Originally posted by Prommer
View Post
BaL 3.03.18 - Mahler: Symphony no. 7
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostI must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
I must pay attention in class.
Comment
-
-
I think that is unfair about Bernstein . For some conductors the recordings are about how marvellous and novel they are or what splendid new insights they think they bring . Two very different but to my ears self regarding conductors gone to mind- Benjamin Zander and Currentzis.
I don't think that ever applied to Bernstein.Sometines his attempts to squeeze more out of a score led to diminishing returns but I doubt it was ever about him.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostI think that is unfair about Bernstein . For some conductors the recordings are about how marvellous and novel they are or what splendid new insights they think they bring . Two very different but to my ears self regarding conductors gone to mind- Benjamin Zander and Currentzis.
I don't think that ever applied to Bernstein.Sometines his attempts to squeeze more out of a score led to diminishing returns but I doubt it was ever about him.
Well put, Barbs. Again, Jansons springs to mind when cite Conductors who want us to know it’s “their Mahler”.
LB always tried to identify with the Composer as much as possible. With Mahler, there was a considerable amount that they had in common, and I think LB can be forgiven if he identified a bit to closely.
We know that Mahler’s music can withstand widely divergent approaches, and LB Art may be a bit to over the top for some British tastes. Heart on sleeve has usually not been the preferred English brand of expression. It may be more of a Jewish characteristic, and I suspect that LB owed some of his Mahler sensibility to his tutelage under Bruno Walter
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View Post
Well put, Barbs. Again, Jansons springs to mind when cite Conductors who want us to know it’s “their Mahler”.
LB always tried to identify with the Composer as much as possible. With Mahler, there was a considerable amount that they had in common, and I think LB can be forgiven if he identified a bit to closely.
We know that Mahler’s music can withstand widely divergent approaches, and LB Art may be a bit to over the top for some British tastes. Heart on sleeve has usually not been the preferred English brand of expression. It may be more of a Jewish characteristic, and I suspect that LB owed some of his Mahler sensibility to his tutelage under Bruno Walter
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View Post
Well put, Barbs. Again, Jansons springs to mind when cite Conductors who want us to know it’s “their Mahler”.
LB always tried to identify with the Composer as much as possible. With Mahler, there was a considerable amount that they had in common, and I think LB can be forgiven if he identified a bit to closely.
We know that Mahler’s music can withstand widely divergent approaches, and LB Art may be a bit to over the top for some British tastes. Heart on sleeve has usually not been the preferred English brand of expression. It may be more of a Jewish characteristic, and I suspect that LB owed some of his Mahler sensibility to his tutelage under Bruno Walter
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View Post
Well put, Barbs. Again, Jansons springs to mind when cite Conductors who want us to know it’s “their Mahler”.
LB always tried to identify with the Composer as much as possible. With Mahler, there was a considerable amount that they had in common, and I think LB can be forgiven if he identified a bit to closely.
We know that Mahler’s music can withstand widely divergent approaches, and LB Art may be a bit to over the top for some British tastes. Heart on sleeve has usually not been the preferred English brand of expression. It may be more of a Jewish characteristic, and I suspect that LB owed some of his Mahler sensibility to his tutelage under Bruno Walter
Also Bergonzi sadly not . I agree with you about Bruno Walter - his Mahler recordings are touchstones for me . The Columbia 1st , the NYPO 2nd with Maureen Forrester, the 1947 Fifth and the two Mahler Nines let alone the Ferrier/Patzak Das Lied and more recently the live Das Lied with Forrester and Lewis.
He seems to have declared the Sixth as too dark for him . Apparently , according to an appreciation in Gramophone I think ,after his death in 1962 a Mahler 3 was planned and a Bruckner 8 !
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View Post
Well put, Barbs. Again, Jansons springs to mind when cite Conductors who want us to know it’s “their Mahler”.
LB always tried to identify with the Composer as much as possible. With Mahler, there was a considerable amount that they had in common, and I think LB can be forgiven if he identified a bit to closely.
We know that Mahler’s music can withstand widely divergent approaches, and LB Art may be a bit to over the top for some British tastes. Heart on sleeve has usually not been the preferred English brand of expression. It may be more of a Jewish characteristic, and I suspect that LB owed some of his Mahler sensibility to his tutelage under Bruno WalterI will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostJust as BeefO forgot Lennie (and the remastering on that boxed set is, as he mentions, a thing of wonder), HighDoug reminds me that I forgot the Abravenal[sic], which, if not reaching the starry heights of my favourites, is a terrific performance of the work - for years the only one I could afford.
HD is also correct in singling out the Descant issue of the Horenstein: the recorded sound of this magnificent Live performance requires some tolerance - but reports on Amazon about the BBC Legends reissue suggests that the Beeb have made things worse (so emptor all caveats if the lower price for the used copy is tempting).
Abbado/Chicago ... I need to listen to this again: it never rocked my boat in all the times I played it, and was one of the few discs I didn't regret getting rid of. (Abbado conducted the only Live performance of the work I've ever attended - in the Barbican with the LSO in the early '80s. I was deeply unimpressed - although Caliban [who, unbeknown to me, was also at that concert] had exactly the opposite response.)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bergonzi View PostAND Bruno Walter was in my opinion (and still is) the greatest Mahler interpreter. Sadly I do not think he recorded the 7th Symphony.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by HighlandDougie View PostAnd, if I may be forgiven the pedantry, Leonard Bernstein's formal tutelage was courtesy of Fritz Reiner, Serge Koussevitzky and, significantly with regard to Mahler, Dimitri Mitropoulous, rather than courtesy of Bruno Walter. LB did, of course, get his big break with the NYPO in 1943 when Walter was ill - and Walter gave him some tips on how to handle the orchestra. I don't have Nigel Simeone's LB's Letters to hand so I may be completely wrong but I don't recall from them that LB was much influenced by Walter in terms of musical interpretation.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
Comment