Originally posted by oliver sudden
View Post
BaL 15.06.24 - Strauss: Also sprach Zarathustra
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by oliver sudden View PostOne of those orchestral moments where if you do manage to do the basically impossible thing the composer asks for, your reward is to be completely inaudible.
There are some fine attempts at it in this famous contrabassoon audition!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Petrushka View Post
Incidentally, I can't agree with those who say that the rest of the work is boring after the spectacular introduction. I found it an absorbing piece from the start and still do.
!
Comment
-
-
Ah yes, watching the audience reminds me of an RFH concert yeras ago where the sponsors filled the Royal Box with their guests, whose idea of classical music was probably 'The Blue Danube'. Instead they got Varese's Ameriques,and the looks of consternation on their faces as it reached its madly-stomping climax was a sight to see.
Comment
-
-
Whether it's 'true' or not I couldn't say without an authoritative source in front of me. That subtitle is quoted in numerous descriptions of the work, but I have yet to see a specific source mentioned (e.g. a dated, surviving letter in Strauss' hand) .
Often, I think, programme-note writers repeat phrases from earlier writers without checking their accuracy. For instance, many writers on Michael Tippett have repeated that he is Cornish or that his family came from Cornwall, but Oliver Soden's extensive research revealed no basis whatever for this assumption. Similarly, a recent biography of Benjamin Britten claimed that Alma Mahler asked Britten to complete her late husband's tenth symphony, and that Vaughan Williams bought a Rolls-Royce simply because Britten owned one. I know of no verification for these two highly unlikely claims.
At any rate, the Strauss quote does seem more liekly to me that either of the last two!
Comment
-
-
I've had Karajan '73 since its release on Lp and Fritz Reiner/Chicago, also on Lp made by RCA (their first stereo with Reiner) in Orchestra Hall. Both have terrific sound, but the Karajan has the edge in string playing - particularly Michel Schwalbé's solo violin playing.
On CD I've the Kempe box, and the 'Also' is very good but not as pleasing as the above two. Oh, and my favourite CD release of the Karajan '74, a promotional copy in a sweet little imitation Lp sleeve given to me by the Polygram rep.
The Qobuz presentation of the Karajan '73 is particularly successful in 24bt 96k.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Goon525 View PostWhether we agree with the verdict or not, I thought Jonathan Cross - a new name to me - did a pretty good job. I’d like him to have explained why, both for Karajan and Nelsons, he played from their earlier recordings in preference to the later ones.
This Gramophone review might be interesting
Strauss’s tone-poem may have been hijacked by the movies but there’s far more to the score than that famous sunrise, argues Philip Clark, as he seeks the finest recording
BTW. I was a bit mystified by CD McG's comment that the Reiner/Chicago he (claimed to have) played was the 1962 RCA Red Seal/living Stereo recording.
The RCA Red Seal is the 1962 one, but the Living Stereo is the 1954 recording - which is a Red Seal recording! But the '62 was never a Living Stereo....so which did he play?
Last edited by Roger Webb; 17-06-24, 15:11.
Comment
-
-
It provided a good work-out for the subwoofer - notably the Philharmonia/Bychkov recording - and I'm glad that I listened to the programme as Jonathan Cross was articulate and reasoned in his comments. Not that I have anything against the Vasily Petrenko recording but I thought that there was a touch of, "hmm, the 1972 Karajan would be too obvious a choice". ASZ still comes fairly high on my list of works to be avoided if at all possible - I really don't like Richard Strauss - and, alas, today's programme didn't alter my no doubt stupid antipathy.
Comment
-
Comment