BaL 16.12.17 - Schubert: Piano Sonata no. 21 in B flat D960

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • silvestrione
    Full Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 1722

    Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
    "Never trust the teller, trust the tale", aktcherly.
    Oops, thank you for correction! It felt slightly wrong as I typed it.

    Comment

    • ferneyhoughgeliebte
      Gone fishin'
      • Sep 2011
      • 30163

      Originally posted by richardfinegold View Post
      Composers were trying to communicate with listeners
      But how can such communication take place if an Interpreter doesn't play what the composer has written?

      not be quality control supervisors at factories.
      In what way(s) does a performer playing what the composers wrote turn those composers into "quality control supervisors at a factory"?

      And then the listener can decide for the self if the performance is valid
      But how can a listener do such a thing if s/he doesn't know that an interpretation has expurgated passages from a work? In short, how can a performance which doesn't present the full text of a work be "valid", without saying that the composers' ideas are "invalid"?
      [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

      Comment

      • french frank
        Administrator/Moderator
        • Feb 2007
        • 30456

        Does anyone have the Michel Dalberto Brilliant set? Well reviewed but I assume D960 is only available as part of the set? Or not at all other than the market stall?
        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

        Comment

        • silvestrione
          Full Member
          • Jan 2011
          • 1722

          Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
          But how can such communication take place if an Interpreter doesn't play what the composer has written?


          In what way(s) does a performer playing what the composers wrote turn those composers into "quality control supervisors at a factory"?


          But how can a listener do such a thing if s/he doesn't know that an interpretation has expurgated passages from a work? In short, how can a performance which doesn't present the full text of a work be "valid", without saying that the composers' ideas are "invalid"?
          Great performances often suggest that some of the composer's ideas are invalid. Cf Rachmaninov (passim), Michelangeli in Schumann and Ravel, Horowitz (usually much less tactfully!), Brendel in Schubert etc. etc.

          Comment

          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
            Gone fishin'
            • Sep 2011
            • 30163

            Originally posted by silvestrione View Post
            Great performances often suggest that some of the composer's ideas are invalid.
            I think that this is is utter bol ... nonsense, if the work in question is - as D960 undoubtedly is - one of the finest products of the human imagination. If it is a "great performance", it will engage fully with the ideas of a "great work". Some other composers do indeed need "help" from performers' "tweaks", but this work ain't one of them.

            Indeed, if what you suggest were true, then the work wouldn't need to be performed at all - all that would be needed is the chosen recording to be played. In forty/fifty years' time Brendel and all the recordings in Alpie's list will be known only to a few enthusiasts: a fraction of the number of people who wish to hear D960. The work is what where the greatest interest lies - the performers are only important inasmuch as how much they communicate of the work.
            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

            Comment

            • silvestrione
              Full Member
              • Jan 2011
              • 1722

              Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
              I think that this is is utter bol ... nonsense, if the work in question is - as D960 undoubtedly is - one of the finest products of the human imagination. If it is a "great performance", it will engage fully with the ideas of a "great work". Some other composers do indeed need "help" from performers' "tweaks", but this work ain't one of them.

              Indeed, if what you suggest were true, then the work wouldn't need to be performed at all - all that would be needed is the chosen recording to be played. In forty/fifty years' time Brendel and all the recordings in Alpie's list will be known only to a few enthusiasts: a fraction of the number of people who wish to hear D960. The work is what where the greatest interest lies - the performers are only important inasmuch as how much they communicate of the work.
              I think it's just common sense. You're going off....on a different tack. It's not so different from a composer/artist showing a work to colleagues he/she trusts and having things (weaknesses or potential weaknesses) pointed out he/she has not realised are there.

              But I'm now two posts past my final thoughts on the matter....That's definitely it.

              Comment

              • jayne lee wilson
                Banned
                • Jul 2011
                • 10711

                Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                "Never trust the teller, trust the tale", aktcherly.
                No, the correct quote is as Silvestrione originally wrote..."Never trust the artist. Trust the tale..."

                Page 1, Chapter 1.....

