Originally posted by makropulos
View Post
BaL 5.03.16 - Delius: Sea Drift
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by makropulos View PostAnd while we're about it, let's hear it for the Violin Concerto - a lovely piece.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostPhenomenally difficult to play - every recording I've heard demonstrates the player's intonation flaws (Ralph Holmes is the best, Menuhin's the worst, in this respect) - and balance problems, too; it's always a struggle to hear the flute/bassoon melody from fig 22 behind the too-far-forward Violin accompaniment!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by makropulos View PostYes, I know it's horribly hard - violinists keep telling me. Menuhin is a disaster in this piece. My own favourite is Jean Pougnet with Beecham, but Ralph Holmes is certainly one of the better modern version.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by makropulos View PostYes, I know it's horribly hard - violinists keep telling me. Menuhin is a disaster in this piece. My own favourite is Jean Pougnet with Beecham, but Ralph Holmes is certainly one of the better modern versions.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostHo hum. . . Guess which version I have.
Of the more modern recordings, Holmes seems effortlessly to 'hit the spot' and although Little's version with Mackerras is very well recorded and very passionately played, her 'quite pitch-bending' vibrato unfortunately spoils it for me... however this is a very personal and biased view, and I do have several Delius-loving friends and colleagues for whom the Little is now the 'only' version!
A few years ago I was delighted when I bought and read the Deryck Cooke book 'Vindications' ... in it there is a wonderful chapter about the Delius VC in which he totally debunks the 'received wisdom' that the concerto is 'formless and rambling', and in fact Cooke offers a very convincing 'chapter and verse' argument, showing that it is - on the contrary - a very tight 'organic' structure.Last edited by Tony Halstead; 07-03-16, 21:26.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tony View PostI, when a teenager in the 1960s, got to know this sublime piece ( Delius violin concerto) through the Albert Sammons / Liverpool ( pre-Royal) Phil/ Sargent recording on 78s and I do think that the later Pougnet/ Beecham version is in an 'almost parallel universe'.
Of the more modern recordings, Holmes seems effortlessly to 'hit the spot' and although Little's version with Mackerras is very well recorded and very passionately played, her 'quite pitch-bending' vibrato unfortunately spoils it for me... however this is a very personal and biased view, and I do have several Delius-loving friends and colleagues for whom the Little is now the 'only' version!
A few years ago I was delighted when I bought and read the Deryck Cooke book 'Vindications' ... in it there is a wonderful chapter about the Delius VC in which he totally debunks the 'received wisdom' that the concerto is 'formless and rambling', and in fact Cooke offers a very convincing 'chapter and verse' argument, showing that it is - on the contrary - a very tight 'organic' structure.
one in about 1961` at the Free Trade Hall, Manchester, played by Laurence Turner / Hallé/ Barbirolli.
Mr Turner 'did a good job' as I recall, but it wasn't a 'special performance'.
The only other one was WONDERFUL, in maybe 1965 at the Liverpool Philharmonic Hall, played by PETER MOUNTAIN ( now sadly no longer with us) with the RLPO and Sir Charles Groves.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tony View PostThe only other one was WONDERFUL, in maybe 1965 at the Liverpool Philharmonic Hall, played by PETER MOUNTAIN ( now sadly no longer with us) with the RLPO and Sir Charles Groves.
I now wonder if that's how/why we sometimes got free tickets to RLPO concerts or rehearsals?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tony View Post'LIVE' performances of the Delius violin concerto seem to be 'as rare as hens' teeth'... but I have attended TWO of them:
one in about 1961` at the Free Trade Hall, Manchester, played by Laurence Turner / Hallé/ Barbirolli.
Mr Turner 'did a good job' as I recall, but it wasn't a 'special performance'.
The only other one was WONDERFUL, in maybe 1965 at the Liverpool Philharmonic Hall, played by PETER MOUNTAIN ( now sadly no longer with us) with the RLPO and Sir Charles Groves.
Comment
-
-
I played it in the Rehearsal Orchestra with the late Harry Legge back in the 80's. The soloist was the orchestra's leader, Chris Bearman. I think, at that point, he was a player in the BBCSO. I seem to remember him saying that he played on the Menuhin sessions and it was done on two instead of three because of budget restrictions. IIRC, he felt Menuhin was very pressured by this.
I do have that cd in a big box which I should dig out.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by pastoralguy View PostI played it in the Rehearsal Orchestra with the late Harry Legge back in the 80's. The soloist was the orchestra's leader, Chris Bearman, as the soloist. I think, at that point, he was a player in the BBCSO. I seem to remember him saying that he played on the Menuhin sessions and it was done on two instead of three because of budget restrictions. IIRC, he felt Menuhin was very pressured by this.
I do have that cd in a big box which I should dig out.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostTo be honest, I wasn't too distressed about it until I read the criticism here. But then, I bought the CD for the Elgar.
Comment
-
Comment