BaL 21.01.17 - Beethoven: String Quartet no. 12 in E flat, Op. 127

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bryn
    Banned
    • Mar 2007
    • 24688

    #16
    Originally posted by ahinton View Post
    Beef Oven!'s great and he's an expert on Bruckner!

    Beethoven's also great, as you rightly note, although Mr Johnson will have only different versions of recordings of Op. 127 to survey rather than of the score itself; not only that, even those will not include a reloading by Peter Maxwell Marthé!
    Lest we forget:

    Comment

    • LeMartinPecheur
      Full Member
      • Apr 2007
      • 4717

      #17
      I have a feeling that Op127 is the Cinderella of the late quartets. Why? Possibly because 130, 131 and 132 are clearly 'complete 2nd half' works in a concert, but 127 is a bit too short to take that spot on its own. It could I suppose be part or all of a 1st half, but that somehow seems disrespectful! Anyway, after 40+ years of concert-going I caught it live for the very first time only in 2014. (Yes, I confess, I've yet to tackle a complete cycle)

      On disc I too stated with the Hungarians' HMV bargain-box c1973 for 127. Since then, the Italians, the Takacs and the Lindsays have been added (complete sets of just the late quartets for the Is and the Ts). The Lindsay perdormance came as a gift in this 'Resonance' box set but there are no recording dates that I can see. Are they the same recordings as appeared on HMV-shop twofers with ASV 'P' dates of 1987?
      I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!

      Comment

      • ahinton
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 16122

        #18
        Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View Post
        I have a feeling that Op127 is the Cinderella of the late quartets.
        Absolutely NOT for me it isn't!

        Comment

        • LeMartinPecheur
          Full Member
          • Apr 2007
          • 4717

          #19
          Originally posted by ahinton View Post
          Absolutely NOT for me it isn't!
          OK, "the Cinderella in concert programming" then.
          I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!

          Comment

          • MickyD
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 4750

            #20
            As far as I know, we are still waiting for a period performance of the late Beethoven quartets.

            Comment

            • Richard Barrett
              Guest
              • Jan 2016
              • 6259

              #21
              Originally posted by MickyD View Post
              As far as I know, we are still waiting for a period performance of the late Beethoven quartets.
              Of all of them, to be sure, but there are a few which have cropped up in mixed Beethoven quartet discs over the years, and indeed my first recording of op.132 was made by the quartet of the Collegium Aureum in the mid-70s. It's still worth hearing I think.

              Comment

              • BBMmk2
                Late Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 20908

                #22
                I know this work well but haven't any recordings of it. I do rather like The Hagen and the Tackacs Quartets, though. So maybe look this one up for starters.
                Don’t cry for me
                I go where music was born

                J S Bach 1685-1750

                Comment

                • visualnickmos
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 3609

                  #23
                  Looking forward to this BaL. I have just two sets of LvB's SQs, Alban Berg Quartet (EMI) and the Juilliard Quartet (Sony rec'd. 1964-1970)

                  I have not totally familiarised myself with them in detail, but I enjoy both. I don't feel the desire to add.

                  Comment

                  • richardfinegold
                    Full Member
                    • Sep 2012
                    • 7657

                    #24
                    In addition to the Hungarians and the Italians, I have the Yale, Cleveland, Tokyo and Guarneri sets. The last two are bargain basement CD issues in good sound and really they all are excellent. I also have The Auryn Qt on DVD Audio which places the listener in the middle of the Quartet

                    Comment

                    • verismissimo
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 2957

                      #25
                      Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View Post
                      ... the Lindsays have been added (complete sets of just the late quartets for the Is and the Ts). The Lindsay perdormance came as a gift in this 'Resonance' box set but there are no recording dates that I can see. Are they the same recordings as appeared on HMV-shop twofers with ASV 'P' dates of 1987?
                      The usually reliable Presto states that this is the Lindsays first recorded cycle. I generally prefer it to their later one.

                      (Pedants corner: When they recorded it, they were the Lindsay String Quartet. By the time they recorded it again, they were Lindsays.)

                      Comment

                      • verismissimo
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 2957

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Beef Oven! View Post
                        Beethoven’s great, but he’s no Bruckner.
                        Love those Bruckie string quartets, Beefie. And his trios, piano, violin and cello sonatas, songs, operas. Oh and as for his septet ...

                        Comment

                        • Eine Alpensinfonie
                          Host
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 20570

                          #27
                          Originally posted by verismissimo View Post
                          (Pedants corner: When they recorded it, they were the Lindsay String Quartet. By the time they recorded it again, they were Lindsays.)
                          A bit of an inappropriate name anyway. They named themselves as a string quartet (which they were) in honour of Lord Lindsay, founder of Keele University, where the quartet was in residence for 14 years. Then they moved on to Sheffield and Manchester, calling themselves "The Lindsays" (which they never were) until they disbanded. Ironically, Peter Cropper was the only player to last out the full 39 years of the quartet, so it might have been more apt to have stuck with their original name - the Cropper Quartet.

                          Comment

                          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                            Gone fishin'
                            • Sep 2011
                            • 30163

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                            A bit of an inappropriate name anyway. They named themselves as a string quartet (which they were) in honour of Lord Lindsay, founder of Keele University, where the quartet was in residence for 14 years. Then they moved on to Sheffield and Manchester, calling themselves "The Lindsays" (which they never were) until they disbanded. Ironically, Peter Cropper was the only player to last out the full 39 years of the quartet, so it might have been more apt to have stuck with their original name - the Cropper Quartet.
                            By the same token, was the Amadeus S4tet also not "inappropriately name[d]", or the Aeolians, or the Alban Bergs, or the Diotimas, or the Fitzwilliams? An ensemble can call itself whatever it wishes, can it not ... the Lindsays, the Shirleys, the Beverleys, the Kimberleys ... entirely up to them? If they chose to honour somebody who founded a University, in what sense is it "inappropriate"?
                            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                            Comment

                            • ahinton
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 16122

                              #29
                              Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                              By the same token, was the Amadeus S4tet also not "inappropriately name[d]", or the Aeolians, or the Alban Bergs, or the Diotimas, or the Fitzwilliams? An ensemble can call itself whatever it wishes, can it not ... the Lindsays, the Shirleys, the Beverleys, the Kimberleys ... entirely up to them? If they chose to honour somebody who founded a University, in what sense is it "inappropriate"?
                              Quite. The Smiths, anyone? Or the Jacks?

                              Comment

                              • verismissimo
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 2957

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                                ... Ironically, Peter Cropper was the only player to last out the full 39 years of the quartet ...
                                I thought Bernard Gregor-Smith was also an original, Alpie. No?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X