                Comment

                • silvestrione
                  Full Member
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 1722

                  Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
                  No, the correct quote is as Silvestrione originally wrote..."Never trust the artist. Trust the tale..."

                  Page 1, Chapter 1.....
                  https://biblio.wiki/wiki/Studies_in_...ture/Chapter_1
                  My memory is working better than I realised! The jury is rather out on my reasoning powers....

                  Comment

                  • Richard Barrett
                    Guest
                    • Jan 2016
                    • 6259

                    Originally posted by silvestrione View Post
                    He thinks the art-work itself knows better than Schubert
                    This statement makes no sense to me. How can an artwork "know" anything? Brendel thinks he knows better than Schubert.
                    Originally posted by silvestrione View Post
                    One of the weaknesses of the Schubert sonatas is the element of repetition, that is just repetition, particularly in last movements, but also, as Brendel says, in expositions and recapitulations. So, we don't need it three times, the balance and structure don't, the impact is greater without.
                    And what you're saying here is that you don't really like Schubert's late work, which is of course OK - I find the last movement of his C major symphony tedious in the extreme, and excising the repeats does little to improve it as far as I'm concerned. But on the few occasions that I feel like hearing it I do want to hear the music as written by Schubert and not as chopped up by someone who is unable or unwilling to commit themselves to what's in the score.

                    Comment

                    • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                      Gone fishin'
                      • Sep 2011
                      • 30163

                      Originally posted by silvestrione View Post
                      I think it's just common sense.
                      Oh ... that! Of very limited use at the best of times, and the enemy of any Art worthy of the name.

                      I think you're right that this conversation has reached the same empasse that this subject always does; it'll no doubt recur. The most important thing I personally take from it can be summed up as vive les differences
                      [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                      Comment

                      • silvestrione
                        Full Member
                        • Jan 2011
                        • 1722

                        Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
                        This statement makes no sense to me. How can an artwork "know" anything? Brendel thinks he knows better than Schubert.
                        And what you're saying here is that you don't really like Schubert's late work, which is of course OK - I find the last movement of his C major symphony tedious in the extreme, and excising the repeats does little to improve it as far as I'm concerned. But on the few occasions that I feel like hearing it I do want to hear the music as written by Schubert and not as chopped up by someone who is unable or unwilling to commit themselves to what's in the score.
                        Please don't put words into my mouth: I LOVE Schubert's late works, but surely that doesn't preclude a little discrimination, does it?

                        You give yourself away with 'chopped up': that is clearly NOT what Brendel is doing. Smoothing out perhaps, if you want to put it negatively.

                        'How can an art-work "know" anything?' It's a figure of speech, of course, but an illuminating one I think, and I recommend the original context of the dictum from D.H.Lawrence.

                        Comment

                        • Nick Armstrong
                          Host
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 26572

                          Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                          utter bol
                          Is that like spag bol, just using meatballs instead?
                          "...the isle is full of noises,
                          Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
                          Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
                          Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

                          Comment

                          • waldo
                            Full Member
                            • Mar 2013
                            • 449

                            Originally posted by french frank View Post
                            Does anyone have the Michel Dalberto Brilliant set? Well reviewed but I assume D960 is only available as part of the set? Or not at all other than the market stall?
                            I had it for a while.........but moved it on again. A big red box with just about everything Schubert wrote for solo piano.

                            I'm afraid I don't remember the playing in detail, so I can't offer much of a review. All I remember is that I wasn't that impressed, though there was nothing really objectionable about the playing or the sound. I had no qualms about getting rid of the set, anyway. That probably isn't very helpful..........though I wouldn't dream of getting rid of my Kempff, Lupu, Pollini, Uchida, Andsnes or Schiff.

                            Comment

                            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                              Gone fishin'
                              • Sep 2011
                              • 30163

                              Originally posted by Caliban View Post
                              Is that like spag bol, just using meatballs instead?
                              Yes - or rissoles.
                              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                              Comment

                              • Nick Armstrong
                                Host
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 26572

                                Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                                Yes - or rissoles.
                                "...the isle is full of noises,
                                Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
                                Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
                                Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X