Originally posted by mikealdren
View Post
BaL 11.02.17 - Bach: Mass in B minor
Collapse
X
-
p.s I should add my agreement with those more knowledgeable than I, that I think the doubling of the oboe part sounds like a bad idea, neutering part of its natural expression. As someone who enjoys Bach on the piano there maybe an element of hypocrisy/inconsistency in that, it's just that breathing is such a fundamental part of wind music, that smoothing it over it seems something like removing 'difficult' consonants from Schubert Lieder. In this case anyway it seems that the phrasing is not Bach's.
And while I remember, I agree with you, ferney, about the Dunedin Consort recording (see below), which I have. It always felt slightly airless and I rarely listen to it now, and I think it's probably down to the close mic-ing.
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostI found the voices sounded very close-miked when I heard excerpts from it when it came out - which is cheating for a OVPP recording! And totally unnecessary. It put me off buying it.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Daniel View Postp.s I should add my agreement with those more knowledgeable than I, that I think the doubling of the oboe part sounds like a bad idea, neutering part of its natural expression.
In this case anyway it seems that the phrasing is not Bach's.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostThe doubling in the Karajan recording did not involve in two players playing at once - it was like a relay, with one player taking over from the other.
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostA practical solution without any inherent musical drawbacks.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostI once saw Holliger doing circular breathing in a recital. It looked grotesque!
Well, I picked up the Mortensen recording and I've listened to it twice, only on headphones I should add. I find it very hard to believe that the engineers haven't "helped" the balance between voices and instruments (and between instruments) here and there. Apart from that, everything is in its right and proper place but to me seems a little too clinical and uninvolving as a performance. So I think the field is still wide open for a OoTVPP recording of this work.
Comment
-
-
Staying with the flute(s), the extract played on BaL was the Domine Deus. When Bach revived this movement, about 10 years later (for the Christmas Day Gloria in excelsis Deo, BWV191, he labelled the score '2 flauti trav all' unis' and in nearly all the HIP recordings that I've heard (and in all the performances I've played in), that's how it's done. So, although I agree that (my understanding of ) Bach's aesthetic certainly doesn't demand the sort of unbroken legato that Karajan was seeking, it certainly is possible (and is customary) for the 2 players to stagger the breaths (while also trying their best to keep those unison high F#s in tune...).
The other flute obbligato, the Benedictus, is genuinely solo - so the flautist does need to break the line in places (and it was interesting, listening to Katy Bircher on the Mortensen recording, to hear a few options that I hadn't previously tried).
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostSo I think the field is still wide open for a OoTVPP recording of this work.
Hopelessly out of my depth in this metaphor![FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ostuni View PostStaying with the flute(s), the extract played on BaL was the Domine Deus. When Bach revived this movement, about 10 years later (for the Christmas Day Gloria in excelsis Deo, BWV191, he labelled the score '2 flauti trav all' unis' and in nearly all the HIP recordings that I've heard (and in all the performances I've played in), that's how it's done. So, although I agree that (my understanding of ) Bach's aesthetic certainly doesn't demand the sort of unbroken legato that Karajan was seeking, it certainly is possible (and is customary) for the 2 players to stagger the breaths (while also trying their best to keep those unison high F#s in tune...).
See! I said Karajan sounded more "authentic" than Richter.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostOoh - bravo, ostuni!
See! I said Karajan sounded more "authentic" than Richter.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostIt still doesn't satisfy those who argue that "Bach expected the poor players to gasp for breath, so the embarrassing gaps are an essential part of the performance".
Comment
-
Comment