'Winner' identified in list, but I've ordered a cheap s/h copy of the Zimmermann.
BaL 12.1.19 - Prokofiev: Violin concerto 1 in D
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostAh - I'm more of DracoM's opinion - that the "imaginative and telling choice of descriptive words and phrases" is (to paraphrase her own description of the Chung recording) more concerned with Molleson than with Prokofiev.
Heigh-ho; chacun a son wotsit, and all that ...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostSeconded. I have a feeling that, whatever it turns out to be, I will go with her recommendation. There again, I already have the Zimmerman, so it's just the Frang to get.
Just checked - it's coupled with the Sibelius. That is superb IIRC. So go for Frang anyway - as well as others, perhaps!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by underthecountertenor View PostI thought that she had, and conveyed, a deep knowledge of composer and work, and a perceptive ear.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post'Winner' identified in list, but I've ordered a cheap s/h copy of the Zimmermann.
That purpose being, of course, to persuade us to shell out more beans, however small, and add to the pressure on our already groaning shelves.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostOh, absolutely - I have no doubt that she'd get the correct location of the Nielsen's sunrise! - it's totally a case of my personal dislike of the stream of adjectives and similes that is her personal style (and which I've mentioned on a couple of H&N).
Comment
-
-
Richard Tarleton
I just found myself wondering, when she said the KWC/Previn put KWC centre stage rather than Prokoviev (more or less), what does that actually mean? Too forwardly miked, or was it an interpretation thing, and how did this manifest itself?
Comment
-
Originally posted by underthecountertenor View PostI’d say that most of what she has said so far has been pretty much spot-on, with a lot of acute observations, and an imaginative and telling choice of descriptive words and phrases.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostOh, absolutely - I have no doubt that she'd get the correct location of the Nielsen's sunrise! - it's totally a case of my personal dislike of the stream of adjectives and similes that is her personal style (and which I've mentioned on a couple of H&N).
And I found her comment about KWC (with Previn) totally without foundation, technically or musically. Never did a performance sound less egotistical, or more at the service of the piece, in my opinion. Baffling...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View PostI just found myself wondering, when she said the KWC/Previn put KWC centre stage rather than Prokoviev (more or less), what does that actually mean? Too forwardly miked, or was it an interpretation thing, and how did this manifest itself?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View PostI just found myself wondering, when she said the KWC/Previn put KWC centre stage rather than Prokoviev (more or less), what does that actually mean? Too forwardly miked, or was it an interpretation thing, and how did this manifest itself?
Comment
-
-
I felt Kate had a 'listener-friendly' style....and I rather liked it. She clearly preferred soloists who didn't foreground themselves too much, and she (rightly IMO) spent some time talking about orchestral matters. I rather agree that, as I heard it...
Zimmerman sounded good, and I expected Frang to as well, but it seemed to me that the balance was wrong. The violinist is very far back, yet there was clearly (IMO) some tinkering with the balance, as "suddenly" some woodwind instruments leapt to the fore.
Comment
-
Comment