Originally posted by vinteuil
View Post
BaL 13.06.15 - Monteverdi: Il Ritorno d'Ulisse
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View PostIn her defence, not that she needs it from me, her pronunciation stems from a deep knowledge of the languages concerned, rather than pronunciation written out phonetically on her script (no names no pack drill). This is the scholar who once apparently considered becoming a nun (so Andrew once told us) as being the only way to gain access to manuscripts barred to female lay scholars in Spanish monasteries......
To restore a little context to the learned Lord Justice's somewhat selective citations, however, I did also say
Originally posted by Caliban View PostI enjoyed listening to this BAL ...Tess K's demanding approach appealed to me"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View PostThis is the scholar who once apparently considered becoming a nun (so Andrew once told us) as being the only way to gain access to manuscripts barred to female lay scholars in Spanish monasteries......[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostOh, we've all tried that one!
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Richard Tarleton
Originally posted by Caliban View PostSo Tess K's demanding approach appealed to me
PS
Comment
-
Originally posted by Caliban View PostOK faced with this submission from Richard Tarleton QC and the dire judgment of Vinteuil LJ, I retract, I retract !!!
[/COLOR]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostI don't. I'm all for Radio 3 being demanding - there's precious little of that. However, when the demands become dogma, then it's time to reconsider.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post... but I did not detect "dogma". When Dr Knighton deplored earlier interpreters' cutting / changing scenes, as if they lacked confidence in Monteverdi's knowing what he intended, she said "they wouldn't dare do that with Wagner!" - and I agree. I can't see why we should accept - with the knowledge we now have, thanks to the work of scholars such as Dr Knighton - as a potential 'Building a Library' choice any interpretation which misses out or mis-places significant scenes. Would you disagree?
The reviewer of The Tales of Hoffman took a tolerant view of switching the acts. Ditto Mahler 6.
Personally I respect choices made by the likes of Harnoncourt and Leppard, even when I don't necessarily agree with them.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostYes and no. I don't like cuts at all, but Bohm made them in his highly regarded 1966 Ring.
The reviewer of The Tales of Hoffman took a tolerant view of switching the acts. Ditto Mahler 6.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostWhat makes you think I haven't?"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
Comment