Originally posted by richardfinegold
View Post
BaL 05.04.25 - Shostakovich: Symphony 10
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Wolfram View PostI think it is possible to hear this symphony in different ways. I hear it not so literally but more metaphysically; as an expression of pure terror. And what could be more Stalinist than terror itself. But as Hans Keller used to say: the one does not preclude the other.
Part of the pity of Testimony is that it turned him from someone whose works were supposedly all in the service of the Soviet state to someone whose works were supposedly all barely-concealed dissidence, which is certainly an improvement but still reduces his music to politics by other means. I wonder if Shostakovich ever heard of Vaughan Williams’s “it seems not to occur to these people that a man might just want to write a piece of music”.
Comment
-
-
Certainly I don't think that's occured to some of Shostakovitch's commentators!
Yes of course a symphonist must be affected by the times he lives in and this will filter through his subconscious into the music; hence all the 'nervous' sounding symphonies written during thr 'Cold War'. But that's a different matter from asserting that the composer was writing programme music. .
Comment
-
-
I don’t think this symphony is programme music at all; but no matter what is happening in the music terror is never very far away. The repeated horn motto in the allegretto is also the same sequence of notes as the nightmarish ape theme that occurs in the first song of Das Lied Von Der Erde, whilst having the same eerie qualities as a Mahlerian nachtmusik; and just before the movement ends there is a climax of shattering violence which grows out of something resembling the klezmer of the piano trio. Even the jaunty little tune in the last movement each time it tries to assert itself towards the end gets brutally stamped out. I don’t know what to make of any of it. The whole atmosphere in this work is unsettling, ambiguous and disorientating; the final abrupt, almost dismissive, cord for me recalls the end of Brahms 4.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by HighlandDougie View Post
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Wolfram View PostI don’t think this symphony is programme music at all; but no matter what is happening in the music terror is never very far away. The repeated horn motto in the allegretto is also the same sequence of notes as the nightmarish ape theme that occurs in the first song of Das Lied Von Der Erde, whilst having the same eerie qualities as a Mahlerian nachtmusik; and just before the movement ends there is a climax of shattering violence which grows out of something resembling the klezmer of the piano trio. Even the jaunty little tune in the last movement each time it tries to assert itself towards the end gets brutally stamped out. I don’t know what to make of any of it. The whole atmosphere in this work is unsettling, ambiguous and disorientating; the final abrupt, almost dismissive, cord for me recalls the end of Brahms 4.
It is indeed a name: Elmira, as in Elmira Nazirova, mentioned upthread a couple of times. Apparently he wrote to her how interesting it was that her name, if translated into notes, was very like the beginning of Das Lied von der Erde. She was his student for a couple of years until he was dismissed in 1948 as part of the Zhdanov crackdown. I think their correspondence continued until he married his second wife in 1956. (Nazirova married in 1948; Shostakovich’s first marriage ended with the death of his wife in 1954.)
The fact that the movement dies out on the same chord (C major with added major sixth) as the last song of the Mahler (Der Abschied) is of course also susceptible to interpretation.
Nazirova herself revealed that story in 1990. Since none of it pops up in Testimony, I am forced to conclude that even if it is genuinely the transcribed memoirs of Shostakovich (which I personally don’t believe), he left the non-political stuff out, which would limit its usefulness in illuminating his music anyway.Last edited by oliver sudden; 20-03-25, 10:51.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oliver sudden View Post
If I were to go to my shelf and find my copy missing without trace, I would buy that copy in a heartbeat.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Gargoyle View PostI have 2 CDs of the tenth, Ancerl and Shipway. I prefer the Shipway. The recorded sound on the Ancerl gets in the way, for me.
Frank Shipway; that takes me back to the 1970s, Walthamstow Town Hall and the Forest Phiharmonic.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oliver sudden View Post
As soon as I learnt about the DSCH motive in the third movement of the 10th I thought to myself: that horn call must also mean something. I forget if I thought it must also be a name.
It is indeed a name: Elmira, as in Elmira Nazirova, mentioned upthread a couple of times. Apparently he wrote to her how interesting it was that her name, if translated into notes, was very like the beginning of Das Lied von der Erde. She was his student for a couple of years until he was dismissed in 1948 as part of the Zhdanov crackdown. I think their correspondence continued until he married his second wife in 1956. (Nazirova married in 1948; Shostakovich’s first marriage ended with the death of his wife in 1954.)
The fact that the movement dies out on the same chord (C major with added major sixth) as the last song of the Mahler (Der Abschied) is of course also susceptible to interpretation.
Nazirova herself revealed that story in 1990. Since none of it pops up in Testimony, I am forced to conclude that even if it is genuinely the transcribed memoirs of Shostakovich (which I personally don’t believe), he left the non-political stuff out, which would limit its usefulness in illuminating his music anyway.
Comment
-
Comment