Originally posted by smittims
View Post
BaL 28.10.23 - Schubert Four Impromptus Op.142 (D935)
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post
If in a reductionist view of the world a legato cantabile style of playing is feminine ( eg, Myra Hess but also Stephen Kovachevich ) and a loud flashy high intensity style ( Horowitz , Janis ) is masculine I prefer the former. Thing is though Hess could play loud and Horowitz could float a cantabile line when he wanted to like no one else.
It’s all nonsense really.
To go back to Smittens initial statement, he picked a pair of female pianists who were not known for storming the heavens, but more for playing legato, canticle, etc as others, particularly Alpie, have elucidated. Was there a time when female pianists were expected to have these qualities? Certainly the less aggressive style would have fit the pigeon hole that women of past times were supposed to be the weaker, submissive sex and were not supposed to compete in many fields with men. Those expectations have long been quashed, and with them have gone the expectations that female musicians must sound prissy and dainty. Edith Piaf had long ago given way to Janis Joplin and Chrissy Hyde, and Martha Argerich, Wang, Katia Buniatshvili , etc are not branded with a scarlet A ( for aggressive ).
Except that we can have it all, can’t we? There will always be an audience fhat values the chanteuse (Diana Krall, Taylor Swift) versus the more Amazonian Patti Smith type, and Pianists of whatever gender that sound more like Beatrice Rana and less like Marta Argerich will also have their place at the Piano Bench
Comment
-
-
I have that Bishop-Kovacevich/ Argerich disc, Mandryka, and I was struck by your reminiscence. When some years ago Kovacevich re-recorded the Diabelli Variations, a man I know called it a very masculine performance. So there you go...!
I really think it too 'woke' to call 'sexist' a suggestion that female pianists may reveal something in Schubert. It reminds me of 'Woman's Hour the other day when a remark that a particular woman was 'good looking' was slammed as 'misogynist'. Whatever next?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post
I would love to know what “different angle “ female interpreters bring. It strikes me that any successful interpretation of a piece of music involves the synthesis of the masculine and feminine - in so far as those very loose terms can be defined. Are octave and FF block chord passages masculine ? Are floating cantabile melodies feminine ? It’s all a bit of a nonsense isn’t it?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostI have that Bishop-Kovacevich/ Argerich disc, Mandryka, and I was struck by your reminiscence. When some years ago Kovacevich re-recorded the Diabelli Variations, a man I know called it a very masculine performance. So there you go...!
I really think it too 'woke' to call 'sexist' a suggestion that female pianists may reveal something in Schubert. It reminds me of 'Woman's Hour the other day when a remark that a particular woman was 'good looking' was slammed as 'misogynist'. Whatever next?
I was going to post this yesterday, to lighten things up, but thought the better of it. Here goes
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostI really think it too 'woke' to call 'sexist' a suggestion that female pianists may reveal something in Schubert
Comment
-
-
Did Emil Gilels really record it all or just the first one? His name is in the list in the first post. His recording of the first of the set is worth a listen I think.
I listened to an unavailable recording today, Agustin Anievas. It’s a pity it’s never been commercially transferred - it’s very well judged IMO.
I also listened to Trudelies Leonhardt. She takes nearly 15 minutes for the first impromptu - that’s a record possibly. Is there a tempo indication in the score?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mandryka View PostDid Emil Gilels really record it all or just the first one? His name is in the list in the first post. His recording of the first of the set is worth a listen I think.
I listened to an unavailable recording today, Agustin Anievas. It’s a pity it’s never been commercially transferred - it’s very well judged IMO.
I also listened to Trudelies Leonhardt. She takes nearly 15 minutes for the first impromptu - that’s a record possibly. Is there a tempo indication in the score?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by RichardB View PostI thought you might. Woke: "aware of and actively attentive to important societal facts and issues (especially issues of racial and social justice)" (Merriam-Webster)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by RichardB View PostI thought you might. Woke: "aware of and actively attentive to important societal facts and issues (especially issues of racial and social justice)" (Merriam-Webster)
(Merriam-Webster)
Comment
-
-
Sokolov’s tempos seemed too slow for me at first, but then began to make sense over time. And his lyrical beautiful sound and meticulous attention to detail are astonishing in a live performance. Pires is always wonderful, albeit sometimes harsh and too impetuous for Schubert. The newest release in this list is by Gerardo Teissonniere, which includes the first set Op.90 as well, all beautifully played with long singing lines throughout and great attention to the score with tempos not as slow as Sokolov’s but with great understanding of the music and style. Lupu has always been a classic favorite, but by comparison to newer recordings is beginning to sound “old”. Perahia’s sound is gorgeous but his tempos are too fast in both F minors for my preference.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Kamisama View Post
2 disapproving : politically liberal or progressive (as in matters of racial and social justice) especially in a way that is considered unreasonable or extreme
(Merriam-Webster)
Returning to Schubert though: all the recorded performances of these pieces (and his other piano music) I spend most time with are the intimate and even introverted ones (this is also where having the period instrument helps). This music doesn't seem to me to belong in thousand-seat concert halls but in surroundings where you can listen into the resonances of the instrument.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Kamisama View Post
2 disapproving : politically liberal or progressive (as in matters of racial and social justice) especially in a way that is considered unreasonable or extreme
(Merriam-Webster)
Comment
-
-
https://www.for3.org/forums/forum/cl...11#post1286811 Right on the mark regarding Schubert’s intimate quality. True, his music was written for a very different instrument than the relative monstrosity his music is nowadays recorded on. But would he have loved the gentle, subtle treatment and nuances modern pianos can also produce?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by manchester0826 View Postwould he have loved the gentle, subtle treatment and nuances modern pianos can also produce?
Comment
-
Comment