If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
BaL 17.02.18 - Haydn: String Quartet in G minor (Op 20 No 3)
I did actually feel and think at the time that it felt like being in a lesson.Also that some rather elaborate but unilluminating language was used , ( and hand grenades should never be used to describe music ! ) where something more forensic might have filled the air time.
I felt the opposite -- that Helen Wallace's comments were illuminating of an area of the repertoire of which I'm rather more ignorant than I'd like to be, and that her language was never "elaborate" or unnecessarily convoluted -- but concise and to the point, in fact.
Last edited by Maclintick; 17-02-18, 19:41.
Reason: sense
I don't know if we are quite on the same wavelength here, but isn't fashion inescapable? The wheel turns and what was once loved becomes detested........
I don't know if we are quite on the same wavelength here, but isn't fashion inescapable? The wheel turns and what was once loved becomes detested........
No progress, in other words. Just change.
I agree. Change. Things move on . Progress. But I'm not being judgemental. When things progress, I don't know if they improve. In fact I'm unconcerned with that question.
I felt the opposite -- that Helen Wallace's comments were illuminating of an area of the repertoire of which I'm rather more ignorant than I'd like to be, and that her language was never "elaborate" or unnecessarily convoluted -- but concise and to the point, in fact.
Just to be clear, I wasn't suggesting that her comments were not illuminating overall, just that some of her descriptive language and phrases didn't really add anything , for me,whereas her more analytical comments certainly did illuminate.
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I agree. Change. Things move on . Progress. But I'm not being judgemental. When things progress, I don't know if they improve. In fact I'm unconcerned with that question.
I think we agree.......though I take the word "progress" to imply improvement. I could be wrong, of course.........
I think this was a good BaL - mainly in that the various differing qualities were well-illustrated, in such a way as to enable listeners to make their own choices, with validity. For example, I for one, was very much drawn to the Hagen and the London Haydn quartets recordings, in preference to some the period instrument recordings, in which I found a little bit too much show of individual displays of virtuosity, of which I am not totally convinced would have been the 'fashion' at the time.... (now there's a potential hornets' nest!)
Of course, I know I am making huge generalisations, but they are my summarised observations, and we all take away our own unique enlightenments from excellent BaLs, as this one was IMVHO, that is.
I think this was a good BaL - mainly in that the various differing qualities were well-illustrated, in such a way as to enable listeners to make their own choices, with validity.
Up to a point, M'Lud -- Things don't always move on beneficially...I have occasionally infuriated superiors who extol the virtues of "change" by opining that change is inevitable, but progressis optional...
Comment