Originally posted by Petrushka
View Post
Bruckner: Symphony no. 3 in D minor BaL 31/12/16
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostA Sinopoli Bruckner full cycle would have been a happy addition to his wonderful Mahler traversal.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostIt would help if searching for "Bruckner Sinopoli" on QOBUZ rendered more than just 3, 4, 5 and 7. To find 8 and 9 you have to search for "Bruckner Dresden".
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View PostWell, in for a penny, in for a Euro. I've just bought the Blomstedt through amazon.de for about £18
Wouldn't previously have picked Tom S to sell me anything, but IMHO the boy dun good on a nigh-impossible task
I then placed an order on amazon.uk at c.£16 + p&p, putting less than total faith in their statement that more stock was anticipated. But they told me yesterday that my order will arrive chez LMP between 18 Jan and 9 Feb
Will let you know if my joy is confounded...I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostIt would help if searching for "Bruckner Sinopoli" on QOBUZ rendered more than just 3, 4, 5 and 7. To find 8 and 9 you have to search for "Bruckner Dresden".
Comment
-
-
With my sketchy knowledge about Bruckner 3, I don't really belong on this interesting and erudite thread, but I think I've read most of it and can't recall the Gielen SWR recording having been mentioned. It's a performance that certainly seems to move along (I remember the opening string motif sounding like a brook rushing down a mountainside) and one I find very enjoyable. Gielen's a conductor who digs out interesting detail I think, there are moments of dissonance, a passage of consecutive 7ths (iirc?) and a really inebriated sounding brass passage, that stick in my mind, the sort of detail that makes the music so surprising and exhilarating at times.
Funny how the sudden stops and starts, and stark changes in B's symphonies, can recall Sibelius in a way, speaking perhaps of a deep uncertainty in both, both often evoking images of nature, but how different!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Daniel View PostWith my sketchy knowledge about Bruckner 3, I don't really belong on this interesting and erudite thread, but I think I've read most of it and can't recall the Gielen SWR recording having been mentioned. It's a performance that certainly seems to move along (I remember the opening string motif sounding like a brook rushing down a mountainside) and one I find very enjoyable. Gielen's a conductor who digs out interesting detail I think, there are moments of dissonance, a passage of consecutive 7ths (iirc?) and a really inebriated sounding brass passage, that stick in my mind, the sort of detail that makes the music so surprising and exhilarating at times.
Funny how the sudden stops and starts, and stark changes in B's symphonies, can recall Sibelius in a way, speaking perhaps of a deep uncertainty in both, both often evoking images of nature, but how different!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Daniel View PostWith my sketchy knowledge about Bruckner 3, I don't really belong on this interesting and erudite thread, but I think I've read most of it and can't recall the Gielen SWR recording having been mentioned. It's a performance that certainly seems to move along (I remember the opening string motif sounding like a brook rushing down a mountainside) and one I find very enjoyable. Gielen's a conductor who digs out interesting detail I think, there are moments of dissonance, a passage of consecutive 7ths (iirc?) and a really inebriated sounding brass passage, that stick in my mind, the sort of detail that makes the music so surprising and exhilarating at times.
Funny how the sudden stops and starts, and stark changes in B's symphonies, can recall Sibelius in a way, speaking perhaps of a deep uncertainty in both, both often evoking images of nature, but how different!
It didn't disappoint! But a landmark recording for me in another way as I realised I'd had enough of the revisions and decided to listen only to 1873 for.... well, as long as it took. But then the 1954 VPO/ Knappertsbusch of 1890 appeared on Testament (2004 - a label I was devoted to then, as to Kna's Bruckner) and I had to briefly break my vows... but it still stands out.
I stuck with 1873 after that - and it worked. It was only with the 1890/Venzago release (2013 c/w 6) that I went back, yet I only really appreciated what he was doing when I revisited it last week - some revelation.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Daniel View PostFunny how the sudden stops and starts, and stark changes in B's symphonies, can recall Sibelius in a way, speaking perhaps of a deep uncertainty in both, both often evoking images of nature, but how different!
On one infamous occasion when Sibelius was a young man studying in Vienna he got into a scuffle at a Bruckner concert with some frightful Brahmsians () and consequently injured his foot which left him with a slight limp. Hopefully that was only a temporary injury. but apparently he later always referred to this incident as his 'Bruckner Foot'.
Not sure about either composer being 'uncertain' in their compositions. The 'stops and starts' are quite deliberate and Bruckner at least is reported to have explained exactly that to others on a number of occasions.
Bruckner's music had a clear influence on early Sibelius as Kullervo and the latter's second symphony amply demonstrate. However, both composers eventually followed their own paths as great composers always do ...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostI’ve often contemplated the Bruckner/Sibelius comparison in the way that you describe.
It only actually occurred to me relatively recently, their difference being sufficient to obscure their connection for me. That and my innate stupidity.
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostOh yes - I recall rushing to order the Gielen after this classic review from Osborne the doyen, which contains several notable comparisons itself (with Haitink, Barenboim etc) all with that effortless, articulate authority.
It didn't disappoint! But a landmark recording for me in another way as I realised I'd had enough of the revisions and decided to listen only to 1873 for.... well, as long as it took. But then the 1954 VPO/ Knappertsbusch of 1890 appeared on Testament (2004 - a label I was devoted to then, as to Kna's Bruckner) and I had to briefly break my vows... but it still stands out.
I stuck with 1873 after that - and it worked. It was only with the 1890/Venzago release (2013 c/w 6) that I went back, yet I only really appreciated what he was doing when I revisited it last week - some revelation.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostI’ve often contemplated the Bruckner/Sibelius comparison in the way that you describe.
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View PostIsn't it maybe more a case of Jean recalling Anton ... ?
Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View PostNot sure about either composer being 'uncertain' in their compositions. The 'stops and starts' are quite deliberate and Bruckner at least is reported to have explained exactly that to others on a number of occasions.
Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View PostOn one infamous occasion when Sibelius was a young man studying in Vienna he got into a scuffle at a Bruckner concert with some frightful Brahmsians () and consequently injured his foot which left him with a slight limp. Hopefully that was only a temporary injury. but apparently he later always referred to this incident as his 'Bruckner Foot'.
Comment
-
Comment