Originally posted by Caliban
View Post
BaL 24.12.16/10.12.22 - Mozart: Piano Concerto no. 21 in C, K467
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostDo you mean that you went and have only just realised/found out that you heard something other than you thought?
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostI rest my case .[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostWhich one, Barbs? The "Bilson is prosaic although I haven't heard this recording" or the "DON makes bizarre choices"? In both instances, I think on this occasion the Judge dismisses the charges for lack of evidence.
I thought that the Bilson was indeed prosaic and I could not understand his preference for his tinkly piano to that played by Brautigam which sounded much more interesting .
It was obvious after his Op 111 review that he would choose a fortepiano recording but this sounded just dull .
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostWhich one, Barbs? The "Bilson is prosaic although I haven't heard this recording" or the "DON makes bizarre choices"? In both instances, I think on this occasion the Judge dismisses the charges for lack of evidence.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostA self appointed judge .
I thought that the Bilson was indeed prosaic and I could not understand his preference for his tinkly piano to that played by Brautigam which sounded much more interesting .
We're all "self-appointed judges" in our response to the reviewers, and I find DON's presentation style when left on his own (he's much better housetrained when in conversation with others) eternally annoying. But sifting the substance from the manner, I thought his demonstration of (and comments on) recordings by Schnabel, Perahia, Brendel, Barenboim (!), and the Busoni cadenza - as well as his final choice - well argued and judged.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by verismissimo View PostThis is a regular issue on these boards, ferney. Not only did the reviewer not check in here as to what might be acceptable, but he actually chose a recording not heard here but cordially disliked. Disgraceful. Something must be done.
Well - getting into a Christmas spirit - the Forum is a chatroom, and Forumistas' contributions (particularly on the BaL Threads) are to be taken in the spirit of a chat/argument amongst friends, rather than erudite scholarly lectures. I enjoy Barb's reactions to the BaL (based, as they are, on real love of the Music) and enjoyed even more disagreeing with them![FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View PostI have 11 commercial recordings (all of them listed in #1) plus the BBC MM Curzon/BBCSO/Klee, so it ought to be a cheap Saturday But no promises
One slight mystery though. My trusty card index also tells me I have 9 x 20, 13 x 23, 14 x 24, 7 x 25, 10 x 27 but only 3 of 22. (And of 26, but that's more explicable.)
I think 22 is a really fine concerto, fully comparable to all the other properly finished late ones, and was amazed (horrified) to find so few versions of it on my shelves. Does it get fewer recordings for some reason? Or is it so well loved that people hang on to their discs so that they don't turn up in charity shops - my main source of random CD purchases - as often as the others?
FWIW, I thoroughly enjoyed the programme and was very pleased he found time to comment on, and not to dismiss, Annie Fischer's Busoni cadenza. That was my very first LP of WAM piano concertos (now repurchased on CD via the big AF Icon box). Coupled with 22 on the Concert Classics LP, so a big reason why I particularly love that work too - see earlier post re under-representation of K482 above.I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Alison View PostVery good question. Perhaps we don't accord greatness to anything in E flat major.
Isn't the Eroica in Eb? - I think some people think this is a great work...Last edited by LeMartinPecheur; 24-12-16, 20:11. Reason: [bracketed omission] rectified to improve sense, I hopeI keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View PostAlison: is the thing about string players not liking flat keys because of loss of open strings and hence increased difficulty with tuning? Or is there some special reason for hating Eb?? I guess 3 flats was about as far flat-wards as classical composers generally went with strings(?).
Isn't the Eroica in Eb? - I think some people think this is a great work...
Comment
-
Comment