BaL 14.01.17 - Tchaikovsky: Symphony no. 4 in F minor

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Beef Oven!
    Ex-member
    • Sep 2013
    • 18147

    Originally posted by visualnickmos View Post
    It's not only me, then! I seem to do it nearly everytime.... provided it's a BaL that I'm interested in, in the first place, that is... and quite a few fall into this category, so I can pop to the shops instead!
    Yes, it must be something of interest in the first place. About 30% of them in my case, I’d say. But they’re all quite fun in their own way.

    Comment

    • ferneyhoughgeliebte
      Gone fishin'
      • Sep 2011
      • 30163

      Originally posted by visualnickmos View Post
      It's not only me, then! I seem to do it nearly everytime.... provided it's a BaL that I'm interested in, in the first place, that is... and quite a few fall into this category, so I can pop to the shops instead!
      Originally posted by Beef Oven! View Post
      Yes, it must be something of interest in the first place. About 30% of them in my case, I’d say. But they’re all quite fun in their own way.
      [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

      Comment

      • Barbirollians
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 11882

        Just played the Abbado - forgotten how good it was - surprised indeed it was overlooked .

        Comment

        • Pianoman
          Full Member
          • Jan 2013
          • 529

          Originally posted by Tony View Post
          Hmmm... because of his training as a viol player and his grounding in 'baroque style' he is treating bars 3 and 4 each as a self-contained 'cell' that doesn't use the last note of each bar (F) as upbeats that join those bars together over the barlines. This is a way, a somewhat wilful one, of standing 'tradition' on its head by simply playing a very well-known work 'differently'... 'shock/horror'
          Yep, I think you're right that's what he's doing...Well, on repeated listening it could (would) become b****y annoying...I'll stick to the two Ms - Mravinsky and Maazel (VPO) with a dash of Ashkenazy's rather fine Kingsway Hall jobbie..)

          Comment

          • Tony Halstead
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 1717

            Originally posted by Pianoman View Post
            Yep, I think you're right that's what he's doing...Well, on repeated listening it could (would) become b****y annoying...I'll stick to the two Ms - Mravinsky and Maazel (VPO) with a dash of Ashkenazy's rather fine Kingsway Hall jobbie..)
            I am quite 'gutted' that RC didn't mention the incandescent Barbirolli / Hallé recording... 'Mercury' recording team, Manchester 'Free Trade Hall' ( wonderful acoustic...much better than the Bridgwater Hall)
            Last edited by Tony Halstead; 15-01-17, 12:15. Reason: tautology

            Comment

            • pastoralguy
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 7870

              I had a cassette tape of Barbirolli and the Halle playing Tchaikovsky 4 that was on EMI. The string portamenti in the first movement is really OTT but, by goodness, it's well played. Iirc, there was a rehearsal segment with Barbirolli shouting 'even if you can't play all the notes just play SOMETHING - MAKE A NOISE!!!!'

              Fantastic!

              Comment

              • Barbirollians
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 11882

                Originally posted by pastoralguy View Post
                I had a cassette tape of Barbirolli and the Halle playing Tchaikovsky 4 that was on EMI. The string portamenti in the first movement is really OTT but, by goodness, it's well played. Iirc, there was a rehearsal segment with Barbirolli shouting 'even if you can't play all the notes just play SOMETHING - MAKE A NOISE!!!!'

                Fantastic!
                On the famous Monitor programme with Barbirolli he is conducting the RNCM orchestra in Tchaikovsky 4 and how he inspires them to play out of their skins .

                Comment

                • BBMmk2
                  Late Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 20908

                  Originally posted by Beef Oven! View Post
                  Quite often with BaLs, I’m captured by something other than the winner and will often buy that instead. Of course the whole business is entirely subjective - but quite a lot of fun!
                  Quiter agree, Beefy! I have formed what kind of interpretation I like from this work, as with others we know, and from experience, my favourites are: Mravinsky, Jansons, HvK(Ist one) Jurowski - LPO, and Litton, oh Lenny too! :)
                  Don’t cry for me
                  I go where music was born

                  J S Bach 1685-1750

                  Comment

                  • visualnickmos
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 3617

                    One of Karajan's was favourably mentioned; is it by chance this one? I somehow think not, but I'm unclear......



                    I couldn't find an earlier (early 1960s) version....

                    PS I recently played Ashkenazy's set of 3-6. Really quite stunning recordings and performances.
                    Last edited by visualnickmos; 15-01-17, 09:34. Reason: a PS and a wrong link! Too early...

                    Comment

                    • Petrushka
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 12389

                      Originally posted by visualnickmos View Post
                      One of Karajan's was favourably mentioned; is it by chance this one? I somehow think not, but I'm unclear......



                      I couldn't find an earlier (early 1960s) version.....
                      Karajan recorded the 4th in 1953 with the Philharmonia and again, in stereo, with the BPO in 1960. Both recordings are included in this box:

                      "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink

                      Comment

                      • kernelbogey
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 5841

                        Originally posted by Petrushka View Post
                        Karajan recorded the 4th in 1953 with the Philharmonia and again, in stereo, with the BPO in 1960. Both recordings are included in this box:

                        https://www.amazon.co.uk/Mussorgsky-...jan+remastered
                        I'm pretty sure Rob favoured the 1960.

                        Comment

                        • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                          Gone fishin'
                          • Sep 2011
                          • 30163

                          IIRC, the Karajan recording chosen by RC was the 1966 DG version:



                          ... also available in the big DG "Karajan: the 60s" box.
                          [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                          Comment

                          • BBMmk2
                            Late Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 20908

                            Yes, most certainly the 1960. :)
                            Don’t cry for me
                            I go where music was born

                            J S Bach 1685-1750

                            Comment

                            • kernelbogey
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 5841

                              Listening to Fischer now... Very fine, IMO!

                              I notice a fairly short break between III & IV - and recall some conductors start IV with barely a beat between. Is this in the score? Or a matter of interpretation? If the latter then it's an expression of the opinion that the fundamental 'story' of the piece is pessimistic: never mind folk songs, passing bands and a glass of wine, life is fate...! (My interpretation, too, on first hearing it live, aged 16!)

                              Comment

                              • Petrushka
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 12389

                                Originally posted by kernelbogey View Post
                                I'm pretty sure Rob favoured the 1960.
                                Karajan then recorded the symphony again for DG with the BPO in 1966 and 1977 and for EMI in 1971. His final recording of the 4th was with the VPO for DG in 1985.

                                I have all of them....
                                "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X