Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur
View Post
BaL 2.01.16 - Beethoven: Symphony no. 5 in C minor
Collapse
X
-
A phenomenal effort for the listing, EA, but the recording that was my very first encounter with this work, Steinberg with the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra (perhaps on an MfP or CfP label) is not there. I'm pretty sure it is still available on an EMI Icon set of Steinberg recordings, and possibly separately also.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by aeolium View PostA phenomenal effort for the listing, EA, but the recording that was my very first encounter with this work, Steinberg with the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra (perhaps on an MfP or CfP label) is not there. I'm pretty sure it is still available on an EMI Icon set of Steinberg recordings, and possibly separately also.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostI can find only this:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/offer-lis...condition=used
and according to one of the reviewers Beethoven 5 is on the second disc of that set.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by aeolium View PostThere's also this in the ICON series:
and according to one of the reviewers Beethoven 5 is on the second disc of that set.
However, the Icon set seems not to be a current Warner title, so the download might well be the only version with recognised current availability.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by aeolium View PostThere's also this in the ICON series:
and according to one of the reviewers Beethoven 5 is on the second disc of that set.
Comment
-
-
The reviewer thinks it's obvious that the last movement has to be grand and majestic (re Pletnev's performance which he demonstrated is faster). I accept the view that going too fast early on may lead to other problems later on, but I think the reviewer's stated view can be challenged. It is not obvious! It is perhaps just the reviewer's opinion, and not necessarily more valid than the views of the conductors who do it differently.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dave2002 View PostThe reviewer thinks it's obvious that the last movement has to be grand and majestic (re Pletnev's performance which he demonstrated is faster). I accept the view that going too fast early on may lead to other problems later on, but I think the reviewer's stated view can be challenged. It is not obvious! It is perhaps just the reviewer's opinion, and not necessarily more valid than the views of the conductors who do it differently.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostNot the only such assertion on his part. The metronome reference was of the same ilk, as were the spiritual connections. Difficult to object to his final choice, as a library recommendation, however.
I rather enjoyed the presentation and it remains extraordinary that the selected recording keeps on winning but every extract played explained why . I have not listened to it for too long .An omission that requires rectifying .
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostSo what's the Eroica got that the 5th hasn't - in terms of discussable recordings?
I've been listening to the broadcast on iPlayer, and it's a most refreshing review. I couldn't really see the point of the inclusion of Walter Murphy and the Big Apple Band's version, but otherwise I was hooked.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostClearly, a great deal. Where is everyone?
I've been listening to the broadcast on iPlayer, and it's a most refreshing review. I couldn't really see the point of the inclusion of Walter Murphy and the Big Apple Band's version, but otherwise I was hooked.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostI didn't understand the question
I just meant that there doesn't seem to be the level of interested generated by the Eroica Symphony review. By this time on the review day of that work, we had had over 150 posts, and they were coming in thick and fast.
Comment
-
Comment