Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben
View Post
While the Met and Royal Opera relays certainly mean that radio audiences get to hear standard repertory with starry voices, which is important as you suggest, there are equally important questions raised by the strategy. First, subsidising American broadcasts does not meet BBC's brief to foster operatic performance in the UK. Relays from Welsh National Opera, Scottish National Opera, Opera North and ENO are very rare indeed - productions which British taxpayers who fund them deserve to hear.
Second, without going too far off topic (and welcoming makropulos's hopeful plea for Record Review to do a "top 15" devoted to opera!) I can only repeat that Met broadcasts do not compensate for the almost total lack of in-house studio or live-concert opera during the rest of the year. We need only compare the present desert with the superlative record of Radio 3 in funding and presenting rarer operatic repertoire on a very regular basis, during the 1960s to 2000s, to feel that opera is being short-changed by an increasingly populist (anti-"elitist") corporation. This short-changing was apparent even in yesterday's selection. One out of 15? This hardly reflects the seminal importance of opera to Western music, very little of which - even orchestral and chamber patterns - can be properly appreciated without taking operatic history into account.
Audience size is not important, compared to the need for public service - which means, promoting opera positively and widely, without snobbery or defensiveness.
Comment