Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie
View Post
BaL 31.12.16 - Bruckner: Symphony no. 3 in D minor
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View PostI can't understand why he chose the Blomstedt, despite his reasoning!!! ... But he did give a good lucid argument for his case.
It was very obvious (unless TS was going to do an Agatha Christie, and recommend a completely unexpected recording, like the Ballot) who was going to "win" - every time Blomstedt was mentioned, the tone of his voice lifted into reverential awe. From the excerpts (I shall be delighted to listen to the whole work tomorrow morning) it sounded to me that, whilst there were particularly impressive points of detail, there were also crucial features that were lost: the very opening demonstrated this - the ostinato accompaniment was superb (a real sense not just of "mystery" - most performances get that - but of menace, which really grabbed and held my attention) but the solo trumpet theme was barely audible. At current prices, I shan't be investing.
But I'm certainly going to buy the LPO/Skrowaczewski (blimey! I spelt that correctly before looking it up!) with its awareness of the rubato conventions of the late 19th Century that Bruckner might well have taken for granted (and so not written into the score[s])but of which TS seemed unaware; a most uncharacteristic lapse of scholarship from him. But on the whole I enjoyed listening to the review; agreeing with him when he got things right, and disagreeing when he didn't.
By the way - does anyone else find themselves listening to BaLs these days with a "subtext" running through their minds on the lines of "Ooh! Cali ain't gonna like that!" or "Barbi's going to need an extra Remipril now"?Last edited by ferneyhoughgeliebte; 31-12-16, 12:28.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Il Grande Inquisitor View PostIt's sloppy. Surely the purpose of BaL is to choose a recording which is currently available? And no, reviewers aren't allowed to consider a recording as "available" if it's on sale from an Amazon marketplace seller.
I know they changed the rules so nla records could be considered but I always understood that was so the reviewer could say I would have chosen X but it is nla .
I was less impressed than others with this BAL . Not only the Tintner dismissal - a recording that has been very well reviewed in the past but also the failure to deal with older recordings very common on BAL now .
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by hafod View PostThe Blomstedt is stated to be an SACD and 'requires SACD compatible hardware' which (correct me if I am wrong) means it won't play on a non SACD player.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View PostPhew! Hafod worried me even though amazon.de had said it was compatible."Let me have my own way in exactly everything, and a sunnier and more pleasant creature does not exist." Thomas Carlyle
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Il Grande Inquisitor View PostIt's sloppy. Surely the purpose of BaL is to choose a recording which is currently available? And no, reviewers aren't allowed to consider a recording as "available" if it's on sale from an Amazon marketplace seller.
Comment
-
-
What did the more knowledgeable Brucknerians here make of TS's concluding thesis that AB's (and later editors') continuing attempts to make this work, particularly the finale, coherent were doomed because the very essence of it is the incoherence/ incompatability of the thematic material? So better accept and embrace this than attempt a self-defeating synthesis.
[Probably I summarize too crudely... ]Last edited by LeMartinPecheur; 31-12-16, 14:36. Reason: fhg's rewrite of my original word 'expert' in #220 ;-)I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View PostWhat did fellow Forumistas make of TS's concluding thesis that AB's (and later editors') continuing attempts to make this work, particularly the finale, coherent were doomed because the very essence of it is the incoherence/ incompatability of the thematic material? So better accept and embrace this than attempt a self-defeating synthesis.
[Probably I summarize too crudely... ]
With an apology for altering your text, LMP - we've had enough of experts, after all[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by soileduk View PostThey are hybrid SACD Hafod so will play. I bit the bullet for the Blomstedt box last week. Bloody expensive and I'm still not sure if I should have.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sir Velo View PostNot sure I agree. Recordings so frequently come and go out of the catalogue that it doesn't make sense to exclude something which may only be temporarily unavailable. Moreover, any record company worth its salt, will reinstate a recording which has the BAL imprimatur.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostTo put it in context I ordered the complete Phillips Brendel recordings--over 100 CDs- for the same cost as this Bruckner set
While my wallet gently weeps...........
Comment
-
Comment