Does anyone know/praise the Weissenberg/Karajan recording? I was listening to them in the C minor concerto (no.3) this morning and felt it was very neatly played and well recorded but cool and detached, like a play-through. They made quite a few records together and it was, I think , Herbert's only complete set of the concertos, so it's curious to hear so little passion or depth.
BaL 04.01.25 - Beethoven: Piano concerto 1
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by pastoralguy View Post
Iirc, BaL started in the 1950’s when there comparatively few recordings of even the most popular works and LPs were very expensive. So I suppose it was seen as a good way of helping the new listeners to music build a good solid collection without making expensive mistakes. (Pretty much the reason I sill read Gramophone).
However, with so many recordings available for a comparatively small subscription fee, it does seem to be becoming redundant. It’ll be a shame when it’ll no doubt be eventually axed as a sign of ‘progress’.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostDon’t give Sam Jackson ideas ! ..................
Rather, its an ideal opportunity to present the case for something more analytical, with comparisons and choices within the various categories that are evident (don't mention "interpretations on record" - if we can hope for a steer away from the present sorry state, it would have to be a bold, new initiative thought up by the new controller....)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Hitch View PostI'm fond of the Melvyn Tan/Norrington/London Classical Players recording...
Available on CD
.
Comment
-
-
No mention of Argerich even when discussing Uchida and the few women who have recorded it - absolutely beggars belief.Last edited by Barbirollians; 04-01-25, 15:48.
Comment
-
-
Gilels wins again but this time in 1968 with Szell - seeing off Brendel and Zimerman both with Rattle and Barenboim/Klemperer.
I struggle,however, to consider this a proper survey without any discussion of Argerich and Perahia. Brautigam was illustrated more than once .
i have the Gilels but have not listened to it often . On a CD I bought many moons ago in Hong Kong it was coupled with the sensational Third from that set .
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostI am not sure that J McG will choose a recent piano version - after all as noted above she chose Gilels/Ludwig for the Fourth.
On the clip evidence I preferred Schiff and Lupu.
Argerich a surprising absence as this is a work she plays very well. In some of her other performances it’s all a bit too hard driven for me.
Comment
-
Comment