Originally posted by Petrushka
View Post
BaL 16.12.17 - Schubert: Piano Sonata no. 21 in B flat D960
Collapse
X
-
Richard Tarleton
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostRe Richter, when compiling the list, I wasn't sure how many versions he recorded, but there do appear to be at least two.
Comment
-
-
Norris can be amusing and his Chord of the week was the only item worth bothering with on the truly execrable Proms Plus. However, there is a real sense with his BALs of not seeing the woods for the trees. I have my doubts therefore that this of all piano works will be done justice. In short, I fear he's not a classics DON.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sir Velo View PostNorris can be amusing and his Chord of the week was the only item worth bothering with on the truly execrable Proms Plus. However, there is a real sense with his BALs of not seeing the woods for the trees. I have my doubts therefore that this of all piano works will be done justice. In short, I fear he's not a classics DON.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostI don't have any Schubert piano sonata recordings, but I do have the volumes in sheet music form, which is perfect for me, as they are more playable than the sonatas of certain other composers, so I can play them on a modern piano, omit exposition repeats and even miss out a few notes, with having to anticipate disapproving sneers. And if I do perform one or more in public, I'd have bigger issues on my mind.
Among my favourites are Schnabel, Curzon, Kempff, Richter (EMI), Lupu, Pires, Sokolov, Kovacevitch, and most recently Zimerman, who has gone to the trouble of adapting the keyboard of his Steinway* especially to play Schubert. Mark Lowther, now on, has just quoted Sir Adrian Boult noticing that every time he heard Elgar conduct Gerontius it sounded different, particularly regarding tempi. Every time I work my way through D960 at the piano is a new and life-enhancing experience. To own and listen to a single recording of this masterpiece would be unthinkable. BAL done properly gives us a guided Spotify-like survey from where we can investigate further.
* Re-reading his note, the piano maker is not actually identified but is a ‘normal piano’ with a keyboard he apparently made himself: “It is designed to create qualities Schubert would have known in his instruments. Compared to a modern grand piano, the hammer strikes a different point of the string, enhancing its ability to sustain a singing sound - though it does also set up different overtones and the piano might sound strangely tuned. Also, the action is lighter. On a modern grand the many repeated notes in Schubert could turn into Prokofiev.”
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostI've been looking at these bars, and they do seem incongruous. (...) This is like a cut-and-paste from a different work
Richter plays the first movement far too slowly if you ask me.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostIncongruity of course is not an unSchubertian feature, especially in his later music... the incongruity is quite intentional on Schubert's part...
I couldn’t agree more.
Play the repeat.
(Especially after retirement, when there’s more time, but also before! )
Comment
-
-
[QUOTE=Keraulophone;65137.... Richter (EMI....)[/QUOTE]
Are you sure about that? I didn't know there was a Richter EMI recording for this sonata.
The 1964 Richter version I mentioned is from Aldeburgh, and I see from an online discography that there are versions from 1957 and 1961 also. I wonder if the 1957 is as slow as the later ones?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by silvestrione View PostAre you sure about that? I didn't know there was a Richter EMI recording for this sonata.
Comment
-
-
I realised I also have Paul Lewis's 2004 version of this sonata which came with the Harmonia Mundi 50th anniversary box set a few years ago. I've just listened again and really enjoyed it. The first movement starts quite slowly, building subtly and offering no repeat (Brendel is his mentor). Beautiful slow movement and very attractive recorded sound. An engaging performance with lots of lovely touches but most likely not an overall "winner" (lack of repeat might not help his cause) but certainly worth a mention.
Comment
-
Comment