Originally posted by Barbirollians
View Post
BaL 15.02.25 - Puccini: La bohème
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
Serafin’s La Boheme was Decca surely not EMI ?
Been a bit of a week for musical confusion - the highlight of which was me at a Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra interval reception congratulating a bemused audience member on her magnificent performance of the Elgar Cello Concerto. Well she looked a bit like the cellist ,,,,
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostSame old story - Andrew McGregor whinging about the sound in Beecham. Sounds fine to me and always has done.
There was a persistent rumour that this Boheme was recorded in stereo. It wasn't, but was recorded on two tracks - vocals on one and orchestra on the other, and I think various attempts have been made with such recordings to pretend that they are in stereo by panning the voices one side then the other, sometimes to comic effect! Eg. tenor on the left, soprano on the right when singing solo, but when they come together for that love duet....well, they can't be separated!!
Comment
-
-
The truth to be fair is that Pappano is the star of this La Boheme rather than the singers . Votto got chucked out without explanation despite Callas and Moffo being praised.
I think that was illustrated by the final extracts and the Act 3 piece played - where to my ears the fabulous singing on the Beecham was much more moving than the good singing on the Pappano.Last edited by Barbirollians; 16-02-25, 11:53.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostThe truth to be fair is that Pappano is the star of this La Boheme rather than the singers . Votto got chucked out without explanation despite Callas and Moffo being praised.
I think that was illustrated by the final extracts and the Act 3 piece played - where to my ears the fabulous singing on the Beecham was much more moving than the good singing on the Pappano.
Comment
-
-
I went to look up Gramophone's review of the Pappano and found the Gramophone Collection of Nov 1996 by Michael Oliver just after the Pappano came out - Beecham won by a whisker from Votto with Toscanini, Berrottini, HVK and Solti on the shortlist
He said this about the Pappano
" Pappano has more character and more bright ideas about the wrok than his mostly young cast ...too often he upstages them ,the amplitude of the orchestra forcing them to use more voice than they should . , it is Pappano's Boheme not theirs "
Richard Fairman was also critical in his review a month earlier - feeling it should have been better than it was and that Alagna and Vaduva were not in best voice .
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Roger Webb View Post
And me! But.....on SLS 896 it has artificial reverb added...in stereo!
There was a persistent rumour that this Boheme was recorded in stereo. It wasn't, but was recorded on two tracks - vocals on one and orchestra on the other, and I think various attempts have been made with such recordings to pretend that they are in stereo by panning the voices one side then the other, sometimes to comic effect! Eg. tenor on the left, soprano on the right when singing solo, but when they come together for that love duet....well, they can't be separated!!
SLS 896, which is the re-issue I have, was re-mixed from the three track tapes by A C Griffiths, who also transferred many 78 recordings for LP, incl. Elgar Edition RLS 708 and 713, and Beecham's Delius for World. Records in two volumes.
BTW. Bjorling and De los Angeles were contracted to remake Boheme in stereo in 1961 but unfortunately Bjorling died the year before and by the time they got round to a replacement De los Angeles (who had actually begun to record her part) was pregnant, so a young Mirella Freni was recruited along with Nicholai Gedda, and Thomas Schippers conducted Rome Opera.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Roger Webb View Post
After a bit more research I find that a three track recorder was used with voices on one, orchestra on another and chorus on the other.
SLS 896, which is the re-issue I have, was re-mixed from the three track tapes by A C Griffiths, who also transferred many 78 recordings for LP, incl. Elgar Edition RLS 708 and 713, and Beecham's Delius for World. Records in two volumes.
BTW. Bjorling and De los Angeles were contracted to remake Boheme in stereo in 1961 but unfortunately Bjorling died the year before and by the time they got round to a replacement De los Angeles (who had actually begun to record her part) was pregnant, so a young Mirella Freni was recruited along with Nicholai Gedda, and Thomas Schippers conducted Rome Opera.
I have always wished Barbirolli had recorded it after his marvellous Rome Butterfly.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostI went to look up Gramophone's review of the Pappano and found the Gramophone Collection of Nov 1996 by Michael Oliver just after the Pappano came out - Beecham won by a whisker from Votto with Toscanini, Berrottini, HVK and Solti on the shortlist
He said this about the Pappano
" Pappano has more character and more bright ideas about the wrok than his mostly young cast ...too often he upstages them ,the amplitude of the orchestra forcing them to use more voice than they should . , it is Pappano's Boheme not theirs "
Richard Fairman was also critical in his review a month earlier - feeling it should have been better than it was and that Alagna and Vaduva were not in best voice .Last edited by Barbirollians; 17-02-25, 22:11.
Comment
-
-
I only had Callas/Votto on tape so bought a copy of Warner’s 2014 remastering . The improvement in sound quality is amazing and it brings the subtlety of her Mimi into sharp focus . Moffo is terrific , Di Stefano sounds like young poet and the rest of the cast especially Panerai are good too . It could not sound more different yo Beecham but it sounds like their lives were tough which in Beecham’s gorgeous sound world one might forget.
Callas is magnificent in Act 4.
Comment
-
Comment