Originally posted by Barbirollians
View Post
BaL 24.09.16 - Chopin: Piano Concerto no. 1 in E minor
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Thropplenoggin View PostSMP's commentary seemed rather vapid and wishy-washy to me. Terms like 'vital' playing, 'liquid' playing aren't particularly instructive.
not that she is especially guilty of this, but it particularly irks me.
and who needs irking on a saturday morning?I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Richard Tarleton
Originally posted by Thropplenoggin View PostSMP's commentary seemed rather vapid and wishy-washy to me. Terms like 'vital' playing, 'liquid' playing aren't particularly instructive.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View PostI thought this work called for the forensic approach of a proper pianist - a David Owen Norris, or a Kenneth Hamilton (I always like to learn something from BAL, not just listen to opinions).....but, whoever, we would have got through a lot more without AMcG, I really don't like these 2-hander BALs.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by silvestrione View PostI agree with those who thought this one worked...and I did learn something, e.g. I'll hear more now in the orchestration than ever before, and I learnt about the Polish dance rhythms in the finale.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sir Velo View PostIsn't most of Chopin's music influenced by the different types of Polish dances? Just flicking through a couple of CD liner notes and they all refer to the Krakowiak or modified Polonaise, so I'm not sure how much original research went into that observation.
I say again, that for me, it was a two-hander BaL that worked well.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by visualnickmos View PostI think the point the reviewer was makng, was detailing more precisely how the krakowiak was an influence in that particular movement. Therefore for anyone who wasn't knowledgeable about the influences of dance in Chopin's work, this is a highly relevant point, IMV, as it was followed by clear examples of 'how to' and 'how not to', thus giving substance as to the 'hows' and 'how nots' argument.
I say again, that for me, it was a two-hander BaL that worked well.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostBut why not SM-P (especially SM-P minus AMcG)?
I think the point being made is that SW is a pianist, whereas SM-P practical musical background is principally as a singer and occasional player of the cello. That said, I thought SM-P spoke with a fair degree of authority re. pianistic technique.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostI think the point being made is that SW is a pianist,
whereas SM-P practical musical background is principally as a singer and occasional player of the cello.
That said, I thought SM-P spoke with a fair degree of authority re. pianistic technique.
(* - this did happen in t'olden days when Bernard Keefe reviewed orchestral works.)[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostBut why not SM-P (especially SM-P minus AMcG)?
I think S. M-P has a very good voice and speaking manner for the radio, which may not be the most important quality for a BaL reviewer but it adds a lot.
Comment
-
-
Richard Tarleton
Originally posted by ardcarp View Post"I thought this work called for the forensic approach of a proper pianist - a David Owen Norris, or a Kenneth Hamilton (I always like to learn something from BAL, not just listen to opinions)"
Agreed. But if we must have a R3 staff member, then why not Sarah Walker?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostI would agree that it was far from the worst of the twofer reviews I have heard but worked well I would not have said when it leads to so many recordings that have received high praise elsewhere being ignored . If you have Andrew McGregor chipping in all the time it significantly reduces the time for analysis of recordings and excerpts . Also one finds inexplicable omissions hence why discuss Zimerman's live recording and the self directed accounts but not the Giulini recording which was a prime recommendation in the past ?
Comment
-
Comment