BaL 12.11.16 - Vaughan Williams: A London Symphony

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Petrushka
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 12395

    #91
    Originally posted by Tony View Post
    May I chip in here, please?
    My 'favourite' order is: 5, 3, 2, 6, 4, 9, 8, 7, 1.
    Been playing a bit of RVW lately but my ranking never changes much, if at all.

    6, 7, 9, 3, 5, 4, 8, 2, 1.

    The problem with buying complete sets is that one gets yet another Sea Symphony that one doesn't want and in all likelihood will never get played.
    "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink

    Comment

    • ardcarp
      Late member
      • Nov 2010
      • 11102

      #92
      Easy to praise a BaL which tallies with one's own prejudices
      I take your point....but disagree! There is a classic way of doing BAL which includes playing contrasting extracts of a reasonable percentage of what is available and giving cogent reasons for making a final choice. This was it today. As far as RVW's London is concerned, I'm agnostic about the versions and would be happy with any of the front runners, tho' would quite like to hear Hickox's 'complete' account. But my shopping cart for Stocking Fillers is already full to busting.

      Comment

      • BBMmk2
        Late Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 20908

        #93
        Ah the Hickox "original version", of The London, is sublime!
        Don’t cry for me
        I go where music was born

        J S Bach 1685-1750

        Comment

        • HighlandDougie
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 3140

          #94
          Originally posted by ardcarp View Post
          I take your point....but disagree! There is a classic way of doing BAL which includes playing contrasting extracts of a reasonable percentage of what is available and giving cogent reasons for making a final choice. This was it today. As far as RVW's London is concerned, I'm agnostic about the versions and would be happy with any of the front runners, tho' would quite like to hear Hickox's 'complete' account. But my shopping cart for Stocking Fillers is already full to busting.
          Absolutely agree that this was, as is neatly, put, "it", in terms of how to do a BaL. Even if, as Beefy said earlier, he had chosen versions not to one's taste, it would be very hard to fault what was in most ways an exemplary programme. My sloppy wording - self-administered slap on the wrist and back to listening to Tod Handley.

          Comment

          • PJPJ
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 1461

            #95
            Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View Post
            Ah the Hickox "original version", of The London, is sublime!
            I agree. A lovely production all round.

            Although I listened with what I thought were both ears this morning, I missed any reference to Manze's new recording. Was it mentioned?

            Comment

            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
              Gone fishin'
              • Sep 2011
              • 30163

              #96
              Originally posted by Petrushka View Post
              The problem with buying complete sets is that one gets yet another Sea Symphony that one doesn't want and in all likelihood will never get played.
              Oh, I always play them - sometimes two or three times each - always in hope; always disappointed.
              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

              Comment

              • Bryn
                Banned
                • Mar 2007
                • 24688

                #97
                Was any mention made of the 1920 revision (Yates)?

                Comment

                • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                  Gone fishin'
                  • Sep 2011
                  • 30163

                  #98
                  Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                  Was any mention made of the 1920 revision (Yates)?
                  Yes - for all the importance of the recording/edition, he didn't think very much of the performance and dismissed it with little regret.
                  [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                  Comment

                  • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                    Gone fishin'
                    • Sep 2011
                    • 30163

                    #99
                    Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                    ... interesting that the second Boult ... which RVW authority Michael Kennedy so admired thirty-odd years ago was quickly left out of the running. I shall be interested to hear his reasons.
                    Ah! Less "grip on the structure" than the Mono recording, and some "moments of flawed ensemble".
                    [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                    Comment

                    • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                      Gone fishin'
                      • Sep 2011
                      • 30163

                      Originally posted by PJPJ View Post
                      Although I listened with what I thought were both ears this morning, I missed any reference to Manze's new recording. Was it mentioned?
                      Yes - on the i-Player, at around 59mins from the start of the programme (not the start of the review) focussed on the Scherzo.

                      Summary: "Manze knows his RVW ... fresh & thoughtful ... I like the tempo there ... buoyancy to the rhythm ... the whole performance seems to get better and better as it goes on; the last movement is terrific ... but the overall symphonic structure doesn't come across as well as it does with the very best. Well worth hearing, though."
                      [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                      Comment

                      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                        Gone fishin'
                        • Sep 2011
                        • 30163

                        What I cannot find any reference to at all is the Hallé/Elder recording ... have I missed it, or did Mr Lowther?
                        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                        Comment

                        • Eine Alpensinfonie
                          Host
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 20582

                          Originally posted by MickyD View Post
                          He he, me neither - I got the CFP Handley box some time ago, and very good it is, too.
                          It's also in the EMI 30 CD Vaughan Williams box set.

                          Comment

                          • Bryn
                            Banned
                            • Mar 2007
                            • 24688

                            Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                            Yes - for all the importance of the recording/edition, he didn't think very much of the performance and dismissed it with little regret.
                            Fairy Nuffield. Can't say I disagree. Perhaps someone with a greater grasp on RVW's muse will have a go at it at some point.

                            Comment

                            • LeMartinPecheur
                              Full Member
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 4717

                              Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                              What I cannot find any reference to at all is the Hallé/Elder recording ... have I missed it, or did Mr Lowther?
                              He gave it a sentence or two mid-review. My notes(!) indicate that he felt it was too calculated, with too many little nudges that might come to annoy.
                              I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!

                              Comment

                              • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                                Gone fishin'
                                • Sep 2011
                                • 30163

                                Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View Post
                                He gave it a sentence or two mid-review. My notes(!) indicate that he felt it was too calculated, with too many little nudges that might come to annoy.
                                Thanks, LMP. There was so much information and food for thought in the programme, I <ahem> must have been contemplating and ruminating upon the points he'd just raised before mentioning this.
                                [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X