Originally posted by Caliban
View Post
Gramophone's Christian Hoskins (a careful & precise Brucknerian who really knows his editions) was a touch lukewarm about it: 1 - 3 very good, fine 6 and 9, but better in Chicago and Berlin Phil respectively.... 5th disappointing. 7 and 8 lacking tension especially in their codas.... And so on, despite calling it "a significant addition to the Bruckner discography". Editions used are are mixture of Carragan, Haas and Nowak, but Oeser in 3...
I enjoyed the Proms performances and I'm sure these would have a lovely Bruckner sound, but I don't think there'd be much new insight on offer here....
After what I said earlier (#284, 309) about wishing the COE would record Bruckner, I suddenly remembered these -
They had mixed reviews, so time in the Gramophone archive would be well spent. But 3/1889 and 4/1880 received high praise (RO and EG) and having just played 6 (i) I can add to that. It's close to what I was looking for, if a bit larger than the COE - strings (24-9-7-6) sweet and expressive but never drenching the texture, lighter & more transparent but with a good, well-defined bass; winds and brass very clean and foregrounded, sounding out wonderfully in the spacious Salzburg acoustic - which seems ideal for Bruckner. Crisp and up-tempo too. It does rather remind me of that COE Berglund Sibelius.
After my experience of Venzago's 3rd (v.#284) I badly want to return to that cycle, such a revelation when it first appeared - but the Bolton live ones, if less radical interpretatively, seem very inviting too.
So if you want a fresh view, but with at least some of that Austrian orchestral character....
Comment