BaL 24.10.15 - Mozart: Symphony no. 36 in C K.425 "Linz"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Eine Alpensinfonie
    Host
    • Nov 2010
    • 20582

    #31
    Originally posted by makropulos View Post
    For your list, there's also Jochum's later recording with the Bamberg SO and Mackerras's first with the LPO (CfP)
    I'm not sure whether either of these is generally available.

    Comment

    • Eine Alpensinfonie
      Host
      • Nov 2010
      • 20582

      #32
      I don't really need any more recordings of this, but I shall be listening with interest - such a fine work.

      Comment

      • verismissimo
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 2957

        #33
        Originally posted by verismissimo View Post
        ... Walter seeming sleepy.
        Brahms in breeches, according to Richard Wigmore!

        Comment

        • DracoM
          Host
          • Mar 2007
          • 13009

          #34
          Slightly off-message, but isn't it weird when you know that CD Review is ALL pre-recorded? All carefully scripted, no fudges, no fluffs, no spontaneity.

          Wigmore's Linz Trip OK. Mckerras for me.

          Comment

          • verismissimo
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 2957

            #35
            Mackerras with the SCO it is.

            Comment

            • BBMmk2
              Late Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 20908

              #36
              Originally posted by verismissimo View Post
              Mackerras with the SCO it is.
              I have already! :) I have, also Abbado/Orchestra Mozart, the reduced sized Berliners, I was wondering?
              Don’t cry for me
              I go where music was born

              J S Bach 1685-1750

              Comment

              • mikealdren
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 1223

                #37
                Originally posted by DracoM View Post
                Slightly off-message, but isn't it weird when you know that CD Review is ALL pre-recorded? All carefully scripted, no fudges, no fluffs, no spontaneity.
                It's much better than the unscripted (or are they?) discussions between AMcG and ANother reviewer.

                Comment

                • silvestrione
                  Full Member
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 1741

                  #38
                  Not much interest here I see. Must admit, listening in the afternoon, I nodded off!
                  Hardly surprising. Fairly ordinary Mozart (i.e. marvellous symphony) but not a major work. Are we not due one of the last four by now?

                  Comment

                  • Eine Alpensinfonie
                    Host
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 20582

                    #39
                    Originally posted by silvestrione View Post
                    Fairly ordinary Mozart (i.e. marvellous symphony) but not a major work. Are we not due one of the last four by now?
                    Can't agree about it not being a major work.

                    Also no. 41 was a BaL work not so long ago (April 2012)

                    Comment

                    • Alison
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 6493

                      #40
                      Surprisingly little interest. Or was it axiomatic that Mackerras would win as per my message #2?

                      Comment

                      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                        Gone fishin'
                        • Sep 2011
                        • 30163

                        #41
                        Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                        Can't agree about it not being a major work.
                        (and not just because of the key, either.)

                        As usual, good stuff from Richard Wigmore - I don't feel any great urgency to add the chosen one to my shopping basket, but I'm contemplating the Klemperer box: I identified it before he revealed the answer - many moons ago (before the Judge told me to stop) I used to have the LP boxed set of OK's Mozart orchestral works. I've often felt that he was a much finer conductor of Mozart than of Beethoven.

                        And wasn't Busch a superb Musician!
                        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                        Comment

                        • visualnickmos
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 3617

                          #42
                          Originally posted by silvestrione View Post
                          Not much interest here I see. Must admit, listening in the afternoon, I nodded off!
                          Hardly surprising. Fairly ordinary Mozart (i.e. marvellous symphony) but not a major work. Are we not due one of the last four by now?
                          What exactly constitutes a 'major work?'

                          Comment

                          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                            Gone fishin'
                            • Sep 2011
                            • 30163

                            #43
                            Originally posted by verismissimo View Post
                            Brahms in breeches, according to Richard Wigmore!
                            Yes - but this comment only "works" if Brahms is played badly! And didn't RW say that the actual recorded performance of the Siciliano was fleeter of foot than the rehearsal sequence that we overheard? I think it was of these rehearsal out-takes that Stravinsky complained that Walter kept urging his players to "sing" the phrases more, whereas it might have been better had he given them equal encouragement to dance.
                            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                            Comment

                            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                              Gone fishin'
                              • Sep 2011
                              • 30163

                              #44
                              Originally posted by visualnickmos View Post
                              What exactly constitutes a 'major work?'
                              Well, K425 for one!
                              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                              Comment

                              • visualnickmos
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 3617

                                #45
                                Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                                Well, K425 for one!
                                Agreed!

                                But maybe I should be more accurate in my question; what are the criteria on which a work is judged to be a 'major work?'

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X