I have been looking at recent and forthcoming works discussed in BAL. Am I the only person disappointed by the choice of composers; all those discussed this season have been "standard repertory" composers, even if some of the works are not the most frequently performed by the composers (eg Stravinsky's Soldiers Tale, which requires an unusual combination of instruments plus actor(s)). I note that the next 3 works for discussion are: Haydn Symphony 100, Schubert Symphony 9 and Handel op6 Concerti Grossi. If the purpose of BAL is to encourage listeners to extend their collection, might not a more adventurous selection of works be made? An earlier symphony by Haydn perhaps (how about the Philosopher?), a Handel oratorio other than Messiah (I know that Saul was discussed a few years ago, but there are several others) or Schubert's Arpeggione Sonata, to cover versions played on the arpeggione (Presto lists a few) as well as the more familiar viola or cello, to look no further than these three composers. In addition, I don't think that Weber has ever been covered in BAL, nor Schoenberg (sesquicentenary this autumn!), Bax, Bridge or many others.
I have no idea how works for discussion are decided - would R3 management be open to suggestions from listeners? Also, I am not keen on the idea that reviewers have to be either performers or academics, but that is another topic!
I have no idea how works for discussion are decided - would R3 management be open to suggestions from listeners? Also, I am not keen on the idea that reviewers have to be either performers or academics, but that is another topic!
In fairness to Mr K it was written 12 years ago. He may have appreciated the education BaL has given him since then. May even write another disapproving piece - from the 'elitist' point of view.
Comment