BaL 4.06.16 - Tchaikovsky: Symphony no. 6 in B minor, Op. 74, ‘Pathétique’
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostHaving worked my way through all these CDs in the last 72 hours
Pity the poor reviewer therefore. Mind, I'm sure the majority require little more than a refresher. But then, if she hasn't listened to all of them how can she give a proper verdict?"The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostThere is absolutely no way that I could subject myself to that kind of intense exposure to any piece of music let alone to the Pathetique of all things.
Pity the poor reviewer therefore. Mind, I'm sure the majority require little more than a refresher. But then, if she hasn't listened to all of them how can she give a proper verdict?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cincinnatus View PostShe's not expected to listen to them all, Petrushka. A couple of years ago I e-mailed CD Review(as was) because there had been 3 BALs quite close together where we had been told the number of recordings the reviewers had listened to and it was only a fraction of the number on EA's list. The editorial team told me that when there are a very large number of available recordings the reviewer is only expected to consider a significant proportion of them.
Comment
-
-
I'm not even sure that reviewers listen to the whole performance in its entirety. A little bird once told me that reviewers, faced with a huge number of recordings, start out with a catalogue of points they wish to examine and simply listen to that 'bit' to see if it measures up. It must save time as well as sanity!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by silvestrione View PostThe bars are missing from the Tchaikovsky, aren't they?Last edited by HighlandDougie; 03-06-16, 13:17.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cincinnatus View PostShe's not expected to listen to them all, Petrushka. A couple of years ago I e-mailed CD Review(as was) because there had been 3 BALs quite close together where we had been told the number of recordings the reviewers had listened to and it was only a fraction of the number on EA's list. The editorial team told me that when there are a very large number of available recordings the reviewer is only expected to consider a significant proportion of them.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by zola View PostIt seems that Marina Frolova-Walker did listen to at least part of all available recordings as detailed here from the Record review website.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/arti...the-pathetique
Comment
-
-
My first recording was the LPO/Rostropovich on EMI Eminence - it was re-released on CD a few years back but nla it seems . I liked the work but it was far from a recording that spoiled me for the rest - next came BPO/Karajan (DG) - excellent -- Mravinsky stereo ( a bit too intense ) - Pletnev /RNO - another excellent recording - Bernstein /NYPO - too slow undoubtedly in the finale but extraordinarily moving -Halle/Barbirolli - lovely passionate performance but strings a bit stretched and recording disappointing. Furtwangler 1938 - quite marvellous but a one-off in style all cumulative emotional power rather than whipped up excitement- Kletzki/Philharmonia - wonderfully played , idiomatic conducting very exciting and then the last recording of the work I bought ( until today when I ordered that live Fricsay ) Philharmonia/Mackerras - everything is just right , some may be more exciting in parts but as a whole a perfect library choice .
It seems that last time Mravinsky won - with Gunter Wand as modern choice ! and Mengelberg as historical favourite back in 1996.Last edited by Barbirollians; 04-06-16, 08:48.
Comment
-
Comment