BaL 21.11.15 - Bartok: Piano Concerto no. 2
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Rolmill View PostNot sure that Bryn's addition of the word "eternal" after the picture was registered by everyone....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostIt was registered by me, even though I failed to get the connection until prompted with a clue; that said, I wonder what Mr Bartók would have made of all this forum ribaldry surrounding his finest piano concerto?!...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostYou may, of course; I just don;t find that it has the substance of no. 2!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by silvestrione View PostSince I learnt the piece from the Richter/Maazel/Orchestre de Paris recording, and it was the only one I had over many years (I now have the Pollini and the Anda), it still sounds 'right' to me! Anda seems pell-mell and over excited, and Pollini less poetic than Richter.
Richter gives a wonderful account of the solo part. The way he matches piano sonorities to the brass in the first movement is astonishing. You don't forget the magic of the small number of quieter moments in that movement, too. Richter is completely at home in the idiom, rendering the crunchy harmonies memorably. The slow movement is slow, certainly, but mesmeric. In my view the orchestra give a good account of themselves. In this version, it's the slow movement of the 'Emperor' concerto you think of, not Beethoven's fourth.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by verismissimo View PostWho won?
(the winners of all BaLs are "emboldened" in the Threads OPs. (After they've been announced on the programme, of course!)[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
Comment