extra breadth" for some of the "fire" of Gilels/Chicago/Reiner. I'm liking the finesse and breadth, but wondering if more fire would be good...
There's a 2016 release of Fleisher/Szell and it sounds great on Amazon Unlimited! Now I'm having trouble turning this one off as well... it's a hard life :)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mal View PostI gave Tirimo/LPO/Levi to the charity shop, about ten years ago, mainly because the sound quality wasn't very good. But I'm slightly regretting it; the performance was quite ravishing. Has it been re-mastered? I replaced it with Serkin/Szell, but I find it too athletic. OK, it's quite exciting, but I want more than that. More warmth, more lyrcism, more like LPO/Levi. The sound, also, isn't that great,... again... maybe I need the latest remastering...
Gilels/BPO/Jochum seems to get a good press, how would you compare it to the other two? If you had to choose only one out of these three, which would you choose?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostI'll need to listen to them again to decide....but more than likely the Serkin, though possibly because of the 'first version I got to know' syndrome! It was in a 2LP gatefold set, much cherished and played when I was a student in Canada (many records I had in my collection were North American CBS issues). It wasn't the first version I got on CD, though, which might suggest that it's a performance I wanted to be reunited with.
I like the sense of abandonment and thrill that it portrays: the other two sound a bit too 'safe' in comparison.
(My pocket score is dated 10 August 1979, bought at Tanglewood, where I had gone to hear Serkin Junior play the piece: at least, I think it was number 2 not number 1, though I bought both scores there that day!)
PS: Yes, the Tanglewood archive tells me that it was number 2.
Comment
-
-
Surprised to find so little mention of the 1948 Pristine Horowitz/Toscanini I mentioned above. Yes you need some tolerance for the SQ, and the impulsive audience diving in before the movements end to offer loud acclaim; but it changed my Brahmsian Life and it could change yours....
overviewfb55cd020f0643f08418183279e63a5fBRAHMS Piano Concerto No. 2Recorded live in 1948Duration 44:23Vladimir Horowitz, piano NBC Symphony Orchestra conducted by Arturo Toscanini 578a9379d1e540bd96d26f03a79628d9review_titlefb55cd020f0643f08418183279e63a5f578a9379d1e540bd96d26f03a79628d9review_quotefb55cd020f0643f08418Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 15-03-19, 21:42.
Comment
-
-
One thing that has always puzzled me about the opening of Brahms 2 . All the right hand notes of the piano opening - bar the first two Bflat left hand notes - are marked staccato -albeit with a slur . There is no pedal indication until the 6/4 chord at end of phrase . Yet every one seems to play it legato often with pedal . Is there a recording with it played as indicated ? Are there even recordings where the horn player plays the triplet staccato / mezzo staccato and the pianist smooths it all over ?
Comment
-
-
This BAL is an absolute disgrace.
Tom Service all about Tom Service, wordy, me-me-me notice me being clever with words.....oh, yes, the Brahms? Was that what I was in this BAL for?
Yes, it is a v.diff job - huge number of recordings, so ......get ON with it......and I am still listening as I write. All Service and less Brahms.
Comment
-
Comment