Originally posted by DracoM
View Post
1 The main reviewer has listened to all the recordings under consideration, so chipping in from someone who has has presumably not is of limited relevance.
2 The main reviewer has presumably planned a coherent route through the review, so nudging along the way should not be necessary.
3 I have always seen this as an essay in which one person presents a personal view, so it is superfluous to have someone else chipping in with a twopennyworth.
4 I find the dialogue (chat) format actually interrupts the natural flow, detracts from the cogency of points being made and wastes time.
Comment