BaL 2.01.16 - Beethoven: Symphony no. 5 in C minor

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Eine Alpensinfonie
    Host
    • Nov 2010
    • 20570

    #76
    Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View Post

    Oh, whoops, I'd forgotten my grandad's 78s - anyone fancy VPO/ Schalk?? Doesn't seem to have made it onto EA's list for some strange reason - did he get red-carded again for fiddling with the orchestration and making cuts?
    I still have that version, but it isn't on the list of available recordings.

    Comment

    • LeMartinPecheur
      Full Member
      • Apr 2007
      • 4717

      #77
      Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
      I still have that version, but it isn't on the list of available recordings.
      I checked. You can still get his 8th though.
      I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!

      Comment

      • aeolium
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 3992

        #78
        A phenomenal effort for the listing, EA, but the recording that was my very first encounter with this work, Steinberg with the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra (perhaps on an MfP or CfP label) is not there. I'm pretty sure it is still available on an EMI Icon set of Steinberg recordings, and possibly separately also.

        Comment

        • Eine Alpensinfonie
          Host
          • Nov 2010
          • 20570

          #79
          Originally posted by aeolium View Post
          A phenomenal effort for the listing, EA, but the recording that was my very first encounter with this work, Steinberg with the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra (perhaps on an MfP or CfP label) is not there. I'm pretty sure it is still available on an EMI Icon set of Steinberg recordings, and possibly separately also.
          I can find only this:

          Comment

          • Bryn
            Banned
            • Mar 2007
            • 24688

            #80
            Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
            How about this:



            and also, as a download, here.

            Comment

            • aeolium
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 3992

              #81
              Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
              There's also this in the ICON series:



              and according to one of the reviewers Beethoven 5 is on the second disc of that set.

              Comment

              • Bryn
                Banned
                • Mar 2007
                • 24688

                #82
                Originally posted by aeolium View Post
                There's also this in the ICON series:



                and according to one of the reviewers Beethoven 5 is on the second disc of that set.
                It is indeed. I have the set. Full listing here.

                However, the Icon set seems not to be a current Warner title, so the download might well be the only version with recognised current availability.

                Comment

                • Eine Alpensinfonie
                  Host
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 20570

                  #83
                  Originally posted by aeolium View Post
                  There's also this in the ICON series:



                  and according to one of the reviewers Beethoven 5 is on the second disc of that set.
                  There seem to be quite a few people selling this, so I'll add it to the list.

                  Comment

                  • Dave2002
                    Full Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 18021

                    #84
                    The reviewer thinks it's obvious that the last movement has to be grand and majestic (re Pletnev's performance which he demonstrated is faster). I accept the view that going too fast early on may lead to other problems later on, but I think the reviewer's stated view can be challenged. It is not obvious! It is perhaps just the reviewer's opinion, and not necessarily more valid than the views of the conductors who do it differently.

                    Comment

                    • Bryn
                      Banned
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 24688

                      #85
                      Originally posted by Dave2002 View Post
                      The reviewer thinks it's obvious that the last movement has to be grand and majestic (re Pletnev's performance which he demonstrated is faster). I accept the view that going too fast early on may lead to other problems later on, but I think the reviewer's stated view can be challenged. It is not obvious! It is perhaps just the reviewer's opinion, and not necessarily more valid than the views of the conductors who do it differently.
                      Not the only such assertion on his part. The metronome reference was of the same ilk, as were the spiritual connections. Difficult to object to his final choice, as a library recommendation, however.

                      Comment

                      • Barbirollians
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 11700

                        #86
                        Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                        Not the only such assertion on his part. The metronome reference was of the same ilk, as were the spiritual connections. Difficult to object to his final choice, as a library recommendation, however.
                        I thought his dismissal of the metronome marks on the basis of one quote would ruffle feathers on here !

                        I rather enjoyed the presentation and it remains extraordinary that the selected recording keeps on winning but every extract played explained why . I have not listened to it for too long .An omission that requires rectifying .

                        Comment

                        • Eine Alpensinfonie
                          Host
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 20570

                          #87
                          So what's the Eroica got that the 5th hasn't - in terms of discussable recordings?

                          Comment

                          • Eine Alpensinfonie
                            Host
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 20570

                            #88
                            Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                            So what's the Eroica got that the 5th hasn't - in terms of discussable recordings?
                            Clearly, a great deal. Where is everyone?

                            I've been listening to the broadcast on iPlayer, and it's a most refreshing review. I couldn't really see the point of the inclusion of Walter Murphy and the Big Apple Band's version, but otherwise I was hooked.

                            Comment

                            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                              Gone fishin'
                              • Sep 2011
                              • 30163

                              #89
                              Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                              Clearly, a great deal. Where is everyone?
                              I didn't understand the question

                              I've been listening to the broadcast on iPlayer, and it's a most refreshing review. I couldn't really see the point of the inclusion of Walter Murphy and the Big Apple Band's version, but otherwise I was hooked.
                              Not quite so hooked here - I was a bit irritated by the continual reference to "HIPP-lite", and the traditional sneer at Karajan, as well as the gratiuitous disco snippet that you refer to. (But then, with so few versions available, I suppose he had to fill the time somehow ) No real quarrel with his final choice, though.
                              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                              Comment

                              • Eine Alpensinfonie
                                Host
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 20570

                                #90
                                Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                                I didn't understand the question

                                I just meant that there doesn't seem to be the level of interested generated by the Eroica Symphony review. By this time on the review day of that work, we had had over 150 posts, and they were coming in thick and fast.


                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X