Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben
View Post
BaL 13.07.24 - Shostakovich: Symphony 5
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Retune View Postthe Kondrashin had an extra level of excitement and I was fine with the sound quality.
As far as I’m concerned it’s unassailable as a single-conductor cycle.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ucanseetheend View Post
Agreed it was excellent. But not exactly a" Classical music " programmeLast edited by LMcD; 14-07-24, 11:46.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oliver sudden View PostThe sound of the Kondrashin cycle on CD was pretty ropey in the Chant du Monde days. I think it was back in the noughts that a new remastering using the original tapes came out, from the Korean label Aulos. No comparison as far as sound quality goes. I don’t actually know whether the subsequent Melodiya reissue is the same remastering, or if it’s different how it compares.
As far as I’m concerned it’s unassailable as a single-conductor cycle.
Comment
-
-
Although the reality that said files presumably belong to Melodiya brings that thought down to earth a bit.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by edashtav View Post
Yes, a poorly conceived and badly structured BaL. There seems to be room for a finely played, wisely interpreted, new version to complete with the faded sound of Soviet lions and the patchy American conductors.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Postsounds very compressed on FM and as Andrew has pointed out some instruments are weirdly forward in the balance (spot mic ing again) but musically very fine.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post
Yes well that got rather glossed over . The Previn sounded fine (technically )* way better than Bernstein NYPhil , Mravinsky and Kondrashin.
*also musically - better than fine in fact."Perfection is not attainable,but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence"
Comment
-
Comment