I generally make my first search via Presto Classical, which is run by people who know what they're talking about.
BaL 12.03.16 - Rachmaninoff: Symphony no. 3 in A minor
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by slarty View Postmy favorite performance is Sanderling and the Berlin PO in a live concert from 1992.
contains a live performance from 1994 (in excellent NDR sound) with the NDR Symphony Orchestra - and very good it is too. The box set was/is a lot cheaper in France than in the UK but contains some excellent performances, not least his later Berlin SO Brahms cycle.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by HighlandDougie View Post
My word you got this Sanderling box quickly.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostI generally make my first search via Presto Classical, which is run by people who know what they're talking about."...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by HighlandDougie View Post
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Stanfordian View PostHiya HighlandDougie,
My word you got this Sanderling box quickly.
I'm not sure why it has taken so long in the UK but I see that I got it here in France last November, for about £22. Anyway, the Rach 3 is excellent - fine playing by what was Gunter Wand's orchestra and excellent engineering.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostWhat a magnificent work this is!
I really need to hear the Jurowski/LPO, amazed I haven't
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Robert Simpson was not impressed in 1967:-
"...neatly and economically composed, showing a refined taste, but without spur, written when the composer's creative urge was at last leaving him." Perhaps he had never heard a really gripping performance? Many critics looked down on Rachmaninov in those days!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by rauschwerk View PostRobert Simpson was not impressed in 1967:-
"...neatly and economically composed, showing a refined taste, but without spur, written when the composer's creative urge was at last leaving him." Perhaps he had never heard a really gripping performance? Many critics looked down on Rachmaninov in those days!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostHe should have listened to Svetlanov or Kletzki!
At the same time, Simpson isn't "looking down on Rachmaninov" - the fact that he speaks of a "creative urge ... at last leaving him", suggests that he acknowledged that there had been such a "spur" previously; and his comments on the First Symphony in the same article are fulsome in praise and admiration. I think his attitude to writing about Music is summed up in the concluding sentence of his Introduction to that book:
If anything in [these essays] make [the reader] cross, let us hope it will sharpen his enthusiasm as well as his temper.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostHe should have listened to Svetlanov or Kletzki!"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
Comment