BaL 12.11.16 - Vaughan Williams: A London Symphony

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Barbirollians
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 11900

    Originally posted by EdgeleyRob View Post


    Sea over LvB 9 every day of the week.
    Loadsa tingle factors for me Pulcie,starting with the opening fanfare.
    To each their own I suppose but I suspect yours is a minority view ! outside of Beethoven 9 and Mahler 2 and 3 I am not a fan of choral symphonies .

    Comment

    • EdgeleyRob
      Guest
      • Nov 2010
      • 12180

      Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
      To each their own I suppose but I suspect yours is a minority view ! outside of Beethoven 9 and Mahler 2 and 3 I am not a fan of choral symphonies .
      More than likely

      Comment

      • Pabmusic
        Full Member
        • May 2011
        • 5537

        Well…

        I thought I’d list my versions of the RVW London Symphony. I was shocked. The only (yes, only) obvious omissions are the Norrington and Rosdhesvensky. Two Boults, Barbirollis, Previns and Handleys, and single versions by Godfrey, Wood, Goossens, Arwel Hughes, Haitink, Thomson, Hickox, Slatkin, Baakels, Elder, Yates, Manze. That’s 20 versions.

        Must go to the post office because my new anorak’s just arrived.

        Comment

        • BBMmk2
          Late Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 20908

          Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post
          Well…

          I thought I’d list my versions of the RVW London Symphony. I was shocked. The only (yes, only) obvious omissions are the Norrington and Rosdhesvensky. Two Boults, Barbirollis, Previns and Handleys, and single versions by Godfrey, Wood, Goossens, Arwel Hughes, Haitink, Thomson, Hickox, Slatkin, Baakels, Elder, Yates, Manze. That’s 20 versions.

          Must go to the post office because my new anorak’s just arrived.
          I thought I' was bad enough!
          Don’t cry for me
          I go where music was born

          J S Bach 1685-1750

          Comment

          • Eine Alpensinfonie
            Host
            • Nov 2010
            • 20582

            Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post
            Well…

            I thought I’d list my versions of the RVW London Symphony. I was shocked. The only (yes, only) obvious omissions are the Norrington and Rosdhesvensky. Two Boults, Barbirollis, Previns and Handleys, and single versions by Godfrey, Wood, Goossens, Arwel Hughes, Haitink, Thomson, Hickox, Slatkin, Baakels, Elder, Yates, Manze. That’s 20 versions.

            Must go to the post office because my new anorak’s just arrived.
            You know it really is silly buying multiple recordings of the same work. You know you'll never have time to listen to most of them more than once.

            I've just ordered 3 more Sea Symphonies.

            Comment

            • Pabmusic
              Full Member
              • May 2011
              • 5537

              Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
              You know it really is silly buying multiple recordings of the same work. You know you'll never have time to listen to most of them more than once.
              A
              I've just ordered 3 more Sea Symphonies.

              Pot. Kettle.

              Comment

              • akiralx
                Full Member
                • Oct 2011
                • 431

                One of the things that puts me off the Boult stereo recording is how much he shaves off the sublime Lento, down from 11'02 in 1952 to 9'35. I wonder why? His rather quick interpretation of the slow movement in Elgar's First also rather puts me off that.

                I did just listen to the Beulah release of Boult's excellent mono recording - it does sound rather better than the release I have...

                Comment

                Working...
                X