Many thanks Richard, I'll get the CD shop on the case tomorrow.
BaL 6.06.15 - Nielsen: Symphony no. 3
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by umslopogaas View PostThanks Bryn, it seems a bit indulgent to buy 60 CDs to get one, but the rest look interesting too, so I might indulge.
Comment
-
-
For once I do have a clear favourite - Royal Stockholm PO/Oramo, the latest issue of all. It has all the power you could want in passages like the crazy waltz episode in the 1st movement (best I've ever heard), but an expressive subtlety, a light and shade of sound and phrase that is exceptionally fresh and idiomatic. The finale is wonderfully crisp and upbeat.
Having revisited it often, I've also grown fonder of the NYPO/Gilbert too. Perhaps just a bit too "thoughtfully lingering" here and there, but with far greater subtlety than Bernstein's pioneering classic with the Royal Danish Orchestra nearly 5 decades before. Yes, the Bernstein is great in its way, but I find it just too overbearing now, almost bludgeoning in the 1st and 3rd movements especially. It can inspire devotion, but if you love the piece you need to hear one of the latest issues mentioned above, which also benefit greatly from hi-res sound in their 24-bit download guise. They're both very transparent, natural and spacious, allowing that essential Nielsonian naturlaut, lightness & danceability to dwell alongside all the power and energy.
I've always had a problem with Blomstedt's SFSO readings. Earlier this year I lived for a few weeks with the DRSO set, on the Japanese EMI Forte edition (no obvious evidence of remastering, but great sound anyway...).
Every time I compared the Espansiva I had a strong preference for the DRSO one - more spacious and atmospheric, greater warmth and affection in performance and sound (very obvious at the start of the slow movement). But still with stunning brilliance and power in the brassy climaxes! More open and fulfilling than in San Francisco. This was true of almost the whole set, but especially of 1-3 and 6. The SFSO readings always sound a bit too sleek and clinical, albeit the orchestra is more disciplined in 4 and 5, their best efforts.
So much to say so little time..., but I do think recordings like Bernstein and SFSO/Blomstedt have become wrongly sacrosanct, probably because of earlier appraisal when the music was less familiar, and competition so thin... (Most of the Gramophone reviews of the SFSO pre-dated the remastered DRSO cycle, the late 1990s EMI Forte).
(Good discussion of the 3rd here by Andrew Mellor - http://www.gramophone.co.uk/blog/the...nnial-symphony) (but pre-Oramo or Gilbert!)
And here's Dan Morgan (mahlerei) on Oramo...
Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 29-05-15, 20:20.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View PostI hear that The John Storgards version/cycle, is rather good. Anyone else know?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostFor once I do have a clear favourite - Royal Stockholm PO/Oramo, the latest issue of all. It has all the power you could want in passages like the crazy waltz episode in the 1st movement (best I've ever heard), but an expressive subtlety, a light and shade of sound and phrase that is exceptionally fresh and idiomatic. The finale is wonderfully crisp and upbeat.
Having revisited it often, I've also grown fonder of the NYPO/Gilbert too. Perhaps just a bit too "thoughtfully lingering" here and there, but with far greater subtlety than Bernstein's pioneering classic with the Royal Danish Orchestra nearly 5 decades before. Yes, the Bernstein is great in its way, but I find it just too overbearing now, almost bludgeoning in the 1st and 3rd movements especially. It can inspire devotion, but if you love the piece you need to hear one of the latest issues mentioned above, which also benefit greatly from hi-res sound in their 24-bit download guise. They're both very transparent, natural and spacious, allowing that essential Nielsonian naturlaut, lightness & danceability to dwell alongside all the power and energy.
I've always had a problem with Blomstedt's SFSO readings. Earlier this year I lived for a few weeks with the DRSO set, on the Japanese EMI Forte edition (no obvious evidence of remastering, but great sound anyway...).
Every time I compared the Espansiva I had a strong preference for the DRSO one - more spacious and atmospheric, greater warmth and affection in performance and sound (very obvious at the start of the slow movement). But still with stunning brilliance and power in the brassy climaxes! More open and fulfilling than in San Francisco. This was true of almost the whole set, but especially of 1-3 and 6. The SFSO readings always sound a bit too sleek and clinical, albeit the orchestra is more disciplined in 4 and 5, their best efforts.
So much to say so little time..., but I do think recordings like Bernstein and SFSO/Blomstedt have become wrongly sacrosanct, probably because of earlier appraisal when the music was less familiar, and competition so thin... (Most of the Gramophone reviews of the SFSO pre-dated the remastered DRSO cycle, the late 1990s EMI Forte).
(Good discussion of the 3rd here by Andrew Mellor - http://www.gramophone.co.uk/blog/the...nnial-symphony) (but pre-Oramo or Gilbert!)
And here's Dan Morgan (mahlerei) on Oramo...
http://www.musicweb-international.co...13_BIS2048.htm
Gilbert is ok if Uninvolving. My prefered High Res is Dausgaard's on Blu Ray, but you do make the Oramo enticing.
After listening to the Bernstein today I find that I enjoy his 5th more than his 3rd, but I wouldn't want to be without it.
Comment
-
-
I believe that the Tuxen and Frandsen versions are still available, the latter being one of my favourites as it was the first version that I heard on an old Philips 10" LP, but now very well transferred to CD. On the other hand, the Tuxen is the most convincing version that I have heard, although the new Oramo comes close.
Comment
-
Comment