What's missing from the Chausson ? My CD of the BBC Legends performance seems to be 28 minutes long like the You Tube performance ?
BaL 13.04.24 - Brahms: Symphony 3
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostWhat's missing from the Chausson ? My CD of the BBC Legends performance seems to be 28 minutes long like the You Tube performance ?
This (with the Brahms) has only part of the Chausson:
Evgeny Svetlanov conducts Debussy & Brahms. ica classics: ICAC5123. Buy CD or download online. Janet Baker (mezzo-soprano) London Symphony Orchestra, Evgeny Svetlanov
whereas this is complete:
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by makropulos View Post
I was at that concert – an amazing programme (Brahms, Chausson, Debussy). It's a shame the BBC Legends release didn't include the whole of Dame Janet's Chausson!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
There is a BBC Legends with Baker also singing Nuits d’Ete with Giulini and the Song of the Woodbird which includes a complete performance of the Chausson .
Comment
-
-
Yikes! I recently took delivery of a BRILLIANT Classics set of the Brahms Symphonies conducted by Jaap van Zweden with the Netherlands Philharmonic Orchestra and the Radio Philharmonic Orchestra, Holland.
I’ve only heard the Third Symphony so far but, imho it’s terrific! (Netherlands Orchestra). Lots of contra faggot!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by pastoralguy View PostYikes! I recently took delivery of a BRILLIANT Classics set of the Brahms Symphonies conducted by Jaap van Zweden with the Netherlands Philharmonic Orchestra and the Radio Philharmonic Orchestra, Holland.
I’ve only heard the Third Symphony so far but, imho it’s terrific! (Netherlands Orchestra). Lots of contra faggot!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post
I think there are certain works where I would expect the exposition repeat - most of the Beethoven symphonies example. The exposition of Brahms 3 isn’t that long really - about 3’ 30 “in Abbado .Brahms’ modulatory passage (A minor back to F ) couldn’t be more perfunctory- a mere two bars.
A lot of conductors don’t do the exposition repeat in Brahms 2 - a pity as Brahms actually writes a few more bars for that. I like to hear the repeat in the 3rd mainly because JB spends time in the development working through his material in that way he has so that it’s quite nice to have it fixed in your mind. I’m not even sure that he hasn’t started manipulating the material in the exposition - which is thematically so dense .I can think or worse ways of spending 3 mins 30 on this planet.
That Abbado recording is excellent.
I don’t really buy the literary analogy as a reason for not doing exposition repeats. Besides anything else, most symphonies or sonatas will in any case have a more or less literal, non-optional, repeat of some of their material at some point in the structure, since that’s basically how sonata form works. Whereas if you were reading a book and came upon a passage you’d read before, you’d think something had gone wrong at the printers.
To me the important thing is the balance of the amount of time the music spends on being expository and the amount of time it spends being developmental, since those things _feel_ completely different and that deeply affects how I experience the form. I honestly don’t know a piece of music where I don’t want to hear the repeats, at least given that it’s a piece I would bother listening to in the first place!
Comment
-
Comment