It is perhaps when I listen to old recordings of BaL, that I am most pointedly reminded of what was lost when the 'two hander' approach was allowed to live, rather than being strangled at birth as the idea surely warranted. There follows Richard Osborne's closing paragraph on reviewing Mahler 6. This type of scholarly erudition is probably sneered-at in the corridors of the BBC now. But I, for one, lament its loss. Can you imagine any reviewer trying to insert this among Andrew's constant chatter?
"Herbert von Karajan once remarked that he ranked Mahler's sixth, with the fourth of Brahms and Sibelius, as symphonies which end, as he put it, in complete catastrophe.
Most Mahler symphonies end in triumph or in sincere, heaven-sent deliquescence; but not the sixth. The solemn, plucked 'A' which ushers in the coda, and its paler reiteration at the end, are like so many clods of earth falling on Mahler's coffin, whilst the four trombones - solemn pallbearers - grind out a slow fugato, and the soured minor tryad is heard for the very last time. It's a grim defeat in the midst of personal plenty; eerily prophetic of the catastrophies which were to befall first Mahler, then his family and finally, in 1914, Europe itself."
"Herbert von Karajan once remarked that he ranked Mahler's sixth, with the fourth of Brahms and Sibelius, as symphonies which end, as he put it, in complete catastrophe.
Most Mahler symphonies end in triumph or in sincere, heaven-sent deliquescence; but not the sixth. The solemn, plucked 'A' which ushers in the coda, and its paler reiteration at the end, are like so many clods of earth falling on Mahler's coffin, whilst the four trombones - solemn pallbearers - grind out a slow fugato, and the soured minor tryad is heard for the very last time. It's a grim defeat in the midst of personal plenty; eerily prophetic of the catastrophies which were to befall first Mahler, then his family and finally, in 1914, Europe itself."
Comment